Anand Narayan

@anand_narayan

Singer, Song Writer, Stage Performer, TV Host, Software Engr, Social Worker, Corporate Yoga Trainer & aspiring Skydiver!

USA

Joined June 2009

1.1K Following

916 Followers

1.2K Posts

Pinned Tweet

Anand Narayan @anand_narayan

over 1 year ago

🌊Hundreds came together for a Sunset Meditation on at the iconic Kovalam Beach in Trivandrum, Kerala. The event was organised by Trainers & Volunteers of the Art of Living Foundation as part of the 1st ever World Meditation Day, on 21 Dec 2025 🧘🏻‍♂️🧘🏻‍♀️ #WorldMeditatesWithGurudev

anand_narayan's tweet photo. 🌊Hundreds came together for a Sunset Meditation on at the iconic Kovalam Beach in Trivandrum, Kerala. The event was organised by Trainers & Volunteers of the Art of Living Foundation as part of the 1st ever World Meditation Day, on 21 Dec 2025 🧘🏻‍♂️🧘🏻‍♀️
#WorldMeditatesWithGurudev https://t.co/8JIQIdWIyK

1

37

12

0

702

anand_narayan retweeted

about 2 months ago

The Jews aren’t our enemies! Neither are Christians, Buddhists or any other religion.. Our one & only real enemy is the Wilayat al-Faqih regime in Iran every single Hezbollah & Hamas member, & all those toxic religious organizations. Period. It’s that fucking simple!

569

6K

1K

182

94K

anand_narayan retweeted

ADG PI - INDIAN ARMY

5 months ago

#RepublicDay 2026 02 Days to Go… During OPERATION SINDOOR, the Indian Armed Forces scripted history with indomitable courage, exceptional valour and unwavering resolve. Witness this inspiring saga of bravery and commitment through the short film showcased during the Army Day Parade in Jaipur. @DefenceMinIndia @indiannavy @IAF_MCC

59

3K

550

161

269K

anand_narayan retweeted

ADG PI - INDIAN ARMY

5 months ago

#RepublicDay 2026 Just One Day to Go... As the nation prepares to celebrate #RepublicDay 2026, Indian Army contingents rehearse with precision, pride and relentless dedication. A glimpse of the discipline that defines the #IndianArmy. #YearofNetworkingAndDataCentricity #DecadeofTransformation @DefenceMinIndia @SpokespersonMoD

62

4K

734

193

100K

Who to follow

Karina Michelin

Verified account

@karinamichelin

Journalist, International Correspondent

Verified account

Thinker in Chief @echovme, Digital Marketing & Social Media Trainer @digitalscholar_, Speaker. Lost My Verified Badge to Elon. Wanna Die Creative.

Verified account

Member of Parliament (Rajya Sabha), India | Former Member of Legislative Assembly (MLA), Delhi | Member, BJP | Chartered Accountant

anand_narayan retweeted

Sensei Kraken Zero

@YearOfTheKraken

6 months ago

Statement from the Random Association of Movie Aficionados (RAMA) The Random Association of Movie Aficionados (RAMA) strongly rejects the self-pitying and manipulative statement issued by the Film Critics Guild (FCG) regarding public reaction to certain reviews of the film Dhurandhar. 1. The right to criticise is not a one-way street. Film critics enjoy the absolute freedom to praise, condemn, or mock any film, its makers, and its audience. The audience, in turn, possesses the exact same right to question, criticise, ridicule, or reject the opinions of film critics. If critics believe they alone are entitled to speak while the public must remain silent and grateful, they are living in an authoritarian fantasy, not a democracy. 2. The FCG’s attempt to paint ordinary movie-goers as orchestrating “coordinated abuse” and “targeted attacks” is a deliberate smear. What the FCG calls “harassment” and “hate” is, in the overwhelming majority of cases, nothing more than robust, sometimes angry, disagreement expressed on social media by citizens who feel that a section of English-language critics consistently disparages films that celebrate Indian civilisational pride and nationalist sentiment. Labelling millions of film-loving Indians as an abusive mob simply because they dare to push back is a cheap tactic to avoid accountability and to silence dissent against the critics’ own ideological bias. 3. Let us speak plainly: a significant section of India’s established film critics does exhibit a clear and repeated ideological bias against any cinematic expression of Indian nationalism, Hindu civilisational confidence, or pride in the armed forces. This is not a conspiracy theory; it is an observable pattern visible across years of reviews, articles, and social-media commentary. When films that align with a rooted Indian perspectives are routinely met with scorn, moral lectures, and accusations of “propaganda,” while ideologically opposite films are granted nuance and generosity, the bias is self-evident. The audience has every right to point this out without being accused of “policing opinion.” 4. Nobody is “policing” or “silencing” critics. No critic has been prevented from publishing a single word. No publication has been forced to delete a review by the audience. What is happening is that the audience is finally making its own voice heard loudly, clearly, and in real time. Critics who spent decades enjoying a near-monopoly over cultural discourse are now discovering that the megaphone is no longer theirs alone. That is not intimidation; that is democracy in action. 5. Film critics are not a sacred priesthood above scrutiny. They are citizens like the rest of us, earning a living by offering opinions in public. Their reviews are not holy scripture; they are subject to the same standards of fairness, consistency, and intellectual honesty that they demand of filmmakers. If their work reveals ideological prejudice, the public has every right to call it out just as sharply as critics call out what they perceive as “jingoism” or “toxic masculinity” in films they dislike. The FCG’s statement is less a defence of free speech and more an attempt to shield a privileged clique from the consequences of its own bias. RAMA urges the Film Critics Guild to engage with the substance of the public’s criticism instead of hiding behind victimhood. The audience is not the enemy of criticism; it is the reason criticism exists in the first place. Jai Hind. Random Association of Movie Aficionados (RAMA) 11 December, 2025

YearOfTheKraken's tweet photo. Statement from the Random Association of Movie Aficionados (RAMA)

The Random Association of Movie Aficionados (RAMA) strongly rejects the self-pitying and manipulative statement issued by the Film Critics Guild (FCG) regarding public reaction to certain reviews of the film Dhurandhar.

1. The right to criticise is not a one-way street.
Film critics enjoy the absolute freedom to praise, condemn, or mock any film, its makers, and its audience. The audience, in turn, possesses the exact same right to question, criticise, ridicule, or reject the opinions of film critics. If critics believe they alone are entitled to speak while the public must remain silent and grateful, they are living in an authoritarian fantasy, not a democracy.

2. The FCG’s attempt to paint ordinary movie-goers as orchestrating “coordinated abuse” and “targeted attacks” is a deliberate smear.
What the FCG calls “harassment” and “hate” is, in the overwhelming majority of cases, nothing more than robust, sometimes angry, disagreement expressed on social media by citizens who feel that a section of English-language critics consistently disparages films that celebrate Indian civilisational pride and nationalist sentiment. Labelling millions of film-loving Indians as an abusive mob simply because they dare to push back is a cheap tactic to avoid accountability and to silence dissent against the critics’ own ideological bias.

3. Let us speak plainly: a significant section of India’s established film critics does exhibit a clear and repeated ideological bias against any cinematic expression of Indian nationalism, Hindu civilisational confidence, or pride in the armed forces.
This is not a conspiracy theory; it is an observable pattern visible across years of reviews, articles, and social-media commentary. When films that align with a rooted Indian perspectives are routinely met with scorn, moral lectures, and accusations of “propaganda,” while ideologically opposite films are granted nuance and generosity, the bias is self-evident. The audience has every right to point this out without being accused of “policing opinion.”

4. Nobody is “policing” or “silencing” critics.
No critic has been prevented from publishing a single word. No publication has been forced to delete a review by the audience. What is happening is that the audience is finally making its own voice heard loudly, clearly, and in real time. Critics who spent decades enjoying a near-monopoly over cultural discourse are now discovering that the megaphone is no longer theirs alone. That is not intimidation; that is democracy in action.

5. Film critics are not a sacred priesthood above scrutiny.
They are citizens like the rest of us, earning a living by offering opinions in public. Their reviews are not holy scripture; they are subject to the same standards of fairness, consistency, and intellectual honesty that they demand of filmmakers. If their work reveals ideological prejudice, the public has every right to call it out just as sharply as critics call out what they perceive as “jingoism” or “toxic masculinity” in films they dislike.

The FCG’s statement is less a defence of free speech and more an attempt to shield a privileged clique from the consequences of its own bias. RAMA urges the Film Critics Guild to engage with the substance of the public’s criticism instead of hiding behind victimhood. The audience is not the enemy of criticism; it is the reason criticism exists in the first place.

Jai Hind.
Random Association of Movie Aficionados (RAMA)
11 December, 2025

YearOfTheKraken's tweet photo. Statement from the Random Association of Movie Aficionados (RAMA)

The Random Association of Movie Aficionados (RAMA) strongly rejects the self-pitying and manipulative statement issued by the Film Critics Guild (FCG) regarding public reaction to certain reviews of the film Dhurandhar.

1. The right to criticise is not a one-way street.
Film critics enjoy the absolute freedom to praise, condemn, or mock any film, its makers, and its audience. The audience, in turn, possesses the exact same right to question, criticise, ridicule, or reject the opinions of film critics. If critics believe they alone are entitled to speak while the public must remain silent and grateful, they are living in an authoritarian fantasy, not a democracy.

2. The FCG’s attempt to paint ordinary movie-goers as orchestrating “coordinated abuse” and “targeted attacks” is a deliberate smear.
What the FCG calls “harassment” and “hate” is, in the overwhelming majority of cases, nothing more than robust, sometimes angry, disagreement expressed on social media by citizens who feel that a section of English-language critics consistently disparages films that celebrate Indian civilisational pride and nationalist sentiment. Labelling millions of film-loving Indians as an abusive mob simply because they dare to push back is a cheap tactic to avoid accountability and to silence dissent against the critics’ own ideological bias.

3. Let us speak plainly: a significant section of India’s established film critics does exhibit a clear and repeated ideological bias against any cinematic expression of Indian nationalism, Hindu civilisational confidence, or pride in the armed forces.
This is not a conspiracy theory; it is an observable pattern visible across years of reviews, articles, and social-media commentary. When films that align with a rooted Indian perspectives are routinely met with scorn, moral lectures, and accusations of “propaganda,” while ideologically opposite films are granted nuance and generosity, the bias is self-evident. The audience has every right to point this out without being accused of “policing opinion.”

4. Nobody is “policing” or “silencing” critics.
No critic has been prevented from publishing a single word. No publication has been forced to delete a review by the audience. What is happening is that the audience is finally making its own voice heard loudly, clearly, and in real time. Critics who spent decades enjoying a near-monopoly over cultural discourse are now discovering that the megaphone is no longer theirs alone. That is not intimidation; that is democracy in action.

5. Film critics are not a sacred priesthood above scrutiny.
They are citizens like the rest of us, earning a living by offering opinions in public. Their reviews are not holy scripture; they are subject to the same standards of fairness, consistency, and intellectual honesty that they demand of filmmakers. If their work reveals ideological prejudice, the public has every right to call it out just as sharply as critics call out what they perceive as “jingoism” or “toxic masculinity” in films they dislike.

The FCG’s statement is less a defence of free speech and more an attempt to shield a privileged clique from the consequences of its own bias. RAMA urges the Film Critics Guild to engage with the substance of the public’s criticism instead of hiding behind victimhood. The audience is not the enemy of criticism; it is the reason criticism exists in the first place.

Jai Hind.
Random Association of Movie Aficionados (RAMA)
11 December, 2025

YearOfTheKraken's tweet photo. Statement from the Random Association of Movie Aficionados (RAMA)

The Random Association of Movie Aficionados (RAMA) strongly rejects the self-pitying and manipulative statement issued by the Film Critics Guild (FCG) regarding public reaction to certain reviews of the film Dhurandhar.

1. The right to criticise is not a one-way street.
Film critics enjoy the absolute freedom to praise, condemn, or mock any film, its makers, and its audience. The audience, in turn, possesses the exact same right to question, criticise, ridicule, or reject the opinions of film critics. If critics believe they alone are entitled to speak while the public must remain silent and grateful, they are living in an authoritarian fantasy, not a democracy.

2. The FCG’s attempt to paint ordinary movie-goers as orchestrating “coordinated abuse” and “targeted attacks” is a deliberate smear.
What the FCG calls “harassment” and “hate” is, in the overwhelming majority of cases, nothing more than robust, sometimes angry, disagreement expressed on social media by citizens who feel that a section of English-language critics consistently disparages films that celebrate Indian civilisational pride and nationalist sentiment. Labelling millions of film-loving Indians as an abusive mob simply because they dare to push back is a cheap tactic to avoid accountability and to silence dissent against the critics’ own ideological bias.

3. Let us speak plainly: a significant section of India’s established film critics does exhibit a clear and repeated ideological bias against any cinematic expression of Indian nationalism, Hindu civilisational confidence, or pride in the armed forces.
This is not a conspiracy theory; it is an observable pattern visible across years of reviews, articles, and social-media commentary. When films that align with a rooted Indian perspectives are routinely met with scorn, moral lectures, and accusations of “propaganda,” while ideologically opposite films are granted nuance and generosity, the bias is self-evident. The audience has every right to point this out without being accused of “policing opinion.”

4. Nobody is “policing” or “silencing” critics.
No critic has been prevented from publishing a single word. No publication has been forced to delete a review by the audience. What is happening is that the audience is finally making its own voice heard loudly, clearly, and in real time. Critics who spent decades enjoying a near-monopoly over cultural discourse are now discovering that the megaphone is no longer theirs alone. That is not intimidation; that is democracy in action.

5. Film critics are not a sacred priesthood above scrutiny.
They are citizens like the rest of us, earning a living by offering opinions in public. Their reviews are not holy scripture; they are subject to the same standards of fairness, consistency, and intellectual honesty that they demand of filmmakers. If their work reveals ideological prejudice, the public has every right to call it out just as sharply as critics call out what they perceive as “jingoism” or “toxic masculinity” in films they dislike.

The FCG’s statement is less a defence of free speech and more an attempt to shield a privileged clique from the consequences of its own bias. RAMA urges the Film Critics Guild to engage with the substance of the public’s criticism instead of hiding behind victimhood. The audience is not the enemy of criticism; it is the reason criticism exists in the first place.

Jai Hind.
Random Association of Movie Aficionados (RAMA)
11 December, 2025

YearOfTheKraken's tweet photo. Statement from the Random Association of Movie Aficionados (RAMA)

The Random Association of Movie Aficionados (RAMA) strongly rejects the self-pitying and manipulative statement issued by the Film Critics Guild (FCG) regarding public reaction to certain reviews of the film Dhurandhar.

1. The right to criticise is not a one-way street.
Film critics enjoy the absolute freedom to praise, condemn, or mock any film, its makers, and its audience. The audience, in turn, possesses the exact same right to question, criticise, ridicule, or reject the opinions of film critics. If critics believe they alone are entitled to speak while the public must remain silent and grateful, they are living in an authoritarian fantasy, not a democracy.

2. The FCG’s attempt to paint ordinary movie-goers as orchestrating “coordinated abuse” and “targeted attacks” is a deliberate smear.
What the FCG calls “harassment” and “hate” is, in the overwhelming majority of cases, nothing more than robust, sometimes angry, disagreement expressed on social media by citizens who feel that a section of English-language critics consistently disparages films that celebrate Indian civilisational pride and nationalist sentiment. Labelling millions of film-loving Indians as an abusive mob simply because they dare to push back is a cheap tactic to avoid accountability and to silence dissent against the critics’ own ideological bias.

3. Let us speak plainly: a significant section of India’s established film critics does exhibit a clear and repeated ideological bias against any cinematic expression of Indian nationalism, Hindu civilisational confidence, or pride in the armed forces.
This is not a conspiracy theory; it is an observable pattern visible across years of reviews, articles, and social-media commentary. When films that align with a rooted Indian perspectives are routinely met with scorn, moral lectures, and accusations of “propaganda,” while ideologically opposite films are granted nuance and generosity, the bias is self-evident. The audience has every right to point this out without being accused of “policing opinion.”

4. Nobody is “policing” or “silencing” critics.
No critic has been prevented from publishing a single word. No publication has been forced to delete a review by the audience. What is happening is that the audience is finally making its own voice heard loudly, clearly, and in real time. Critics who spent decades enjoying a near-monopoly over cultural discourse are now discovering that the megaphone is no longer theirs alone. That is not intimidation; that is democracy in action.

5. Film critics are not a sacred priesthood above scrutiny.
They are citizens like the rest of us, earning a living by offering opinions in public. Their reviews are not holy scripture; they are subject to the same standards of fairness, consistency, and intellectual honesty that they demand of filmmakers. If their work reveals ideological prejudice, the public has every right to call it out just as sharply as critics call out what they perceive as “jingoism” or “toxic masculinity” in films they dislike.

The FCG’s statement is less a defence of free speech and more an attempt to shield a privileged clique from the consequences of its own bias. RAMA urges the Film Critics Guild to engage with the substance of the public’s criticism instead of hiding behind victimhood. The audience is not the enemy of criticism; it is the reason criticism exists in the first place.

Jai Hind.
Random Association of Movie Aficionados (RAMA)
11 December, 2025

60

2K

714

112

64K

anand_narayan retweeted

7 months ago

Count yourself lucky that your don’t have these mass murderers as your neighbours. Live in a conflict ridden neighbourhood as ours and you would be more empathetic and less tunnel visioned.

smitaprakash's tweet photo. Count yourself lucky that your don’t have these mass murderers as your neighbours. Live in a conflict ridden neighbourhood as ours and you would be more empathetic and less tunnel visioned. https://t.co/oFEXenZSkr

136

13K

3K

179

334K

anand_narayan retweeted

@IndicMeenakshi

7 months ago

Macaulay wrote to his father in 1836, 'No Hindoo, who has received an English education..remains sincerely attached to his religion... if our plans of education are followed up, there will not be a single idolater ... in Bengal thirty years hence...i rejoice the prospect.'

IndicMeenakshi's tweet photo. Macaulay wrote to his father in 1836,

'No Hindoo, who has received an English education..remains sincerely attached to his religion... if our plans of education are followed up, there will not be a single idolater ... in Bengal thirty years hence...i rejoice the prospect.' https://t.co/RkLf3czkev

86

4K

2K

578

89K

anand_narayan retweeted

7 months ago

#WATCH | Kozhikode, Kerala: Former Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) regional director KK Muhammed says, "...I had said Muslims should give up 2 more historical places and these are the temples also - Mathura which is the birthplace of Lord Krishna and Gyanvapi which is associated with Lord Shiva. So, these are the two important places which Muslims should hand over to the Hindu community for constructing magnificent Hindu temples. Because these 2 important places are as important for Hindus as Mecca and Medina are for Muslims..." "Muslims should appreciate the fact that even after giving a separate country Pakistan for the Muslim community, if India is a secular country today, it is only because of Hindu majority. Had it been a Muslim majority country, it would never have been a secular country. So, this fact also Muslims should realise and they should understand it. There should be certain gestures from their side...You should not speak about all these things with communist historians because in the earlier case also it was the communist historians like Irfan Habib and a few JNU people who had complicated the issue. Section of the Muslim community was ready to handover the Ram Janmbhoomi also because I had spoken to many people. So, we should not bring in these communist historians, they would complicate the issue and poison the minds of Muslims. Hindu leadership and Muslim leadership should come to certain terms and conditions. At the same time, what Hindus should do is that beyond these three, they should not go behind every mosque..."

260

14K

4K

1K

611K

anand_narayan retweeted

7 months ago

I am voting for him in 2030.

109

4K

1K

510

129K

anand_narayan retweeted

7 months ago

#SharpBySwarajya | They didn’t just conquer temples. They erased civilisations. Egypt’s gods are museum exhibits now. Greece’s live in poetry. Rome’s survived as planets and weekdays. The Aztec and Inca pantheons exist only in anthropology papers. Every ancient pagan civilisation—without exception—was either absorbed, converted, or exterminated by monotheism’s 2,000-year expansion. Every one, except India. Here's why: https://t.co/N2xyvA3X5c

SwarajyaMag's tweet photo. #SharpBySwarajya | They didn’t just conquer temples. They erased civilisations.

Egypt’s gods are museum exhibits now. Greece’s live in poetry. Rome’s survived as planets and weekdays. The Aztec and Inca pantheons exist only in anthropology papers.

Every ancient pagan civilisation—without exception—was either absorbed, converted, or exterminated by monotheism’s 2,000-year expansion.

Every one, except India.

Here's why: https://t.co/N2xyvA3X5c

35

4K

1K

502

90K

anand_narayan retweeted

Iris Seraphina 

@iris_seraphina

7 months ago

Their reactions are so cute!! 🥰

33

12K

1K

1K

251K

anand_narayan retweeted

7 months ago

Buddy, you’re wrong most of the time, but I love how you’ve turned that into a career. 😏🙌🏽

898

55K

8K

1K

3M

anand_narayan retweeted

Mirwaiz Manzil-Office of Mirwaiz-e-Kashmir

7 months ago

Sri Sri Ravi Shankar @Gurudev Calls on @MirwaizKashmir in Srinagar Srinagar, November 13, 2025: Renowned spiritual leader and founder of the Art of Living Foundation, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, called on Mirwaiz-e-Kashmir Dr. Moulvi Muhammad Umar Farooq at his residence in Srinagar. During the cordial meeting, both leaders discussed the importance of peace, compassion, and inter-faith harmony in today’s world. Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, visiting Kashmir after seven years, expressed happiness at being back in the Valley and lauded its spiritual and cultural heritage as a symbol of coexistence. Mirwaiz Umar Farooq welcomed him and reiterated that the institution of the Mirwaiz remains committed to peace and dialogue as the most humane and effective means of addressing issues and resolving differences.Both leaders agreed that injustice and disempowerment lead to radicalisation that threatens peace. Mirwaiz also appreciated Sri Sri Ravi Shankar’s recent anti-drug outreach in the Valley. Referring to Sri Sri Ravi Shankar’s upcoming visit to the Central Jail Srinagar, Mirwaiz stressed that a compassionate and humane approach must guide efforts for the release of political prisoners and youth, he urged the leader to play his role in this. Both leaders agreed that sustained dialogue and mutual understanding are essential to promote peace and human dignity.

63

427

96

46

63K

Anand Narayan @anand_narayan

8 months ago

@SwarupChattrjee @Bhanujgd @ArtofLiving @Gurudev JGD 🫶

0

1

0

0

12

anand_narayan retweeted

@i_am_a_sadhak @i_am_a_sadhak

8 months ago

What is so Special about the Sanyam Program in @ArtofLiving? Why one should Continue the Sanyam Practice for 90 Days? 🌸 Question - Gurudev, why should we continue the Sanyam practice for 90 days? What are the benefits of doing it? @Gurudev Sri Sri Ravi Shankar ji - You know what it does? It brings beauty, grace, and strength. Yes — beauty, grace, and strength. Have you seen your faces in the mirror lately? Don’t you look more beautiful? And look at other participants — don’t they look different, as if they just came from a beauty salon? Everyone’s face is glowing! That’s what this practice does — it brings a genuine smile and true happiness from within. Now, some people may look beautiful outwardly — like those in beauty pageants — but do they have grace? Not always. Grace is something deeper — it’s the positive vibration that radiates from within. Beauty and grace must be accompanied by strength. If small things upset you and make you run like a chicken, what’s the use of that beauty? True strength means resilience — the ability to take life’s blows and still remain centered. Where there is Satyam (truth), beauty arises. Where there is Shivam (transcendence), beauty naturally follows. So Sanyam brings you inner and outer beauty, grace, strength, and the resilience to face life without being shaken. This is your Kaya Sampatti — your physical wealth — the wealth of beauty, grace, strength, and stability that no one can take away. Take part in Sanyam Program soon using the link below ❤️ https://t.co/xukdFo8E9j #Gurudev #ArtOfLiving #Sanyam #SanyamSutra #InnerStrength #Grace #Beauty #Truth #Shivam #Wisdom #Resilience #Spirituality

0

130

34

26

2K

anand_narayan retweeted

9 months ago

Govinda Ram Bhajan mashup 🥰 This will give you goosebumps 🔥🚩🔥🚩🔥🚩🔥

52

4K

1K

1K

65K

anand_narayan retweeted

9 months ago

“Witness the cosmic power of Vishnu’s Dashavatara in vintage manuscript style. 🖤

82

10K

1K

2K

150K

anand_narayan retweeted

9 months ago

Israel has been firmly with India through thick and thin. Asking for cancellation of our diplomatic ties with such a friend based on a conflict which has nothing to do with India, by a CM who has never opened his mouth against China's blatant aggression in Dokhlam and Galwan, is utterly shameful.

1K

43K

8K

951

2M

anand_narayan retweeted

Astro Sharmistha

@AstroSharmistha

10 months ago

Shri Narendra Modiji may face health issue as well pressure from supportive parties in his Mars/Ketu Bhukti. Demands of alliance may bring some pressure & disappointment to him. But he will handle everything maturely and complete his tenure as PM. Chances are high that he may even contest the next Loksabha Election in 2028/29. No way @narendramodi will resign in 2026. If health issue goes out of control he may think of stepping down in 2027. Before that he will bring back POK for sure. @BJP4India

487

8K

864

658

634K

anand_narayan retweeted

Sunil | IIT Kharagpur | @ArtofLiving Faculty 🧘‍♂️

10 months ago

Divine moment at the @ArtofLiving @BangaloreAshram 🌺 After the sacred Maharudra Puja, @Gurudev Sri Sri ji blessed devotees with his serene presence, lovingly offering prasadam to the ashram’s gentle souls, Indrani & Maheshwara 🐘✨ Truly a sight of grace, love, and devotion.

2

77

11

1

1K

Last Seen Users on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users