@stevezieskidoo@SteveStuWill that is, if we can imagine everyone matched with their percentile of sex-drive in the opposite sex (top 1% of horny men get top 1% horny women), since the male bell curve is shifted up in total horniness, every man will wind up with a less horny wife.
@stevezieskidoo@SteveStuWill that doesnt follow.
presumably theres some degree of assortative mating, such that horny men get with hornier women (and vice versa). This likely works to the end of most men winding up with less horny partners.
@fasdafopic@aus_pill i mean ur right ppl r dumb, i just dont think anyone in the real world, anyone white, believes in racial superiority to begin with.
which would entail atleast a base level of selective pressure.
but what do i know!!!!
@ztech1979@CognitiveMetric what?
this is expected on any model of intelligence. Geniuses can choose to be coal miners. Retards cant choose to be Rocket Scientists.
This is conceivable with or without any quantification of intelligence.
@Arc549108690741 the literature on german schizophrenia is earnestly interesting thoughbeit, though its broader application outside of extreme societal shocks is unclear.
@_OGarib_@Z1goter "you think history isnt stagnant, due it fluctuating? Well, Water fluctuates but its still considered stagnant, rejecting that is absurd"
id need to actually evidence the claim water can fluctuate while remaining stagnant, for the reductio to work. i cant just assert it.
@_OGarib_@Z1goter yes, your reductio relied on naturalist cosmology.
Otherwise its incoherent.
reductios need either to be entirely internal to the system or to be true.
yours wasnt internal to my system, or true.
you were just saying things.
you dont understand reductio ad absurdums.