Newton says it's neutral. That made me wonder... if the protocol doesn't write the rules then maybe the real power belongs to whoever writes the policies.?? @newton_xyz#Newt $NEWT
I thought Newton was adding a security layer. Then I realized it might be redefining what permissionless means. Protection is valuable. But where does protection quietly become permission? @newton_xyz#Newt ethereum:0xd0ec028a3d21533fdd200838f39c85b03679285d
Most trading bots are a huge security risk because they run off chain... Newtons Keystore rollup fixes this by keeping your private keys safe and using smart contracts to validate trades. $NEWT is used for gas to update these permissions. #Newt@newton_xyz
Whats cool abt #Newt is their keystore rollup setup. Instead of just trusting a bot with funds you set strict math boundaries on what it can touch so it protects your wallet. For the tokenomics $NEWT is used for gas to update permissions. @newton_xyz
$NEWT is building a decentralized layer for safe on-chain automation. You can create AI agents that handle trading, portfolio rebalancing and more, but everything stays verifiable with TEE and zero-knowledge proofs. No need to share private keys. @newton_xyz#Newt
Everyone says crypto needs better UX.
But most projects still expect users to understand:
chains, gas, bridges, wallets, approvals.
@GeniusTerminal is interesting because it treats all of that as backend infrastructure.
If users still notice the blockchain, the UX probably failed
Crypto is obsessed with chain abstraction. @GeniusTerminal is pushing aggressive idea: Users shouldnβt even know what chain theyβre on.
No gas management.
No bridges.
No switching.
Just execution.
Interesting part is the invisible infrastructure making that experience possible.