Adrienne Monke

[Adrienne Monke @AMonke47]

@Bitcoinprof0637 BTC

[Adrienne Monke @AMonke47]

@Bitcoinprof0637 BTC

[Adrienne Monke @AMonke47]

@verasitytech
@rjmark_verasity

[Marcel ₿ @nite_crypto]

How is it possible that you stole money from investors in one of the best communities in the crypto industry, and then simply launched a new project without comment and now you pretended nothing happened? Team $vra, what a shitty moral compass you have??? I feel sad, truly sad.

[Adrienne Monke @AMonke47]

What are longterm $VRA holders to think?
Will they ever see the value of their original investment?
Holders have been destroyed and likely forgotten

@verasitytech
@rjmark_verasity

[donlow @lv26067]

@verasitytech Value should belong to longterm holders from everywhere holding $VRA anywhere

[Adrienne Monke @AMonke47]

Similar experience

$VRA

[HashTheoryBro 🧠🪙 @HashTheoryBro]

I lost $14,000 in VRA.

That’s real. That’s not a flex.
That’s pain.

I battled for this project.
I challenged anyone who spoke negatively about it.
I defended it publicly, relentlessly because I believed.

And to everyone I challenged, argued with, or dismissed
I’m sorry.

Not because I was malicious���
but because I was convinced.

This is absolutely horrible.
There’s no way to dress that up.

But hear this clearly

Loss like this doesn’t destroy a real community
it binds it in ways profit never could.

Anyone can cheer in green.
Anyone can post rockets when it’s easy.
But what we’ve been through together will connect us stronger than you could ever imagine.

You will never see a community as strong as this again.
Ever.

Because communities like this are forged in adversity, not hype.

I’m still here.
I’m not running.
And neither are the ones who truly mattered.

This isn’t the end.
It’s the chapter that exposes truth and reveals character.

🤝🔥

@verasitytech @rjmark_verasity $VRA #VRA #CryptoScam #AI #Crypto

[Adrienne Monke @AMonke47]

@verasitytech @rjmark_verasity @ceoverasity

[Sammy B💎Y @SammyB27065695]

Insane to think that my $VRA bags were once sat at $63k and now they're down to $1.2k. The team have truly been awful to their community, changing whitepapers, minting tokens, not communicating, moving goal posts, amongst many other things. I feel sorry for everyone invested tbh.

[Adrienne Monke @AMonke47]

@verasitytech @rjmark_verasity @ceoverasity

[Aries @AriesCrypto99]

@CryptoAndyUK Think that's a poor excuse for $Vra surely minimal updates are required.

Not absolute complete radio silence.

Clutching at straws comes to mind.

[Adrienne Monke @AMonke47]

@verasitytech @rjmark_verasity @ceoverasity

[Preston ⛨ @massriot8]

$VRA team needs to do whatever it's going to do as soon as possible. People can't wait forever.
Everyone has a limit to their patience.��
@verasitytech

[Adrienne Monke @AMonke47]

@verasitytech @rjmark_verasity @ceoverasity

[Crypto UK 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @theendgame666]

⚠️ THREAD -The VRA Situation Is Starting To Look Suspicious

1/
I’ll say it straight: the recent behaviour from VRA doesn’t look like “normal updates” or “delays”.
It looks like a team trying to tidy up loose ends before saying something the community won’t like.

2/
First the token supply magically shows 200B on CMC.
No announcement.
No breakdown.
Just “refer to CMC” as if that explains anything.
That alone was wild.

3/
Then VRA says a “general response” is being prepared… and disappears.
If a project knows exactly what happened, they don’t take weeks to write a vague statement.

4/
Next thing you know, old social media accounts quietly vanish.
Old posts get cleaned up.
And the PoV wording suddenly changes.
Why change it now, right after a supply controversy?

5/
Projects don’t delete history unless the history contradicts what’s coming next.
This is classic PR damage control, not “routine social media housekeeping”.

6/
And instead of addressing the supply mess, they drop a post telling people not to pressure team members because they “have no authority”.
How is that reassuring to anyone?

7/
If everything was fine, they’d just explain it:
– Was the supply always 200B?
– Why did CMC change it?
– Why were older docs different?
– Why modify PoV wording now?

8/
Holders aren’t being negative.
They’re asking basic questions any legit project should answer instantly.

9/
The silence is doing more damage than the actual issue.
People lose trust when a project hides old posts, edits definitions, and delays explanations.

10/
If VRA wants confidence back, it’s simple:
Be transparent.
Show the receipts.
Stop dodging.

Until then, people are right to question it.

#VRA #Verasity #CryptoScam

[Adrienne Monke @AMonke47]

@verasitytech
Communicate with the community
Meaningful plans and explanations
No more “GM”

[Erwin @CryptoErwinNL]

No, I'm not wondering about this.

My hard-earned money, which I invested in $VRA, doesn't bother me.

OF COURSE, I've wondered about this, and I see what's happening on-chain and all the billions of mints.

In principle, it should be the escrow pool you're seeing.

But there are more things going on right now, and I'm not ruling anything out.

Again, only the team knows what's really going on.

To reassure everyone, I think the team should clarify this as soon as possible.

[Adrienne Monke @AMonke47]

@verasitytech
The silence hurts your brand
Communication needs to improve

“GM” check-in is blind to community concern.

[Raiden @ibos]

10 days later ... still no answers, no update, no article, nothing $VRA I told you :) Clown team !

@verasitytech @ceoverasity

[Adrienne Monke @AMonke47]

@verasitytech

Silent for too long

[az.16 @az_16_vra]

May I announce it already ?
@verasitytech

Nah just kidding .

[Adrienne Monke @AMonke47]

@verasitytech time for action
Respond to the community

[Crypto Sheriff @Eddie202021]

My only problem with $Vra isn't even the tokenomics. It's the lack of communication from the team. In days like this you gotta show up regardless the market condition.
If you give weekly updates like you used to in the past, its a different story. You brought up this chaos!

[Adrienne Monke @AMonke47]

@verasitytech

[DirkDonders @DirkDonders15]

For years, this community has shown a level of loyalty most projects could only dream of.

We’ve reached a point where transparency is absolutely essential.

Talk to us.
Respect us.
Keep us close.

We want to move forward WITH you, not behind you.

We are not your enemy.

$VRA

[Adrienne Monke @AMonke47]

Wen is update? @verasitytech

[PLRL by Verasity @verasitytech]

A general update is being prepared by Verasity’s senior team. Marketing, social media contributors, and community moderators cannot issue updates without accurate information and explicit authorisation from Verasity.

While community frustration is recognised, threats, accusations, and slander are unacceptable and place unnecessary pressure on team members who manage official channels but have no decision-making authority over company operations.

Verasity is also escalating serious cases by reporting accounts and defamatory accusations against team members to local law enforcement and legal authorities.

[PLRL by Verasity @verasitytech]

A general update is being prepared by Verasity’s senior team. Marketing, social media contributors, and community moderators cannot issue updates without accurate information and explicit authorisation from Verasity.

While community frustration is recognised, threats, accusations, and slander are unacceptable and place unnecessary pressure on team members who manage official channels but have no decision-making authority over company operations.

Verasity is also escalating serious cases by reporting accounts and defamatory accusations against team members to local law enforcement and legal authorities.

[Adrienne Monke @AMonke47]

@verasitytech

[Adrienne Monke @AMonke47]

@verasitytech @shape Out of touch. Read the room. These posts do more harm. All people want is a relevant update. Prove you’re not a scam. Stop with the “GM”

[Adrienne Monke @AMonke47]

@rjmark_verasity @verasitytech

[Crypto UK 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @theendgame666]

🔥 THREAD: The Verasity (VRA) Problem Nobody Wants To Talk About 🔥

For everyone wondering what’s really going on with $VRA, PoV, supply, and the constant moving of goalposts here’s the full breakdown with facts, not feelings.

If this doesn’t open a few eyes, nothing will.

👇🧵

1️⃣ PoV Was Originally Sold as “Non-Tradable”

For YEARS, the messaging was crystal clear:
•PoV tokens were marker tokens
•Used internally for ad-fraud verification
•Not part of circulating supply
•Would never be traded, sold, or put on exchanges
•And wouldn’t dilute VRA holders

This wasn’t one comment it was a repeated narrative across FAQs, documents, AMAs, and community responses.

Investors bought VRA on that understanding.

2️⃣ Fast forward and suddenly PoV can be sold

Without fanfare
Without a major announcement
And without acknowledging the contradiction

The language was slowly changed.

Now the official wording says:
•PoV may be traded at discretion
•PoV may enter circulating supply
•PoV may be inflationary
•And PoV may impact VRA price

That’s a complete 180° from the original pitch.

And the new disclaimers basically say:
“Nothing we said before was binding anyway.”

3️⃣ And the supply? Yeah that changed too.

Originally:
•Max supply: 10B
•Circulating: 10B-ish

Then PoV gets introduced
Then “dual token system”
Then “ecosystem separation”
And now the numbers thrown around are:
•93B+
•100B+
•200B max ecosystem supply

Depending on which doc, AMA, or chart you read.

So much for a “fixed” supply.

4️⃣ The community didn’t imagine this the docs WERE changed.

People have screenshots, archives, and saved PDFs.
Old wording vs new wording is right there in black and white.

This is not “FUD.”

It’s literally documented history.

5️⃣ Is this illegal? That’s the debate.

Legally?
Crypto projects bury themselves in disclaimers from day one:
•“Forward looking statements.”
•“Not financial advice.”
•“Not legally binding.”
•“May change at any time.”

So trying to sue them is like trying to fight smoke.

But ethically?

🔴 Changing token promises
🔴 Changing supply
🔴 Changing PoV rules
🔴 Deleting old Medium posts
🔴 Not communicating clearly
🔴 And letting holders eat the cost

…is absolutely horrible investor treatment.

Whether regulators care is another story.

6️⃣ The real issue isn’t legal. It’s trust.

Crypto projects rise and fall on credibility.

And VRA has:
•Moved goalposts
•Rewritten tokenomics mid-game
•Shifted PoV rules
•Updated disclaimers to cover themselves
•Gone mostly silent publicly
•And left holders confused, frustrated, and diluted

If you were building a case study on how to destroy community trust, this would be it.

7️⃣ Holders deserve real answers.

Not silence.
Not vague tweets.
Not ecosystem expansion jargon.
Not last-minute edits to whitepapers.

Just straight:
•What is PoV (VRA) now?
•Will PoV be sold?
•What supply is real?
•What dilution is possible?
•Why were original promises changed?
•And what EXACTLY should investors expect?

Until those questions are answered clearly, the uncertainty will remain and so will the pressure on the token.

8️⃣ Final thought

You can love a project and still call out inconsistencies.

You can hold a bag and still demand transparency.

VRA doesn’t need hype.
VRA doesn’t need moonboys.

It needs clarity, consistency, and honesty about tokenomics and PoV.

The community isn’t asking for miracles just the truth.

🧵 END

If you found this useful, RT the first post.
The more eyes on this, the faster the answers come.
#Verasity #Veraviews @ceoverasity @rjmark_verasity
@TheFCA

[Adrienne Monke @AMonke47]

@verasitytech

Team? Leadership? Transparency? COMMUNICATION?

Where are you?!???

[G17 @xG17xBx]

$VRA The price is reflected in how the team communicates with the community which is the most important thing in crypto. The community and hype don't come for nothing. The truth is that the team effectively made fun of us with the 90B coin injection.