@imnayemhasan For oversee editors, i think tasks are not important. Even every thing done with ai and get 1h to edit and share, still using oversee editor for middle bussiness in EU and US make sense.
A human editor buy time for him with cheap price.
A good that no one can sell.
Sequencing footage and turning raw recordings into compelling stories will be among the last things AI masters in video editing.
Understanding context, emotion, timing, and storytelling is still deeply human.
AI is not even close to matching humans in this area.
I put in my 100% for each client, because I'm an indirect partner in their business. If they can grow on social media, I will grow with them, and vice versa.
I think in future oversee editors can compete with ai even for small bussiness, why?
_ I build this with 20$
_ detailer should put 1 hour to learn, edit this, and fix ai mistakes.
Detalier easily can make more money and clients in 1 hour instead of puting time on editing.
Everyone says plumbers will resist AI. But like shovel sellers during the Gold Rush, editors working with plumbers could benefit from AI.
Plumbers won’t have the time or interest to deal with computers, while editors serving them can take advantage of the opportunity.
I think AI can't handle this kind of editing. It would just save a little time for people who use Meta glasses or record POV videos, especially when there’s a lot of footage. They’ll still need an editor.