Picture the worst moment in a cross-chain swap: your asset has left one chain and hasn't arrived on the other.
On a bridge, that gap is where money disappears.
On Pact, that gap doesn't exist. There's no in-between state to get stuck in.
The trade either completes or its not executed.
Most cross-chain DEXs lock collateral relative to general protocol parameters, not to the trade itself.
That mismatch is why over-collateralization happens.
Capital sits idle to cover worst-case scenarios.
On Pact, Coinweb's reactive smart contracts lock the collateral before your trade executes.
No dispute process required.
Most DEXs make you ask permission to earn from the swaps you send them.
Pact skips that. Sign up with one call, set your cut, get paid in USDT automatically once you hit $100. No approval queue, no waiting on a yes.
Your funds never touch Pact's hands either.
Validators don't necessarily make cross-chain swaps safer.
Pact takes a different path
No validator set. No bonded nodes. No secondary consensus layer.
Reactive smart contracts read L1 state directly. Outcomes enforced by code.
Fewer actors = less risk.
.@litecoin has moved value fast and cheap for over a decade.
With Pact, you can swap into native LTC from BTC, ETH, or stables, all cross-chain.
No bridges or wrapping required 😉
If you're managing a multichain treasury, here's the math:
Every cross-chain move on a bridge costs you 1-2% in fees, validator risk, and timing exposure.
Every cross-chain move on Pact averages 0.36% in cost and clears in minutes.
Compounded over a year, that gap is seismic.
LP yield on Pact comes from one place: real swap volume.
No emissions. No token inflation. No farming incentives propping up APR.
If the swaps stop, the yield stops. If the swaps grow, the yield grows.
Honest unit economics for liquidity providers.