This is pretty neat. A project called Colors for Kamala is selling limited edition nail polish sets, with all proceeds going to the Harris-Walz campaign. A great way to support the VP and look good doing it.
Purchase here: https://t.co/XAa9HDiRXM
The venn diagram of men complaining that women won't have sex with them, and men yelling at women to stop being slutty and keep their legs closed, is a perfect circle.
Fittingly, in his leaked draft decision overturning Roe, Justice Alito relies on a 17th century English jurist who had two women executed for witchcraft and said it should be legal for husbands to rape their wives.
I wrote about it for Jez:
https://t.co/vrrgJRpZGJ
Reminder that an entire generation of women was robbed of control over their health and bodies due to misinformation about menopause hormone therapy. Check out this conversation with @DrJenGunter on @GlennonDoyle’s latest podcast episode. https://t.co/DrQa1E8GZp
I have had an abortion. All that matters about it was that it allowed me to be free. It was a condition of my freedom. This is not just about girls’/women’s/ovary-having humans’ freedom to choose, but about our choices to be free. This is about our freedom, and those who hate it.
Y'all. Justice Sotomayor can count votes. She knows where this is headed... either viability is gone or Roe is gone.
Her questions are for the public... to let us know that abortion isn't the end. It's just beginning of the unraveling of these other rights of intimate life.
@MichelleHux After 20+ yrs with a career in UX design, I decided to leave it all behind and go back to school to get my masters in Architecture. I'm 56. For those contemplating if it's too late to do something/anything, the answer is no. It's not.
@herbadmother @designmom@ReproRights
While we’re on the subject of breaking down specious patriarchal framing: Kavanaugh just asserted that the fetus has rights the State must consider. “The State” and our governing bodies have jurisdiction over citizens and inhabitants.
Is it not then yet a(nother patriarchal) syllogistic fallacy to suggest the State or any court has a right to legislate or have jurisdiction over a not-yet-citizen-or-inhabitant and their rights *above* the rights of an existing citizen or inhabitant?
@herbadmother @ReproRights As for visitor, that unborn fetus isn’t IN the United States. The fetus is IN it’s MOTHER (who is born with inalienable sovereignty over her own body whether this country wants to recognize and respect it or not).
@herbadmother @ReproRights You are considered a United States citizen “if you were born anywhere in the United States or its territories.” “BORN“ and “IN” are pivotal words here. That baby fetus is neither citizen nor inhabitant (yet), and may *never* be (that baby could be born *anywhere*).