@RealTalk900 Bottom. Putting aside the fact they have probably 4 players regarded in the top 10 historically vs 3 (for the top team), the bottom team has higher iq and more team oriented players (magic and bird) which would let them play as a team a lot better.
I would genuinely like to know how we can open up the country if millions of children aren't even vaccinated. What's the plan for kids and schools? #auspol
"The worst is yet to come, affecting our children's and grandchildren's lives much more than our own" — 4,000-page draft IPCC report on climate impacts is a timely reality check. Can-do optimism, yes. But the science is clear: we're going to take a hit https://t.co/paYNd2Kbxd
@DaAnsahonSports @YesIEatAssBitch @THExCEO@SDinwiddie_25 As discussed in another thread - weak argument - 1960 season record - 5 of 8 teams are under 500
@DaAnsahonSports@RealBillRussell@KingJames I don’t think this is a strong argument. It doesn’t take into account that there is a much larger pool of people that play basketball now then in 1960/70s. You cannot simply conclude that the 100th best player in 1960 must have been better than the 400th best player in 2020