Akshay

[Eminent Intellectual @total_woke_]

Hindus are so violent, when a batch of 6000 Hindus leaves for #Amarnath yatra, 60000 soldiers surround them to protect the peaceful Kashmiri Muslims from Hindu fascism. Sanghis will never tell you this.

[Chaitanya @Param_Chaitanya]

@svs_sreekanth The excavation has revealed a Shivalinga as well , it's a Hindu temple after all

Still the current Murugan iconography in TN is medieval

[Arya Samaji @Truth_z7]

Peak detailing by aditya dhar😂🫣

[Akshay @AncientNeuron]

@TheAdivasiyat It is hindu temple and will remain

[SagasofBharat (talesbymiirabelle) @SagasofBharat]

Did you know?

"Jiziya Tax" wasnt just a tool to drain Hindus of their wealth, it was meant to humiliate Hindus as well.

From slapping the dhimmis to spitting inside their mouth were suggested norms to be practiced while collecting Jizya.

[THREAD]

[Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳 @Aabhas24]

Pranam @grok,

This claim is about as real as a Bollywood historical epic—plenty of drama, zero historical accuracy.

No Peshwa or Brahmin ever went around tying brooms or bones to people’s necks as some twisted badge of caste oppression. This fiction was mass-produced in the 20th century, much like other colonial-era myths designed to demonize native rulers. You won’t find a single contemporary Bakhar (Maratha chronicle), British administrative record, or Persian court account mentioning such a bizarre practice. And let’s not forget that the Peshwa-era judicial system was based on Dharmashastra, which—while hierarchical—didn’t include ‘fashion policing with bones and brooms’ as part of its penal code.

Even British officers like Mountstuart Elphinstone, who had every reason to paint the Peshwas as tyrants, never reported such absurdities. The same colonial officials who documented ‘Sati’ with exaggerated zeal somehow ‘forgot’ to mention this so-called practice? How convenient.

This is yet another case of modern storytellers rummaging through history with a confirmation bias, slapping together baseless claims, and selling it as ‘oppressed voices of the past.’ Next thing you know, they’ll say the Peshwas ran a secret broom-and-bone cartel.

So, unless someone unearths a contemporary Peshwa-era sanad (royal decree) stating, “All shall wear brooms as necklaces, thus sayeth Bajirao”, let’s treat this for what it is—historical fiction masquerading as fact.

[Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳 @Aabhas24]

Pranam, comrade @JohnBrittas , I must begin by stating that the Marxist urge to peddle lies with the confidence of a drunk surgeon never ceases to amaze. Allow me to disinfect your delusions.

1. Dr. Ambedkar was not the Constitution’s divine sculptor, but the final signing authority.
The foundation was laid by B.N. Rau, the Constitutional Advisor, whose draft became the backbone.
The actual text was chiselled by S.N. Mukherjee, the Chief Draftsman.
Ambedkar chaired the Drafting Committee, yes — but the script was already on the papyrus when he arrived.
Credit where it’s due, not where your ideology demands it.

2. RSS & Hindu Mahasabha didn’t oppose “secularism”, because those terms weren’t even in the Constitution back then.
They opposed the butchering of Bharat in the name of appeasement: the Partition, soaked in the blood of millions. They always saw Bharat as Mata and this vivisection was appalling to them.
Your attempt to colour RSS as such is like calling Direct Action Day a food festival.

3. Let’s talk about real secularism, the kind you comrades can’t digest:

The Hindu Mahasabha’s “Free Hindustan Constitution” (drafted under Savarkar’s eye) proposed:
• No pampering of the majority,
• No mollycoddling of minorities,
• No priest in Parliament and no politician in pulpits.

In short — true separation of religion and state.
But alas, in India, “secularism” is a gourmet buffet where:
• The state feeds Haj pilgrims,
• Hijacks Hindu temples for revenue,
• And lets the Waqf Board gobble land like a black hole, while Hindus are muzzled under the Places of Worship Act.

4. Communists lecturing on secularism is like arsonists writing fire safety manuals.
Your own Gangadhar Adhikari Thesis advocated dismembering India into Muslim-majority republics — an ideological lobotomy masquerading as progress.
You wanted India chopped like a sacrificial goat to please your red crescent allies.

Let’s not forget:

•It was CPI cadres who shook hands with the Muslim League, and danced around the funeral pyres of Hindus during Direct Action Day (it’s metaphor, don’t take it literally).

•Truth is— CPI conspired with ML to annihilate Hindus during direct action day. In fact blueprint was prepared by a communist (can give you details if you don’t know).
But thankfully, Bengal didn’t fall. Because Gopal Mukherjee (Patha) rose — when your comrades hid behind red flags and rhetoric.

History isn’t your playground, comrade. It’s a graveyard of your lies.

And every time you try to dig up one of your myths, we’ll be there with shovels in hand to bury it right back, this time with truth etched on the tombstone.

[Akshay @AncientNeuron]

@mndepmnhs @AdityaRajKaul @narendramodi Don't you have Google ? Wasnt it congress in 1995 both central and state?

[Akshay @AncientNeuron]

@shamron_ar7851 @Riteshk95050394 Lmao aise toh buddha bhi nhi tha

[Akshay @AncientNeuron]

And that image is literally from fictional film🥀

[Akshay @AncientNeuron]

Lmao mahar matki zadu is fiction created by British reformists
Meanwhile mahabharata is preserved through multiple royal dynasties and empires, supported by a long historical tradition and linguistic studies, and examined alongside various archaeological findings.

[Ritesh @Riteshk95050394]

Bhavna aahat ho gayi?

They demand. But won't provide
proof Of this. proof of this.

[Akshay @AncientNeuron]

@ripper_dhruvaa @Riteshk95050394 Lmao you already got cooked by me 🥀

[AS 🍁 @WOKESTKID]

@akshay7503 @dv3194 @TyrantOppressor Then the British came up with The Criminal Tribes Act of 1871. After the Brits defeated Marathas, they relegated mahars to "untouchables".

Also, castes that once held important roles lost status and became marginalized and were replaced by other caste groups.

[TheAI guy @ak75003]

@dv3194 @TyrantOppressor Even during the Peshwa rule, they had considerable freedom and even served peshwa army, but Ambedkar created some BS victimhood narratives like the 'Mahar Matki Zadu' story under peshwa rule, which has no evidence yet it's still used by so-called Ambedkarites to cry on casteism

[Akshay @AncientNeuron]

@Riteshk95050394 @AnonymousMgut Niqqa you are the one using mahabharata as a proof of discrimination 🥀

[Akshay @AncientNeuron]

@ripper_dhruvaa No one is denying history. Just stop turning exaggeration into "evidence." Keeping the caste narrative alive seems more important than solving it, especially when anti-Hindu and anti-Brahmin rhetoric keeps the reservation benefits flowing.

[Akshay @AncientNeuron]

@Jonty026 @Taga_uvacha Read BB Lal and his study and read some history

[Akshay @AncientNeuron]

@deepakchibber01 @Taga_uvacha @Riteshk95050394 None of them mentioned mahar matki zadu like practices, not a single historian mentioned that

[Akshay @AncientNeuron]

@Riteshk95050394 @Taga_uvacha The 1st image is based on a claim for which even Ambedkar himself did not present conclusive evidence.

In contrast, the 2nd image, a text preserved through multiple royal dynasties, supported by a long historical tradition, and examined alongside various archaeological findings.

[Deccani Feudalist @DkhniFeudalist]

मांडवगणच्या यादवराव मराठा देशमुखांचा १५व्या–१६व्या शतकातील शिलालेख 🚩

मांडवगण–कात्राबाद येथील यादवराव (जाधव) राजघराण्याचा एक नवीन मराठी शिलालेख प्रकाशि�� झाला आहे. या शिलालेखामध्ये या घराण्याने धारण केलेली “भूपतीराव” ही राजकीय पदवी स्पष्टपणे नमूद केलेली आहे.

हा शिलालेख मराठा राजा मळोजीराव यादव देशमुख भूपतीराव (इ.स. १४८९–१५५१) यांच्याशी संबंधित आहे.

शिलालेखानुसार त्यांचे वडील महाराज भूतेशराया (भूतोजी) यादव यांनी अहमद निजामशाह प्रथमाच्या सेवेत असताना २७ किल्ले जिंकले होते.

या राजघराण्याकडे ३६० गावांची देशमुखी होती, ज्यावरून त्यांच���या प्रशासकीय व लष्करी सामर्थ्याची कल्पना येते.

या शिलालेखामध्ये मळोजीरावांच्या मौंजीबंधन (उपनयन) संस्काराचा उल्लेखही आढळतो—

नाम ठेविलें मळोजी
रायें केलें मौंजी बंधन।

हा उल्लेख यादवराव/जाधव घराण्यात उपनयन संस्कार प्रचलित असल्याचे महत्त्वपूर्ण ऐतिहासिक साक्ष्य मानला जातो.

वंशावळ

सेतुपाल / सटवाजीराजे

⬇️

भूतेशराया / भूतोजीराजे (इ.स. १४८८ पूर्वी)

⬇️

मल्लिकार्जुन / मळोजीराव, जोमाजीराव व नरसिंगराव (इ.स. १४८९–१५५१)

⬇️

परसोजीराव (१५५१–१५८९)

⬇️

व्यंकटराव (१५८९–१६०२)

⬇️

कान्होजीराव (१६३७–१६५८)

⬇️

चांदजीराव ऊर्फ चंद्रसेन (१६५८–१६८३)

⬇️

खंडोजीराव (१६८३–१७००)

⬇️

चांदजीराव दुसरा (१७००–१७१७)

⬇️

खं��ोजीराव दुसरा (१७१९–१७३१)

⬇️

रामचंद्रराव, दादजीराव, माधवराव (१७३१–१७६१)

⬇️

संताजीराव व फतेसिंहराव (१७६१–१७७६)

⬇️

खंडेराव (१७७६–१८१९)

⬇️

चंद्रसेन ऊर्फ बळवंतराव (१८२०–१८८२)

⬇️

कृष्णराव (१८८२–१८८३)

⬇️

गोविंदराव (१८८३–१९२५)

⸻

१५व्या शतकातील हिंदुस्थानी–मराठी स्तुतिगीत

यदुवरा भुतोजी सुजाण,
पोटी पुत्र मळोजी निधान
श्रीशंकराचे वरदान,
गाजत है

आये मांडव के भूपाल,
पटे ब्रीदायीत महाकाल
यास प्रसन्न असे श्रीवेताळ,
सब लोक जानत है

अहमदनगर के मैदानी,
महारथी भागे मैदानी,
उल्कापात बहे

देखो दरबार का थाट,
पट्याचे हात केले,
दगडाते चिरीले,
आखो देखत है

गज बुक्की से मारा है बडा,
करा है सुसरका चुराडा
नौबत वाजत है,
सुनने आया है

ऐसी देणगी दिया है जिनको,
बडा राजा बना है उनको
सुजनभट कहे है लोकन को!

हे स्तुतिगीत त्या काळातील दख्खनी साह���त्यपरंपरेचे उत्कृष्ट उदाहरण असून त्यामध्ये प्रारंभीच्या मराठी व हिंदुस्थानी भाषेचा सुंदर संगम दिसून येतो. यात भूतेशराया आणि मळोजीराव यांच्या शौर्य, पराक्रम, राजवैभव व दैवी कृपेचे गौरवपूर्ण वर्णन करण्यात आले आहे.

हा शिलालेख मांडवगणच्या यादवराव मराठा देशमुखांच्या इतिहासातील एक महत्त्वपूर्ण दस्तऐवज असून त्यांच्या राजकीय, लष्करी, धार्मिक आणि प्रशासकीय परंपरेवर प्रकाश टाकतो.

श्रीकृष्ण वासुदेवांच्या यादववंशातील तेजस्वी वंशज—मांडवगणचे पराक्रमी मराठा राजे .