@MrRexPatrick@JAParker29 This is coming from the same guy who has complained that we haven't gotten the subs since the day AUKUS was announced, and every day since, and finds himself marching with lockstep with The Greens and the PRC. Didn't she block you by the way? Unseemly
@MrRexPatrick Mr Patrick, ever the opportunist, tries to spin being wrong into yet another pro China narrative.
He thinks we can imagine up 20 AIB subs for 20 billion when other nations are paying 5
@SatPaper Clearly has not watched any of their Ukraine War coverage with Prof Michael Clarke.
Meanwhilst SatPap fellates some local nobodies every week.
Mr Patrick evidently either missed the Singapore announcement or is salty about it. We're getting extant submarines. "Second hand" is a manipulative colloquialism designed to get around the fact the subs have passed sea trials and are operational.
Now you've had to resort to ad hominems "hurr nobody understands project management but MEEEE".
Meanwhile you use an aggregate forward estimate over 25 years as if it were an off the shelf price tag, so you can brown-nose the greens.
Tell us is your account monetized? One wonders if you're simply getting paid by twitter to mouth opinions beneficial to the PLAN.
After a point you're so routinely deceptive as to be outright dishonest. It's your integrity and credibility you're sinking, the boats are coming, and you'd throw the whole nation under the bus just avoid admitting you're wrong.
Mr Patrick evidently either missed the Singapore announcement or is salty about it. We're getting extant submarines. "Second hand" is a manipulative colloquialism designed to get around the fact the subs have passed sea trials and are operational.
Now you've had to resort to ad hominems "hurr nobody understands project management but MEEEE".
Meanwhile you use an aggregate forward estimate over 25 years as if it were an off the shelf price tag, so you can brown-nose the greens.
Tell us is your account monetized? One wonders if you're simply getting paid by twitter to mouth opinions beneficial to the PLAN.
After a point you're so routinely deceptive as to be outright dishonest. It's your integrity and credibility you're sinking, the boats are coming, and you'd throw the whole nation under the bus just avoid admitting you're wrong.
That's Labor for you. We're making housing more affordable.
But without affecting prices, homeowners, please keep voting for us.
Well, how do you make housing more affordable?
As predicted, pressure from property investors and renters will prevent Labor from any meaningful action on prices.
Maybe they plan to inflate their way out?
https://t.co/fSBArnayhm
Australia now to get in-service Virginia class subs https://t.co/TfBwRmdUTG via @ukdefjournal
Appears the naysayers are wrong, as usual. When you go to the Greens with your defence issues, you get Sea Patrol levels of understanding.
Wonder if Mr Patrick will eat is proverbial hat, or simply continue to collect money from twitter whilst promoting the interests of foreign powers.
@DrCraigEmerson@AlboMP aren't most older owners going to get a marginal rate anyways? Apparently the means testing doesn't apply until 1600 p/W is exceeded, meaning young people will be paying more CGT than older owners, like yourselves, who'll scrape onto the pension through tax strategies
You don't own the rights to minerals on your land.
Any politician who calls it "our resources" is lying to you. If politicians and activists truly thought these resources belonged to the people of the country, they'd grant you mineral rights to your land.
That's not going to happen. In fact, you can lose your land if you don't give up the mineral rights in some cases.
People calling for additional taxes don't care about sharing or fairing. They expect something in return, a political quid pro quo, an ROI or a hand out.
Money to the government goes out of the economy. You might get a percentage of that back as spending but that's a year later and with a high percentage of waste.
The answer to Australia's economic problems is less waste, less misallocation and less market speculation.
https://t.co/YXAT8oW0eI
Here's something really pernicious about someone whom aligns with parties that say we shouldn't use these resources, supports activists who do everything to block mineral exploration and exploitation, want to tax these companies to the hilt, block spending on public services, and then talk about how "we're not getting a fair share of these trillions of theoretical resource dollars in federal coffers" ( WA turned a surplus off their resources boom).
What does the Federal Government want tax for? All that bulk billing, welfare and pension rises, infrastructure spending and defence spending, or tax cuts for the not-rich?
The Albanese Government wants more tax whilst delivering less. You're in the sheltered ten percent who wants to add defence spending to that list.
Here's something really pernicious about someone whom aligns with parties that say we shouldn't use these resources, supports activists who do everything to block mineral exploration and exploitation, want to tax these companies to the hilt, block spending on public services, and then talk about how "we're not getting a fair share of these trillions of theoretical resource dollars in federal coffers" ( WA turned a surplus off their resources boom).
What does the Federal Government want tax for? All that bulk billing, welfare and pension rises, infrastructure spending and defence spending, or tax cuts for the not-rich?
The Albanese Government wants more tax whilst delivering less. You're in the sheltered ten percent who wants to add defence spending to that list.
He should.
At least he stands for something.
The Teals lecture everyone on climate change, whilst locking liquid natural gas into our energy mixture.
The world is transitioning to nuclear energy and the teals blocked it to protect gas industry shareholders like Simon Holmes a Court.
Quality of life under Teals is demonstrably worse.
My initial assessment was that this would happen in about 4 years. What has happened? It took Germany millions of soldiers to occupy the Ukraine in WW2. There were always huge gaps in the line.
It destroyed their army. Not just armed resistance, but the snow, the dust and the mud. In Bagration, an armed force ten times the size of the Ru Expeditionary Force was infiltrated, encircled and annihilated.
After the 2022 counteroffensive - it was only a matter of time. Russia needed a force ten times the size to just seize central Ukraine.
Occupying all of Ukraine would still require a million troops. Even if somehow Russia were to win now, the guerilla campaign would annihilate Russia's lifeblood.
Now, Russia's armed forces are just a punching bag for Ukraine's Lethal Autonomous Weapons systems test-tube.
All those poor hopeless bastards are just living in a Western test tube for autonomous weapons.
Russia has conveniently extended its armed forces out from under its nuclear umbrella. It's now a punching bag.
The West needs to wait for Ukraine's 100 Days. There will be a pressure to make peace when the RuAF reach the tipping point but we shouldn't make the same mistakes that the Allies made in 1918. We need to ensure that the Russian Army is utterly crushed and attrited, and buffer zones secured along the 2014 borders.
Territorial concessions should be granted to China and North Korea from Russia - the Federation should be broken up. Everything east of the Urals should be removed from Federation control.
Eastern Republics should be granted independence. The Moscow - Leningrad axis should be reduced a rump state. Siberais hould be some kind of international national park.
The Russian Federation should be forced to disarm its nuclear arsenal. This will be accomplished by forcing territorial concessions to Russia's former allies.
Ukraine Just Took the Initiative in the War https://t.co/FOPDc8ysbA via @YouTube
Correlation doesn't imply causation.
Credlin was Abbott's chief of staff. You'd have to ignore LNP electoral victories for ten years in davour of the past two (disastrous) ALP terms for this thesis to be correct.
It's easy to criticise public figures on the basis of your partisan views and a few soundbites - but it doesn't mean you know the person - or that you're in their intended demo.
What's far more difficult is to understand, relate and even synthesise policy, environments and outcomes.
Perhaps spend more time on the latter rather than making assumptions based on some soundbites. That's just celebrity news with ugly people.
Correlation doesn't imply causation.
Credlin was Abbott's chief of staff. You'd have to ignore LNP electoral victories for ten years in davour of the past two (disastrous) ALP terms for this thesis to be correct.
It's easy to criticise public figures on the basis of your partisan views and a few soundbites - but it doesn't mean you know the person - or that you're in their intended demo.
What's far more difficult is to understand, relate and even synthesise policy, environments and outcomes.
Perhaps spend more time on the latter rather than making assumptions based on some soundbites. That's just celebrity news with ugly people.
@JamesOnekaka@ellymelly Left wing right wing is a 3rd Estate thing fromthe French Revolution/ early democracy.
You might be confusing the plebeians versus patricians in Rome.