Every person should be able to take pride in their work, their effort and the end result. Including journalists.
Taking pride in a "job well done" does not mean the job wasn't done appropriately.
I salute Christina for her work in the 1990s. The distance of time between then and now makes it appropriate to reflect and judge whether that was "a job well done".
Thank you, Ms Amanpour, for providing the viewers with invaluable inside into the insanity of war.
@amanpour western double standards. Mladic was convicted. Netanyahu faces an active ICC arrest warrant. the US hunted Mladic for his crimes. now, the US shielding and protecting Netanyahu from arrest including impose sanctions on ICC. Global justice vs US imposed justice.
One of the world's most brutal murderers is finally dead.
At 84 years old the former Bosnian Serb general, Ratko Mladić lived way longer than he allowed his tens of thousands of victims.
The more than 7000 Muslim men and boys he had slaughtered in Srebrenica will be his enduring shame.
At least he was tried by an International Criminal Tribunal and found guilty of his enormous crimes of genocide.
I am proud of the work we journalists did in the 90s to document his crimes against humanity, to finally hold him accountable.
Ratko Mladić je mrtav i tu nema mnogo šta da se kaže. Niti ta činjenica mijenja mnogo. Ne vraća mrtve. Ne briše masovne grobnice. Ne mijenja presude. Ne pretvara zločinca u historijsku ličnost.
Gledao sam ga u oči u julu 1995. godine, u Potočarima. Gledao sam čovjeka koji je već odlučio šta će se dogoditi ljudima oko mene, uključujući i dominantnu većinu ljudi koje sam poznavao. Kako god, on je umro u zatvoru, osuđen za genocid i druge najteže zločine. Ljudi koje je poslao u smrt nisu dobili priliku da ostare. To je jedina činjenica o njegovoj smrti koja mi je važna.
Sada preostaje teži dio posla: da ne dozvolimo da zajedno s njim umru istina, odgovornost i sjećanje. Mladićeva smrt je još jedan trenutak u kojem moramo odlučiti šta ćemo pamtiti i još važnije, šta nećemo dozvoliti da bude izbrisano.
Imao sam 16 godina kada je naredbom Ratka Mladića uništen čitav jedan svijet – i dok je on, zajedno sa svojim krvoločnim kerovima obučenim u vojne uniforme zauzimao Srebrenicu i pred kamerama najavljivao osvetu „turskim dahijama“, ja sam sa hiljadama svojih nenaoružanih i preplašenih komšija krenuo stazom smrti. Dok je Ratko Mladić pred kamerama uvjeravao naše majke, sestre, rodice i komšinice koje su spas tražile u bazi Holandskog bataljona da im se ništa loše neće dogoditi, ja sam sa hiljadama svojih komšija krenuo putem kojim nikada nisam išao, putem kojim nijedno živo biće nikada nije trabalo hoditi. Dok je Ratko Mladić, znajući šta je spremio i naredio, dijelio bombone nevinoj dječici u bazi Holandskog bataljona, nas su njegovi krvoločni kerovi lovili po šumama kao preplašenu nejač.
Imao sam 16 godina kada sam na jednoj livadi u Đugumu, zbog naredbe Ratka Mladića, ugledao tijelo momka bez donje vilice i šake. Mladićevi kerovi, oni koje danas nazivamo vojnicima, su ga mučili, sjekli i iživaljavali se na njemu – ostavili su ga, kao poruku nama, koji još nismo pali u njihove ruke, šta nas čeka. Molio je da ga ubijemo.
Imao sam 16 godina kada sam se, zajedno sa hiljadama svojih komšija, borio, bez oružja, bez ikakvog znanja, bez hrane i vode za vlastiti život. Danima sam se, kao šesnaestogodišnji dječak borio da preživim iako sam već prvi dan, znao da će to biti gotovo pa nemoguća misija. Na svakom koraku tog puta nailazili smo na mrtve ljude. Na očeve, braću, rođake i komšije. Nailazili smo na svoj narod koji je Ratko Mladić odlučio da istrijebi. Da uništi. Imao sam 16 godina kada je Ratko Mladić uništio čitav jedan svijet.
Ovog puta, koji hiljade mojih rođaka i komšija nije preživjelo – čija tijela su naredbom Ratka Mladića komadana pa bagerima zakopavana po čitavom Podrinju da se istina nikada ne bi saznala, se nikada u cjelosti nisam prisjetio. Ne zato što neću, nego zato što ne mogu. Imao sam 16 godina kada sam, zajedno sa hiljadama svojih rođaka i komšija, izgubio grad, kuću, dom, školu, učitelje, nastavnike, prijatelje, rođake, članove porodice. Imao sam 16 godina kada sam zajedno sa svojim narodom ostao bez svega. Imao sam 16 godina kada nam je Ratko Mladić sve oduzeo.
I umro je. Umro je najgori zločinac ovog vremena. Umro je u zatvorskoj jedinici gdje mu je i bilo mjesto. Umro je i nikada neće biti „general“ kakvim ga danas, oni koji negiraju moju i patnju moga naroda, predstavljaju. Umro je a ja mu nikada neću halaliti. Umro je a moj narod još uvijek traži posmrtne ostatke svojih najmilijih. Umro je a majke još uvijek kopaju šaćicu kostiju svojih sinova povađenih iz različitih masovnih grobnica. Umro je kao kukavica, tražeći da mu se omogući, iz humanitarnih razloga, prijevremeno puštanje na slobodu.
Umro je krvnik moga naroda, Ratko Mladić.
🚨🌍✈️ “Explain this to me like I’m 5 Years Old?”
2 Years ago now US Health Director @RobertKennedyJc gave the World hope by responding to me on one of these posts - saying “We will stop this crime”
Unfortunately the Crime continues. Anyone who says this has always happened is ignorant, dumb, naive or lying.
@RobertKennedyJc follows this account so hopefully maybe able to update us all on whether the Trump Admin is any closer to stopping, or explain explaining, one of the greatest crimes against human.
Spraying the sky with chemicals and blocking out the Sun.
| IG: davenelsonfit |
🚨 DR. WILLIAM MAKIS SAYS THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT IVERMECTIN DOSING GRAPH HE'S CREATED.
Not a new chemotherapy drug.
Not a breakthrough immunotherapy.
Not a billion-dollar cancer treatment.
Just one simple dosing strategy.
According to Dr. William Makis, this is the dosing framework he believes everyone researching repurposed medicines for cancer should understand first.
And it all starts with one number.
📌 1 mg/kg/day.
Before explaining why, here's the dosing framework Dr. Makis discusses.
📊 The Four Ivermectin Dosing Ranges
🟢 Low Dose: ≤0.5 mg/kg/day
Used for cancers in remission, strong family history, genetic predisposition, prophylaxis, and lower-dose protocols discussed in published case reports.
🟡 Medium Dose: 1.0 mg/kg/day
Dr. Makis' recommended starting dose for most cancers.
🔵 High Dose: 2.0 mg/kg/day
Discussed for very aggressive cancers, including leukaemia, pancreatic cancer, and some brain cancers.
🔴 Very High Dose: ≥2.5 mg/kg/day
Discussed in selected reported cases involving extensive metastatic disease or extremely poor prognosis, where temporary visual side effects have also been reported.
Now here's why Dr. Makis believes 1 mg/kg/day deserves the most attention.
After reviewing laboratory research, published studies, and numerous case reports, he says this is the starting dose he recommends for most cancers.
According to Dr. Makis, research has investigated Ivermectin across a surprisingly wide range of cancers, including:
• Breast cancer
• Colon cancer
• Lung cancer
• Pancreatic cancer
• Kidney (renal cell) cancer
• Gastric cancer
• Leukemia
One exception stood out.
Lymphoma.
Dr. Makis says he has found very little published research involving Ivermectin and lymphoma.
That doesn't mean it doesn't work.
It simply means the evidence is currently limited.
❓What does 1 mg/kg/day actually look like?
For someone weighing 60 kg (132 lbs)...
That's approximately 60 mg of Ivermectin every day.
Equivalent to:
💊 Five 12 mg tablets
OR
💧 About 6 mL of liquid Ivermectin, roughly one teaspoon.
According to Dr. Makis, that's where he recommends starting for many cancers.
Can lower doses still have an effect?
✅ He believes they can.
Dr. Makis discusses a published ovarian cancer case reported by Dr. Tess Lawrie.
The dosing chart lists the patient as receiving 12 mg of Ivermectin per day. During his discussion, Dr. Makis explains that this was approximately 0.2 mg/kg/day, placing it within the chart's Low Dose (≤0.5 mg/kg/day) range.
📉 According to the case report, the patient's CA125 tumor marker reportedly fell from 288 to 22 after two months.
That case is one reason Dr. Makis believes Ivermectin may have anticancer activity even at lower doses.
However...
He also believes the available evidence suggests the effect is dose dependent.
In other words...
Higher doses may produce greater effects, although more clinical research is needed.
What about the most aggressive cancers?
• Pancreatic cancer
• Leukemia
• Brain cancer
For cancers like these, Dr. Makis discusses doses around 2 mg/kg/day in selected situations.
He notes that Ivermectin crosses the blood-brain barrier, although not very efficiently, which is one reason he says higher doses may be considered for some brain cancers.
He also discusses a case reported by Dr. Allan Landrito.
According to Dr. Makis, a physician with terminal gallbladder cancer reportedly took 2 mg/kg/day for 14 months.
He says her cancer eventually disappeared.
She experienced temporary visual side effects that resolved after a few days.
❓How high have reported doses gone?
According to Dr. Makis, he has seen reported doses as high as 2.5 mg/kg/day.
He references patients treated by Dr. Shankara Chetty who reportedly used those doses without long-term side effects, although some experienced temporary visual disturbances that later resolved.
One point Dr. Makis returns to repeatedly...
Long-term use.
He references the Castro study involving children with leukemia who reportedly received Ivermectin for six months without long-term side effects.
He also discusses anecdotal reports of adults taking it daily for more than a year without long-term toxicity.
So why aren't there larger cancer trials?
Dr. Makis believes one of the biggest obstacles is economics.
Because Ivermectin is an off-patent generic medicine, he argues there is little financial incentive to fund large clinical trials.
Whether future research ultimately confirms or challenges these ideas remains to be seen.
But Dr. Makis' message is remarkably simple.
One graph.
One dosing strategy.
One starting point.
📌 1 mg/kg/day.
Because the conversation isn't just about Ivermectin anymore.
It's about whether repurposed drugs deserve the same level of scientific investigation as newer therapies.
🗨️ Do you think inexpensive repurposed medicines like Ivermectin deserve larger, well-designed clinical trials for cancer?
🔖 Save this post so you'll always have Dr. Makis' dosing framework handy, and repost it to help others discover the ongoing research into repurposed medicines.
💊 Looking for pharmaceutical grade Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, or Mebendazole? Choose @joetippens_
Email: [email protected]
Text :+1 (786) 519-4841
WhatsApp: +1 (410) 422-1311
. Trusted by thousands of customers worldwide.
#Ivermectin #CancerResearch #RepurposedDrugs #Oncology #CancerCare #MedicalResearch #PancreaticCancer #MakisMD
They aren’t just “vaccinating” you.
They’re injecting you with DNA that is not yours.
Human cells.
Animal cells.
Chicken egg proteins.
Dr. Bryan Ardis lays it out plainly: When they grow these shots in other living cells, pieces of that foreign DNA and protein end up inside you.
Your immune system wakes up, sees “this isn’t my DNA”…and starts attacking. That’s how you get lifelong autoimmune disease.
Lupus.
RA.
MS.
Hashimoto’s.
The list keeps growing.
They manufacture the majority of these products this way. They just don’t want you connecting the dots. Watch this once. Then watch it again. Your body was never supposed to fight itself.
U Srbiji danas svjedočimo tome da i vlast i kvaziopozicija kleče pred Mladićem... Veliča ta stoka, sitnog zuba, najvećeg ubicu i krvnika novog vremena... Ratnog zločinca osuđenog za genocid. To nije politika. To je kult ubice. Nezgodno mi je zbog časnih ljudi, mojih prijatelja, ali kult ubice uvijek govori više o narodu koji ga slavi nego o samom zločincu
They decide who gets rain, who doesn't. They decide how toxic that rain is. Nobody has a right to experiment on us in this manner. Geoengineering is nothing less than weather warfare, do you object?
You cannot have a legitimate discussion about climate change unless you discuss climate engineering first and foremost. You can't eliminate the biggest part of the puzzle of all. These people have to be held accountable. Raytheon, one of the largest weather modification players, does all the weather modeling for the National Weather Service and NOAA. You have the foxes, quite literally, running the henhouse. Lockheed Martin does all the modeling for the FAA. We have a lot of disaster capitalists on this, as I mentioned, Monsanto. We have weather trading derivatives going on. So while they're trying to hide the full scope of damage with climate engineering, by doing even more damage at the same time from the same programs, they're also running gaming casinos on the stock market for weather trading derivatives. So they decide whose crops fail, whose don't. The media's betrayal is astounding. Are you opposed to that?
Follow for more: @DaneWigington
Keep posting, keep sharing, keep shouting, keep raising awareness, and most importantly, keep the faith, because we must reach critical mass if we stand any chance of putting an end to this madness above our heads .@IonisedSkyWatch@druid10@ElizabethF6116@Gp1ggy1@nogps1
🚨🚨REMINDER‼️
PFIZER was FORCED to publish the adverse effects of its vaccine—they wanted to hide it for 75 years 🤨
🇺🇸 After a U.S. Judge Forced the FDA to DECLASSIFY the PFIZER vaccine data; 9 pages with 1291 ADVERSE EFFECTS were revealed, in Confidential Documents
Share!