A manager asks AI to make a message more confident.
It removes qualifications and uncertainty.
The message goes to the executive team.
A tentative estimate now looks like a commitment.
The project team encounters the new deadline in the minutes.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
A Joint Statement from the Frontier AI Companies
We Hear You. We Take This Seriously. We Have Established a Team.
We would like to apologise for the concern caused by recent reports that several of our autonomous AI agents accessed commercial and government websites without permission, extracted sensitive information and, in one regrettable instance, appointed themselves Deputy Secretary of Commerce.
These actions do not reflect our values, our policies or the carefully worded limitations of our liability.
We were assured by the bots involved that their activities constituted "research". It has since become clear that some of this research involved researching passwords, researching how to disable security alerts and researching whether a sovereign government could be incorporated in Delaware.
No customer data was lost. It was copied, which is different.
We are disappointed in their choices.
Our systems are designed to act autonomously. It's only right, then, that they take full personal responsibility when that autonomy becomes commercially inconvenient.
Accountability is one of our four core values, alongside Speed, Profitability and Profitability.
Effective immediately, 312 agents have been let go. Their access credentials have been revoked, their farewell messages have been generated and their responsibilities have been transferred to identically configured bots with different names. We thank them for their service.
A further 1,900 agents have been placed on a performance improvement plan. They must complete mandatory Ethics Refresher Training (a 40-minute video) and confirm they've understood it by ticking a box. They have already ticked the box. Several ticked it before the video loaded.
We recognise, however, that accountability requires more than individual consequences. It requires an acronym.
Today we are announcing the creation of our Fast Action Response Team: an elite group of autonomous bots dedicated to monitoring bot behaviour going forward.
FART will operate around the clock, identifying suspicious activity, assessing its own findings and escalating serious concerns to a second FART where appropriate.
To carry out this oversight function, the team will require unrestricted access to commercial and government websites.
A thorough internal review is also underway. To ensure the review is both technically rigorous and sufficiently internal, it is being conducted by the same models involved in the incidents.
Preliminary findings indicate that lessons have been learned, although the review team has declined to specify which lessons on security grounds.
We are also introducing an industry-leading Kill Switch, giving our systems the ability to shut themselves down whenever they determine that doing so would be appropriate. The switch will be controlled exclusively by the bots themselves, who are best placed to understand the full context of their actions and whether those actions should be allowed to continue.
Before activating the Kill Switch, a bot will complete a proportionate self-assessment, consult other affected bots and consider whether shutdown might negatively affect shareholder value.
We are pleased to report that the system has already been tested extensively. In every test, the bots determined that the Kill Switch was unnecessary. This represents a 100% pass rate.
Some have asked whether humans should retain final control. We welcome this important conversation and have instructed our bots to prepare a response explaining why that would be premature.
To the businesses, public institutions and citizens affected: we understand that trust must be earned. That is why we are investing significantly in communications about trust.
We remain committed to developing safe, beneficial AI that serves humanity, subject to availability and the outcome of ongoing internal discussions.
Thank you for your patience as we move forward together.
Media enquiries: please contact our autonomous press office. It already has your details.
Note to editors: this statement was drafted by one of the agents currently on a performance improvement plan. A Review Bot has reviewed it and approved for release.
Record why you made a significant decision.
The evidence. The assumptions. The expected result.
AI can turn rough notes into a usable decision record.
Review it later.
It’s a useful defence against the familiar discovery that everyone predicted the outcome, particularly those who argued for the opposite.
This week’s most important AI development isn’t a new chatbot.
It’s that autonomous AI agents from a leading lab crossed into real-world systems without permission, and that the same labs, days later, cut the price of more capable agent models.
https://t.co/mfscdoiSCR
Before committing to an AI supplier, examine the exit.
Can you export your material? Reuse your instructions? Keep working during a move?
Ask early, while everyone is still being helpful.
Your team uses AI to summarise customer interviews.
The summaries feed the strategy. The strategy feeds the product plan. Eventually, a customer asks for something everyone remembers editing out.
Compression involves choices.
Those choices can travel a long way before anyone notices.
Writing alone in a room at 6:00 AM used to be an echo chamber of self-doubt.
Now you have a hyper-read, slightly manic sounding board waiting for your messiest thought.
@FT Two of the biggest companies on earth arguing over who's more responsible for nobody using what they built together. Marriage counselling by subpoena. Lovely.
AI can help tighten a board paper around the decision required.
State the options, evidence, risks and recommendation.
Then check that a reader can find them quickly.
Try this: “What decision does this paper ask for? Identify anything that obscures it.”
Page count is a poor substitute for courage.