@_MAEXimum_@elliotttender you could literally say the same thing for all opinions that somebody once shared in order for them to spread. Something is broken if you are scared of valid arguments.
@SallyStrange 1. if you start using the term bigot to avoid debates, I see a problem.
2. if the intent of a person is obviously threatening the life of people without intending to save others, it is going too far. But thats just a loose rule,there might be instances where I judge differently.
@SallyStrange 1. If you go too far, you start looking for something bigoted if you are confronted with different opinions.
2. I‘m not sure if I completely understand the question, but if you mean „how different should an opinion be to be acceptable“, I would say as much as possible.
@OrionKidder @SecretGamerGrrl If someone can‘t handle criticism properly, the internet might not be the best place to share your opinions. But I‘m sorry if anyone was feeling personally attacked by my tweets, was not my intention.
@SallyStrange on the feminist movement for example. I still support the core values, however I don‘t thing being critical of feminism means being a sexist anymore.
@SallyStrange one example would be thunderf00t.I don‘t agree with the guy on many topics, however I still listen to the things he says, and the arguments are reasonable.I’m consuming a lot of media I don‘t agree on, because the Internet makes it too easy to ignore opinions other than your own.
@OrionKidder @SecretGamerGrrl it‘s not that easy.There are choices which MIGHT cause humanitarian issues,but the counter-choices might as well. Take abortion or guns for example.Should we impose sanctions or make deals with coutries that ignore human rights?Assuming bad faith on the other side poisons debates