You promote a non-custodial future where users have control over their digital identity and assets.
But many legitimate users are currently locked out of their own accounts because the platform now rejects existing Gmail addresses containing a "+".
If users don't have reliable access to their own accounts, can we truly say they are in control? Please prioritize resolving this issue and restoring confidence in the community.
To the Meta Earth team,
@_MetaEarth_@MetaEarthDevs
The recent login restrictions have affected thousands of genuine users who have always supported and contributed to the ecosystem. Many community members are now unable to access their existing accounts without clear explanations or timely resolutions.
Security is important, but it should not come at the cost of locking out legitimate users. We respectfully urge the team to address this issue with urgency, provide transparent updates, and ensure affected users regain access to their accounts as soon as possible.
A strong community is built on trust, communication, and fairness. We hope Meta Earth will prioritize resolving this issue and restoring users' confidence.
The ME Pass team has treated us unfairly
I staked 100 MEC coins but I was logged out because I was using a Gmail account with a + extension Now they are saying I don’t have the right to withdraw my funds Please help me seek my rights
@_MetaEarth_@cryptorover@BitcoinMagazine
Hello
@_MetaEarth_@MetaEarthDevs
I would like you to review your decision about the existing account with + sign.
The decision you take earlier has affected many genuine users.
Please review your decision about this issue.
Help with Retweet $0 🥹
Thank you as you do❤️
「ME 730」: Real Impact I’ve started earning daily unconditional basic Income and helping more people do the same. Create your impact with us and win up to $20,000 in rewards! Join here:... Read more:
https://t.co/4NCIHS7P4u
I’m delighted to have received a crowd of our dedicated supporters in Kano today, who turned out in numbers for a solidarity walk to my residence.
I sincerely thank them for this wonderful show of support and urge them to put this impressive turnout to good use by registering to vote in the upcoming elections. - RMK
1. In 2003, Buhari secured 1.6 million votes in Kano, while Kwankwaso, as governor, failed to deliver the state to Obasanjo and the PDP.
2. In 2007, Buhari received 1 million votes in Kano, and again, Kwankwaso could not deliver the state for Yar'Adua and the PDP.
3. By 2011, Buhari garnered 1.6 million votes in Kano despite the fact that the incumbent governor, Shekarau, was also on the ballot. Even then, Kwankwaso, as the PDP’s gubernatorial candidate, could not deliver Kano to Goodluck Jonathan. In fact, Kwankwaso had to seek support from Buhari's base to reclaim the governorship against Shekarau’s anointed candidate, Salihu Sagir Takai.
4. In 2019, Buhari obtained 1.4 million votes in Kano. Kwankwaso failed to deliver the state for Atiku and the PDP, losing all three senatorial seats to the APC and failing to win a single House of Representatives seat.
5. In 2023, running as a presidential candidate himself, Kwankwaso received 997,279 votes in Kano, failing to reach even the 1 million mark for his own bid.
6. Despite this, Kwankwaso claimed on national television that he delivered 1.9 million votes to Buhari in 2015. Instead of acknowledging Buhari’s personal popularity, he ignored the fact that he used Buhari’s momentum to win his second gubernatorial term in 2011 and his Senate seat in 2015.
7.History shows that Kwankwaso has never successfully delivered Kano to a presidential candidate. Now, Peter Obi is set to experience the same disappointment that Atiku, Obasanjo, Yar'Adua, and Goodluck Jonathan faced by relying on Kwankwaso to deliver Kano.
— AbdulAziz Na'ibi Abubakar
A quick one
-Kwankwaso built 2 universities and 26 colleges in Kano with free tuition fee for Kano indigene.
-Atiku built private university for rich people in Adamawa (6 million per session).
Who’s the true son of the north ?