Gimasen | StarknetMonk

one of eight starkent users
coin collector | community member

[Gimasen | StarknetMonk @anarralop]

shirmp portfolio
will keep adding from my 9-5 income
someday I will make it 🤞

open for gift
ebeggar address:
0x052DF9D4ddA8c850cf71C645Bc06b270dEAC9a7B990B8C0dFdA83Ab902877009

-StarknetMonk

[Monk 🛡️ @ShieldedMonk]

Zcash has officially retired me.

I said four-digit $ZEC would come faster than people expected. Now we're above $1,200.

Still holding over 19,000 $ZEC in spot, currently worth more than $24M. Pretty comfortable staying there.

Aged like wine.

[Gimasen | StarknetMonk @anarralop]

life savings got liquidated at @extendedapp last year but got only 105 points

[Gimasen | StarknetMonk @anarralop]

first paragraph: sounds professional and helping

second paragraph: meh

just by using "richest man in crypto" I can smell your intention.

"join hands" my ass. how irocnic.

[Star_OKX @star_okx]

我真心不想在竞争对手遭遇危机的时候批评他们。我真正希望的是，我们能够与他们携手合作，共同提高安全标准，更好地保护整个加密行业。

但我不得不说，那位自称已经不再管理币安的“币圈首富”（你们真的相信吗？）最近接受的采访，实在让我感到恶心。

整场采访充斥着胡说八道和误导性言论。他似乎在淡化自身应承担的责任，甚至试图通过贬低传统银行的安全性，为自己的失败寻找借口。

在这样一场危机中，我们本应看到的是责任担当和行业领导力。但这场采访给人的感觉，却是在不断推卸责任、转移焦点。

这绝不是我们这个行业需要的领导力。

自从事件发生以来，这位“币圈首富”似乎就一直停不下来：

1. 社交媒体上最活跃的人之一。 在整场危机期间，他可以说是币安相关人士中在社交媒体上发声最多、最活跃的一个。

2. 还有时间和马斯克吵架。 在如此严重的安全危机期间，他居然还有精力与 Elon Musk（@elonmusk）争论 SpaceX 股票投资的问题。

3. 反复强调“只有2%的资金流出币安”。 仿佛这个数字就能回答大家对平台安全性的根本质疑。

4. 继续开展营销活动吸引用户存款。 即使危机仍在持续，吸引新资金流入的营销活动也没有停止。

5. 试图暗示传统银行的安全性更差。 一个自称专业的加密行业领导者，怎么能做出如此具有误导性的比较？传统银行与加密交易所面对的威胁模型、攻击面以及安全事故的后果，都存在根本性差异。脱离这些背景进行简单比较，是极其不负责任的。

6. 几乎每次发声，都似乎把一位怀孕的女性推到危机最前线。 而自己则反复加上同一句免责声明：“我已经不管理币安了。”

与此同时，整个加密行业却在为这场危机付出代价：

1. 比特币价格据报道从约81,000美元跌至75,000美元。 市场在动荡中遭受了明显冲击。

2. 数十亿美元的杠杆仓位遭到清算。 市场波动引发了大规模的强制平仓。

3. 整个加密行业的公信力可能再次受到重创。 传统资本市场、机构投资者以及全球监管机构，可能因此对整个行业的安全性和可信度产生更深的疑虑。

经历了这一切，他们所谓的“多层安全防御体系”，如今看起来越来越像一个笑话。

我们的行业需要的，不是更多的借口，不是更多的公关话术，而是真正的合作、真正的责任担当，以及切实有效的用户资产保护和安全标准建设。

少一些推卸责任，少一些营销包装，多一些真正的安全投入和行业协作。

这才是我更愿意投入时间和精力去推动的事情。

即使是竞争对手，我也真心希望我们能够携手把这件事做好。

[Gimasen | StarknetMonk @anarralop]

@Decentralizd why not?

[Gimasen | StarknetMonk @anarralop]

Every post I see, it's either North Korea or Binance themselves. I didn't even saw anyone mentioned it might be another
hackers. Are y'all really that dumb narrow minded people???? Or y'all just hating on binance because they're the best and most successful cex?

[Zach @CryptoZachLA]

To put this into perspective, North Korea always owns their shit and claims their hacks.

2 Options here:

1. They are lying because they don’t want Trump to force them to send it back otherwise who knows what he’ll do for his asian butt-buddy CZ.

2. They didn’t do it (explains why no $BNB was stolen) and CZ is corrupt(we’ve known this) and ONCE AGAIN did this to his users on purpose to plug a hole within Binance or launder funds stolen from last years $50 Billion mishap.

I’m inclined to believe option 2 because that’s the best path for more users to send Binance to 0 and CZ back to jail.

[Binance @binance]

Trust is earned, and we’re grateful for the confidence you place in us. #ThankYouBinancians

This campaign reflects that appreciation: eligible users can claim a 100 USDC Spot fee rebate voucher, share 20,000,000 USDC, and earn up to 10% APR.

Learn more 👉 https://t.co/11kIiwtH9P

[Crypto Bitlord @crypto_bitlord7]

Binance saved this industry.

If they couldn’t shrug this off,

We’d be going to zero.

Think about that next time you want to hate on CZ.

[Gimasen | StarknetMonk @anarralop]

Rekt damn! chart looks 10.10

$CFG

[Gimasen | StarknetMonk @anarralop]

cyrpto is down
my portfolio is down
but a little bit consider it as opportunity to buy cheaper

[Gimasen | StarknetMonk @anarralop]

pump it

[Gimasen | StarknetMonk @anarralop]

seeing a lot of drain lately
are we witnessing ai attack?

[Gimasen | StarknetMonk @anarralop]

@ready_co hi ready. can we still work on this?

[Gimasen | StarknetMonk @anarralop]

@ready_co how do I access these other wallets (ready wallet accounts)? I don't have seed phrase of them nor backups.

[Gimasen | StarknetMonk @anarralop]

>planned to dca everytime there is a dump
>crypto market is dumping rn but I'm afraid it's going to dump more
>when you feel market will pump more, it will dump. feeling to dump more, it bounces.
>conclusion: going against feeling. stick to plan. BUY NOW.

[Gimasen | StarknetMonk @anarralop]

straight to zero, including $pump
make crypto great again

[Royal Kane @RoyalKane_X]

Update $PONS again !

PONS RECORDS ALL-TIME LOW REVENUE

Revenue for the $PONS launchpad has plummeted from a peak of $11M to just $30K per day.

In this case, I think we should buy it at entry below $0.13

[Gimasen | StarknetMonk @anarralop]

A little worried my near investment is going to zero

[Çizi @cizi31]

🚨 What Dominic is doing is worse than a hacker attack on $NEAR’s reputation.

Instead of handling his concerns professionally and talking directly to NEAR’s founders, he chooses to attack them publicly on X.

This is not how serious founders behave. Very sad to see him lose his professionalism.

[Gimasen | StarknetMonk @anarralop]

ios vs android
iphone vs samsung/xiaomi/huawei

iphone fanatics too dumb to compare

[Jason Updates @WeenUpdates]

Jason compares IRL streaming with the new iPhone Duo vs Android 🔥

[Gimasen | StarknetMonk @anarralop]

buy $STRK

[Gimasen | StarknetMonk @anarralop]

make crypto great again. only solution is killing pumpfun $PUMP

[Gimasen | StarknetMonk @anarralop]

grok says $ICP is the most undervalued crypto project in terms of pure tech

go ask grok which project has the lowest mcap to tech ratio

[Gimasen | StarknetMonk @anarralop]

$NEAR is currently falling faster than $ICP

[Gimasen | StarknetMonk @anarralop]

Agree
But let us all revisit all of this comparison s after 1, 5 or 10 years

[Our Crypto Talk @ourcryptotalk]

$NEAR vs $ICP

Dom may be right about the cryptography, but he's losing the only scoreboard that pays anyone.

> Chain TVL: $244M vs $12M
> Below ATH: -76% vs -99.7%
> Market cap / TVL: ~25x vs ~100x
> Since Feb : 4.3x vs flat

👉 What Dom actually said about NEAR

Dom shared a PhD engineer's review calling Confidential Intents a permissioned instance with trusted operators, no public code and no public operator list.

He later escalated to calling it snake oil and floated legal action over vetKeys, putting his odds at 70% to 85%, though all of that remains allegation.

👉 Where the criticism lands and where not

On the trust model he has a point, since a private shard with a handful of permissioned validators and a TEE bridge is not threshold cryptography.

Disclosure is weaker ground, because NEAR described the permissioned shard and TEE bridge publicly from its February launch.

👉 What the market chose to pay for

Confidential Intents now holds $171M, up 6.4x since June, though part of that growth was incentivized. All of ICP holds about $12M.

👉 My take

You could argue users never asked for the purest design, they asked for private swaps with compliance built in, and NEAR shipped that first.

Dom's engineering points deserve a technical answer, but a founder attacking a rival from 99.7% below ATH will always get read as marketing.

ICP's own docs also say standard subnet state is readable by node operators, so neither side offers privacy by default.

If you had to pick, does cryptographic purity still matter when the market keeps paying for the practical version?