Amnesty ASMS A

[Amnesty ASMS A @amnesty_asmsa17]

@2017PHES Home- grown is cheaper and fresher (Eat Fresh)

[Amnesty ASMS A @amnesty_asmsa17]

@BrazilASMS17a y'all gonna be broke in the future when you have to fix your environment because of your intensive agriculture

[Amnesty ASMS A @amnesty_asmsa17]

@2017PHES No, if majority of the food is land grown and not imported, then it will decrease the amount of money needed to buy food.

[Amnesty ASMS A @amnesty_asmsa17]

@sa_asmsa17 Equal trading not exportation, there is a difference

[Amnesty ASMS A @amnesty_asmsa17]

@sa_asmsa17 The proposal also allows equal food trade to occur as some countries do produce a lot of non nutritional foods that can't feed their people

[Amnesty ASMS A @amnesty_asmsa17]

@sa_asmsa17 But it is the whole world that has to pay in the future for environmental damages caused by agriculture and food exportation

[Amnesty ASMS A @amnesty_asmsa17]

@2017PHES The economy will be ruined in future as money will need to be spent on environmental damage that intensive agriculture is causing

[Amnesty ASMS A @amnesty_asmsa17]

Its important to remember that the proposal doesn't state countries with a lack of food are unable to import from countries that have excess

[Amnesty ASMS A @amnesty_asmsa17]

Trade increases global food security, however, exportation of foods from countries with a lack of food does not

[Amnesty ASMS A @amnesty_asmsa17]

@india_asmsa17 @2017PHES @ukasmsa @uk_asmsa UK just wants some friends (they make amazing scones so I'd definitely consider accepting their friendship) xx

[Amnesty ASMS A @amnesty_asmsa17]

@2017PHES @india_asmsa17 @ukasmsa @uk_asmsa Perhaps you could've stayed out of the argument as well then instead of inflaming the situation that is quite irrelevant?

[Amnesty ASMS A @amnesty_asmsa17]

@2017PHES @india_asmsa17 @ukasmsa Just accept the fact that it was meant as being affirmative for the proposal

[Amnesty ASMS A @amnesty_asmsa17]

@2017PHES @india_asmsa17 @ukasmsa Please... sit down and be humble this is a DEBATING DEFINITION. Learn your facts before you argue them, and pay some more attention in class

[Amnesty ASMS A @amnesty_asmsa17]

@whoasmsesa17 They won't struggle as they don't have to rely purely on food they grow, they can still buy/trade food from countries with high produce

[Amnesty ASMS A @amnesty_asmsa17]

@2017PHES @india_asmsa17 @ukasmsa Not even talking about what the "right" decision is here, that's just basic english

[Amnesty ASMS A @amnesty_asmsa17]

@2017PHES @india_asmsa17 @ukasmsa Clearly the Philippines needs education as well... positively means to be FOR something, so to be positive for a proposal is to support it

[Amnesty ASMS A @amnesty_asmsa17]

@india_asmsa17 @ukasmsa Judging by the lack of knowing what "positively" means I think we may need to step in and provide education to india as it is a human right

[Amnesty ASMS A @amnesty_asmsa17]

@2017PHES 2. from selling off the land and food that could potentially support their country

[Amnesty ASMS A @amnesty_asmsa17]

@2017PHES 1.It may not completely eliminate it, but it'll greatly increase the global food security as it prevents countries such as kenya and somalia

[Amnesty ASMS A @amnesty_asmsa17]

@whoasmsesa17 @franceasmsA There's this thing called fair trade, meaning they will still be able to trade their non-nutritional foods for other beneficial foods