Anand Swaminathan

Soccer Fan

[EPL Bible @EPLBible]

Just remember Maguire didn’t receive a card here

Did the rules change? 🤨

[Rabin @city_rabin]

This you , @AdamJoseph?

[ً @ProudieYT]

Enzo going for the ball but not touching it shouldn’t really count as offside when this counted two years ago

[Prathap @shiva_prat99865]

We #anbaanafans Stood with his character beyond a decade of his movies not doing well at boxoffice.
We didn't do anything abusive,character assassination,degrading family like other Fandom started a issue.

@Suriya_offl Enga Annan never encourage that

Dogs 🐕 bark louderrr...

[Anand Swaminathan @anand12100]

@WisemanCap @Muse @WisemanCap What are the main stuff you are using Muse for ?

[PttvOnlinenews @PttvNewsX]

"Tableல இருக்க 3 Filesஐ பாக்குறதுக்கு முன்னாடி ஒரு Sample பாக்கலாமா" - முதல்வர் விஜய்

#CMVijay | #TNAssembly | #DMK | #TVK | #UdhayanidhiStalin

[RamKumarr @ramk8060]

நேத்து வாங்குனாங்க இன்னிக்கு வாங்கல 👏👏

@VigneshTvkCbe ❤️

[Gomathi Sivam @GomatiSivam]

Mad respect to @VigneshTvkCbe 💥💥

As a single man with unshakeable support from @CMOTamilnadu, he strives to reform the whole industry..

#TVKGovt #TASMAC #CMJosephVijay‌

[Union AI @union_ai]

Hear from Ketan Umare @ketanumare , our co-founder and CEO, on how Union works with AWS to solve some of the hardest problems in AI.

#StartupPartnerSummit2026

[CMOTamilNadu @CMOTamilnadu]

போக்குவரத்து அலுவலகத்தின் சேவைகள் குறித்து சட்டமன்றப் பேரவையில் விதி 110-இன் கீழ் மாண்புமிகு தமிழ்நாடு முதலமைச்சர் திரு.ச.ஜோசப் விஜய் அவர்களின் அறிவிப்புகள்

#CMJosephVijay‌

[Logan Kilpatrick @OfficialLoganK]

Introducing Gemini 3.8 Flash, another jump in Gemini's agentic + coding capabilities, and our 3rd updated Flash model in only 6 weeks...

This model has been a ton of fun to work with, excited to see what you all think!

[Lxyv @wholyv]

I love OpenAI so much about this behaviour of theirs.

their service doesn’t work for 1 hour and they send you mails and post a tweet acknowledging.

then we have that orange asshole shaped logo company whose models are down 8 times in 7 days. and then they compensate for it by reducing your limits by 25%

[SureshSamy2.0 @sureshsamyTVK]

Bravo Bravo @VigneshTvkCbe 👏🏼
Beautifully explained the whole scenario what has happened in Tasmac over 20 years, how these corrupt Dravidian politicians controlling the dept for black money.

[Greater Chennai Corporation @chennaicorp]

வடகிழக்குப் பருவமழை முன்னெச்சரிக்கை நடவடிக்கையாக, தண்டையார்பேட்டை மண்டலம் 38 ஆவது வார்டு எண்ணூர் சாலையில் உள்ள கால்வாயில் மிதவை இயந்திரம் மூலம் ஆகாயத்தாமரை செடிகள் அகற்றும் பணி மேற்கொள்ளப்பட்டு வருகிறது.

#ChennaiCorporation | #NammaChennai #MonsoonPreparedness | #ChennaiRains

@TNDIPRNEWS @MawsTamilNadu

[Anand Swaminathan @anand12100]

@georgeviews @prawin_ceg

[George @georgeviews]

Big Expose by Parandur Farmers 😲

"Around 5 years ago, expecting the airport project, a "mafia gang" and real estate investors linked to the previous ruling party DMK invested hundreds of crores to acquire land in the area. They expected to make 3x to 4x massive profits from land."

[Polimer News @polimernews]

"இன்னைக்கு மாலையே வெளியிடுறேன் பாருங்க.." சட்டப்பேரவையில் காலையில் சொன்னது போல் மாலையில் மூடப்பட்ட மதுக்கடைகளின் முழு விவரங்களை முகவரியுடன் வெளியிட்ட அமைச்சர் விக்னேஷ்..!

#TNAssembly | #TVK | #Vignesh | #TASMAC | #PolimerNews

[David Sacks @DavidSacks]

Some thoughts on Dario’s post:

1. Dario does not actually address Gavin Baker’s account of what he said – something he could easily deny if it were inaccurate.

2. Dario claims his critics live in a “bubble” where all regulation equals regulatory capture. He calls this an overly simplified view and notes that “Many people outside this bubble think of regulation as something that constrains corporate power and benefits ordinary people.” This argument is a straw man. Of course treating all regulation as capture would be overly simplified – but almost no one holds that view. I have repeatedly argued for strong antitrust enforcement to keep industries competitive, especially Big Tech. If Anthropic continues toward monopoly or duopoly status, I would be among the first to demand those rules apply.

3. Regulatory capture is not vague or in the eye of the beholder. Nobel laureate George Stigler defined it as regulation acquired by an industry and designed and operated primarily for its benefit. Stigler challenged the traditional view that government regulation arises from a benevolent state protecting the public from market failures. Rather, industry groups have concentrated stakes and pour resources into influencing regulators, whereas the public’s stake is diffuse and unorganized. The revolving door between companies and the agencies that regulate them compounds the problem. Anthropic understands these dynamics: it has hired multiple senior Biden AI-policy officials and built a substantial government-affairs operation plus a network of aligned organizations to push its preferred frameworks at state and federal levels.

4. Dario has consistently pushed for a new federal agency to review and approve frontier models prior to release – a proposal framed variously as an “FDA for AI,” an “FAA for AI,” and most recently a “FINRA for AI.” I call it a “DMV for AI” because a review process modeled on the FAA or FDA (which takes years) or FINRA (which issues rules for a staid industry widely seen as protecting incumbents) will create long queues as AI models wait for testing and approval. This process will only become more labyrinthine as rules accumulate to prevent theoretical harms. This would handicap the U.S. relative to China, which will not adopt the same constraints. It would also undermine Anthropic’s own business model, whose pricing power depends on remaining ahead of open models. Whatever Dario states today, it is difficult to believe the company would simply accept outcomes that erase that advantage.

5. Anthropic is on track to become one of the most valuable companies in history, with the resources to navigate any approval process and shape the rules while competitors wait. Dario wants open models under heavier scrutiny – he has called them dangerous in Senate testimony, criticized them for not being centrally monitored or withdrawn, and linked them to IP theft. He says he has never sought a ban, but he could achieve a similar result by insisting that identical rules apply to both open and closed models. The U.S. risks becoming an island of costly closed models while the rest of the world races ahead with broader choice.

6. Dario acknowledges that AI is structurally centralizing but attributes this mainly to chips and scaling laws. Access to compute matters, but the deeper risk is who decides which capabilities are available to whom. His preferred pre-deployment testing and FAA/FINRA-style oversight would place that gatekeeping power in a federal bureaucracy working hand-in-glove with a small number of frontier labs – reinforcing centralization rather than countering it.

7. The second part of Dario’s post assumes we have amnesia about Anthropic’s well-orchestrated campaigns hyping AI fears. His May 2025 claim that AI would wipe out 50 percent of entry-level knowledge jobs within five years still lacks supporting evidence fifteen months later. Similarly Anthropic breathlessly promoted its heavily contrived “blackmail” study on 60 Minutes. Yet Dario blames public negativity on a long-standing loss of trust in institutions rather than his own messaging.

8. These narratives have done more than anything to shape public fear. People are left asking the same question Mark Zuckerberg posed: why race to build a future you describe in such negative terms? Thomas Sowell’s "The Vision of the Anointed" captures the mindset – elite intellectuals convinced that only they are enlightened enough to control the outcome. As Zuckerberg notes, concentrating power in the hands of an enlightened few has rarely produced the promised results; the practitioners turn out to be less enlightened in practice than in self-conception.

9. Gavin Baker summarized the disagreement cleanly on our pod: Dario believes frontier AI is too powerful to distribute; we believe it is too powerful to centralize. Dario appears to believe, sincerely, that safety and progress are best served by centralizing authority in a marriage of corporate and state power. The weight of human history gives us reason to fear that outcome.

[Tibo @thsottiaux]

Here is how to enable a 1M-token context window in Codex for GPT-5.6 Sol.

Even though we have tuned the context limit in Codex to be set optimally when it comes to performance and cost, this is a common ask, so here it is documented.

A larger context window lets Codex retain more code, tool output, and conversation history before summarizing older material. You need a model that supports it. And GPT-5.6 Sol, for example, has a documented 1,050,000-token window.

Open ~/.codex/config.toml and add or update these settings at the top level, before any [section] headers:

```
model = "gpt-5.6-sol"
model_context_window = 1000000
model_auto_compact_token_limit = 900000
```

The first setting selects the model. The second tells Codex to use a one-million-token context budget. The third starts automatic history compaction around 900,000 tokens, leaving some headroom. Restart Codex client and start a new session after saving.

To try the configuration for a single CLI session without changing your defaults:

```
codex -m gpt-5.6-sol \
-c model_context_window=1000000 \
-c model_auto_compact_token_limit=900000
```

Have fun, but also know that we tuned the default carefully!

[Anand Swaminathan @anand12100]

@VettriTheatres @studio_scape Rakesh or Krish?