• Suspension lifted so he can play the first 2 games
• Penalty not given to Colombia
• Colombia robbed of a legal goal
• Penalty to Portugal when they are losing
• Croatia robbed of legit goal
This is going to be the most rigged World Cup ever
Donc le Portugal c’est :
- la FIFA qui annule les 3 matchs de suspension de Ronaldo
- rouge pas donné à Silva
- la VAR qui se trompe sur le hors-jeu de la Colombie
- la VAR qui se trompe sur le hors-jeu de la Croatie
Du jamais vu mais comme c’est pas l’argentine 🤡
🚨ANOTHER SCANDAL:
IF THEY CHECKED IF THE BALL TOUCHED THE CROATIAN PLAYER'S HAIR OR NOT WHY DIDN'T THEY CHECK FOR THIS HANDBALL BY RUBEN DIAS USING THE SAME SENSOR?
FIFA has been rotten for years but never exposed like this time for the Epstein Coalition World Cup. Fitting that a US hosted World Cup would see the less powerful countries being openly cheated like never before, with the complicity of an Israeli Genocide supporting @FIFAcom ...
Only a low IQ non-technical person thinks that a wireless sensor inside a ball with a shitty polling rate that is kicked around for hours is precise enough within low millisecond range to register a string of hair on the ball’s surface, yet magically immune to the pressure wave of someone missing it by 2mm and do all of this over the air in real time across hundreds of meters.
It's an accelerometer. It picks up vibrations and pressure changes from EVERYTHING nearby, even it hitting an insect in the air, then FIFA decides which spike counts as a ‘touch’.
A word about the so-called snicko graph that “proved” croatia striker matanovic touched the ball.
Darren Cann (referee decisions commentator on the BBC and, unfortunately for him, one of the least convincing men ever to see a microphone) said he was “100% certain” there was a touch that caused pasalic to be offside.
He based that certainty on “snicko” technology as this proved the touch.
This is what referee and VAR used to rule out the goal.
But even if you think snicko is a good idea (I don’t) there’s a massive problem with the snicko graph.
IT’S DOESN’T LINE UP WITH THE PICTURES!
Snicko shows one spike and we’re asked to believe that was the matanovic touch.
But there are 4 or 5 touches on the ball in a few seconds (the cross - matanovic? - portugal defender veiga - croatia’s pasalic - then gvardiol scoring).
Snicko shows one?
They have to show a graph where all five touches (if there are five) are represented and where the graph spikes line up perfectly with the footage.
That would remove all doubt.
The way it was presented makes no sense and looks corrupt to the core.