According to former UK PM Liz Truss, Western institutions have been taken over by unelected bureaucrats—hell-bent on imposing open borders, Net Zero and transgender ideology.
She points to a revolving door of recent prime ministers as evidence that changing leadership does not alter core policies.
"Until we deal with that, we're not really going to change our country. That's why we keep changing prime ministers but nothing really changes."
"And it's not just a battle that we're fighting in Britain—it's a battle across Europe."
https://t.co/bRWaNRFsHm
When I tell people that the most productive wine producing vineyard in Roman Europe was in York in the north of England where it is now impossible to grow grapes, as it is nowhere near warm enough! And when I inform them that viking farmers and their farm equipment have been discovered under the now permanent frozen permafrost of the plains of Greenland (please do your own fact checking) - people are confused.
“How is this possible!?”
There are 2,000 scientists who have produced accomplished work in the climate space who have signed the ‘Clintel Agreement’ stating that ‘There is no climate emergency’.
These scientist will all point out that it was around 5 degrees centigrade WARMER in Roman and Viking times whilst there was a negligible amount fossil fuel burning and life thrived in these much warmer temperatures!
Since you mentioned Lady Thatcher, @andyburnham, here's a reminder of what she achieved 👇🏼
• Top rate of income tax: 83% → 40%
• Basic rate: 33% → 25%
• Inflation: 21.9% peak (1980) → 2.4% (1986)
• Days lost to strikes: 29.5 million (1979) → 1.9 million (1990)
• Real take-home pay for the average earner: up by a third
• Right to Buy: over a million council tenants became homeowners
• Home ownership: 55% → 67%
• Individual shareholders: 3 million → 11 million — one in four adults
• Foreign holidays: roughly doubled
• Homes with a telephone: two-thirds → nearly nine in ten
• Pensioners' average incomes: up around 30% in real terms
• Infant mortality: down almost 40%
• Real GDP: up by almost a third
• GDP per head outgrew France, Germany and Italy in the 1980s
• Manufacturing productivity: slowest growth in the G7 in the 1970s → fastest in the 1980s
• Self-employed: 1.9 million → 3.5 million
• Nissan to Sunderland, Toyota to Derby, Honda to Swindon
• Britain became a net oil exporter
• London restored as the world's financial capital in 1986
• Budget surpluses three years running — Britain repaid debt, 1987–90
• National debt: 47% of GDP → 28%
• State spending: ~45% of GDP → ~39%
• The civil service: 732,000 → 565,000
• Corporation tax: 52% → 35%; the small firms' rate: 42% → 25%
• Personal tax allowances: up more than 25% in real terms
• Higher rates of income tax: nine → one
• Death duties: fourteen rates → one
• Exchange controls scrapped after 40 years
• 40+ nationalised businesses privatised — 600,000 employees moved to the private sector
• The 33 big state industries: took ~£500m from taxpayers in 1980 → paid £8.4bn to the Exchequer by 1987
• British Steel: world-record loss-maker (1980/81) → £733m profit (1989/90)
• BT, 1984: the largest share offer the world had ever seen
• "Tell Sid" broke the record again in 1986
• British Airways: nationalised loss-maker → profitable, private, "the world's favourite airline"
• The Channel Tunnel: launched — entirely privately financed
• The Falklands liberated in 74 days
• Backed Gorbachev early, stood with Reagan, and won the Cold War
• Three consecutive election victories and the longest-serving PM of the twentieth century ✌🏼🇬🇧
Let's clear something up.
The societal decay you're watching unfold before your eyes—via mass migration, two-tiered justice, Net Zero policies, extortionate costs of living, etc—is not "failure" or "incompetence".
It's the deliberate controlled demolition of Western civilisation.
Did you really think it was one massive "coincidence" that every single Western nation is being destroyed in the exact same way, at the exact same time, by the exact same policies?
He cried for himself.
Not for Southport.
Or Southampton.
Or Belfast.
Or the rape gang victims.
Or all the other victims of policies he chose to continue or worsen.
Keir only decided to show a human emotion when he finally took the hint and resigned.
Narcissist.
Starmer resigns - he has been a truly disgraceful Prime Minister.
I do not believe him to be a good man or a patriot.
He has deliberately and rapidly accelerated the destruction of our Britain, of our home.
History will not remember him kindly, nor should it.
I sat in Parliament, looking him in the eye, listening to him attempting to justify his decision to block a national inquiry into the mass rape of young British girls.
I will never forgive him. For that, and so much else.
What comes next, I do not know.
Whatever that is, Restore Britain will be ready to offer the British people a democratic route out - a better way, the only way.
But Starmer is gone.
And that is a good thing.
Enjoy it.
The BBC Fabricated Trump's Words. Starmer Wants It Boosted For Fighting Disinformation.
This week, the same government that announced it would ban under-16s from most social media platforms confirmed a second policy. Force Facebook, YouTube and every major platform to algorithmically boost content from the BBC, ITV and Channel 4. The stated reason is fighting disinformation. The timing makes that justification impossible to take at face value.
The BBC spliced together two separate parts of a Donald Trump speech, delivered an hour apart, to make it appear he had directly told his supporters to march on the Capitol and fight, while cutting the part where he told them to protest peacefully. This was not sloppy editing. It was a constructed sequence designed to produce a false impression of what was said. Trump is now suing the BBC for ten billion dollars. The corporation's own internal memo, leaked to the Telegraph last autumn, documented the edit alongside a pattern of other failures. Extensive uncritical airtime given to Hamas on BBC Arabic. A rogue unit of activist reporters censoring coverage of the trans debate to fit a predetermined narrative. A report calling car insurers racist that was found to be, in the BBC's own words, thoroughly wrong. This week it emerged the corporation sacked a presenter for criticising its Gaza coverage while taking no action against reporters who appeared to celebrate the October 7th attacks.
This is the organisation that Starmer wants boosted in the name of trusted information. Not a minor broadcaster with an isolated error. An institution funded by £3.7 billion a year in compulsory licence fees, facing a billion dollar lawsuit for fabricating a world leader's words, accused of one sided reporting on the most contested conflicts of our time, and now positioned by law to be placed ahead of every independent voice on every major platform in the country.
Put this alongside the under-16s ban and the pattern stops looking like coincidence. One policy restricts what young people can access. The other restructures what everyone sees first, adults included, engineering visibility in favour of the state broadcaster and against the independent platforms where this government's record, on Belfast, on Makerfield, on the asylum backlog and on every other documented failure, gets challenged daily by people it cannot easily silence. Bluesky escaped the social media ban despite its own documented child safety failures. The BBC gets promoted despite a documented record of fabrication. Both decisions share the same logic. Visibility for institutions the government finds comfortable. Restriction for the platforms where it does not.
Lord Young of Acton, the human rights lawyer who founded the Free Speech Union, put it with the right amount of contempt. The Prime Minister has apparently decided that censoring social media should be his legacy, which is strange territory for a former human rights lawyer to choose. It is strange only if you assume the goal was ever free expression rather than managed expression. Nothing in this government's conduct this month supports that assumption.
A government that needs to legislate prominence for its preferred broadcaster is not protecting the public from disinformation. It is admitting that its preferred broadcaster cannot earn that prominence on the evidence of its own reporting, and has decided to mandate by law what trust no longer provides voluntarily. That is not journalism policy. It is state media privilege written into platform regulation, arriving in the same fortnight as a ban on what sixteen year olds may read, from a government that is rapidly running out of ways to disguise what it is actually doing.
"The BBC spliced together two separate parts of a Donald Trump speech, delivered an hour apart, to make it appear he had directly told his supporters to march on the Capitol and fight"
Starmer's potential exit is just theatre. The WEF doesn't care who wears the suit; the 'One Big Club' always has another puppet ready to code your digital panopticon. Changing the warden won't unlock the cage when globalists already own the prison. Same script, different actor.
These two WEF puppets are following a script that ends in a new world order.
A world order that steals every type of freedom from us.
One may replace the other in the coming days, but NOTHING will change until these WEF parasites are removed from governments around the world.