@ReillyEagles@THEDavidMarcus@_CCE_@SentiveJ Yeah sure, but that isn't where money is made in design, though. That's always been for freelance/juniors filling monetary holes. Most of the ones on Twitter are Fiverr Russian Photoshop artists, weirdly enough.
@cosmo25x@cyb_rslums@WorkTheSpace Running a powerful image model at home is possible. Running the new models, training them, or matching the quality, speed, multimodal integration, and constant updating of major commercial systems is another matter. That still leans heavily on serious compute and infrastructure.
@dcbruck @yearning_tree @johnsportraits This is a terrible design principle, though. This is what people who have never studied art don't understand. A machine can't tell you what is visually appealing about an image that human eyes have to interpret. It's why Munch's scream is so revered.
@THEDavidMarcus@ReillyEagles@_CCE_@SentiveJ Chum brands will begin to replace low-value art with generative AI. But AI will never come up with novel ideas all on its own. That's not how language learning systems work, especially with art.
@WorkTheSpace@GneGneZ1 Which is true, and why the market will adapt. This sort of design will be exposed. Nobody will pay a graphic designer money for low-value, repeatable work like football graphics. It won't, however, threaten Client-facing creative problem-solving and design systems.