Silicon Valley spent billions engineering apps that remove all friction from our kids' lives. But learning is friction. Critical thinking is friction. We have raised a generation that is completely allergic to cognitive effort. (Prof. Scott Mason)
Elon Musk framed education the way an engineer would.
Musk: “What is education? You’re basically downloading data and algorithms into your brain. And it’s actually amazingly bad in conventional education.”
If education is a download, America is running on dial-up in a fiber optic war.
This isn’t an education problem. It’s a national security failure.
The AI race will not be won by the country with the most compute. Compute can be bought.
It will be won by the country that produces the most people capable of building, directing, and operating alongside the technology.
That is an education output. And America’s output is broken.
The system is optimized for an economy that peaked in 1985.
Students spend twelve years memorizing content they will never apply, inside a structure that hasn’t been redesigned since the industrial era.
Musk: “I think a lot of things people learn, there’s probably no point in learning them, because they never use them in the future.”
Meanwhile, the pipeline that actually matters is either underfunded, understaffed, or missing entirely from most public schools.
AI literacy. Applied math. Engineering. Critical reasoning. The skills that will separate functioning economies from collapsing ones.
The country is spending trillions on education and producing graduates who are trained for jobs the algorithm will do better within five years of their graduation.
That is not an investment. That is a subsidy for obsolescence.
China is restructuring its entire technical education system around AI. Not as an elective. As the foundation.
America is still debating standardized testing.
Musk: “You’ve got someone standing up there kind of lecturing at people, and they’ve done the same lecture 20 years in a row, and they’re not very excited about it. And that lack of enthusiasm is conveyed to the students.”
The format is dead. But the deeper failure is what’s inside the format.
The question isn’t how we teach. It’s whether anything being taught maps to the economy that actually exists right now.
An America First AI strategy doesn’t start with chips or tariffs or data centers.
It starts with the pipeline that feeds them.
Every semiconductor fab. Every AI lab. Every defense application of machine learning. Each one requires a human being who was trained to operate at that level.
If the education system isn’t producing those people, the factories don’t matter. The labs don’t matter. The infrastructure is a monument to nothing.
Post-scarcity economics. Energy independence. The technological edge that underwrites American power globally.
None of it holds without a generation that was actually prepared for the world they’re walking into.
Right now, we are preparing them for a world that no longer exists.
The real America First policy isn’t protectionism.
It’s building the smartest population on Earth. Deliberately. Urgently. Starting now.
The country that upgrades its education pipeline first doesn’t just win the AI race.
It wins everything that comes after.
Meine Meinung: Das Problem mit der europäischen Empörung über Trump ist, dass wir selbst keinen Friedensplan haben. Unsere Hoffnung ist, dass Putin in einem (oder in zwei?) Jahren die Puste ausgeht und er dann um Frieden bettelt. Ja, aber wenn nicht? 1/ https://t.co/EpsHRpDSyh
Der eigentliche Krieg (zumindest für uns im sog. Westen) ist im Bereich der Deutung von Geschehnissen wie dem Gespräch gestern im Oval Office. Und an diesem Krieg haben hauptsächlich China und Kollegen Interesse. Sie sind gerade ziemlich erfolgreich.
Wikipedia cofounder becomes Christian:
The fine-tuning argument
Wikipedia cofounder becomes Christian:
The fine-tuning argument
"Even if we had a perfect scientific explanation of each of these things, the conjunction of the facts in our explanations seems to be driven by a purpose.
If we could not state what these purposes were, then this would seem to be a merely superstitious, biased, religiously-driven claim.
But the purposes are clear: The universal constants permit the existence of spacetime and the coalescence of matter, then stars and planets; certain unlikely chemical facts are absolutely necessary in order for life to exist; certain incredible leaps seem designed to lead life on earth ever onward to greater awareness and knowledge, culminating in man.
If the very emergence of order seems to exhibit ends or purposes or designs, we may hypothesize a designer. Such a designer would not work against or within the order of the universe. That is not the point at all. Rather, such a designer would create the order of the universe."
--Larry Sanger