This is a very small scale inquiry but I really like it (knowing it is not a perfect study). I like the study's focus on learning Swahili in China https://t.co/74cCOlzHB8
Congratulations to Dr Suzanne Grasso, 2024 Michael Clyne Prize winner for her thesis in immigrant bilingualism and language contact, awarded jointly by ALAA and ALS. Her thesis is titled Multilingual development advice at the Maternal and Child Health Service.
@Duyvvu I just got a rejection because the reviewer disagreed with our interpretation of data ( due to our 'ideological' differences). I thought about writing a complaint to the editor but then I could have done something similar myself, so I swallowed this. It is a brutal world!
Learn about the Shanghai Multilingualism Alliance - who they are and what they do - in this new Language-on-the-Move Podcast episode @NewBooksNetwork
https://t.co/c6enAeLavJ
@JiaqiLiu_soc I think so. Many editors are probably not aware of it but when things come up, they need some guidance and they usually follow the guidance.
@kevinwongLA Well, you can get a better experience if you watch a National Geography documentary on the eclipse. To be honest with you, I just wondered why people were so excited when I was observing one of the very rare eclipses!
@laxmiojha99@AcademicChatter If an editor has limited time (editing is not a full time job), I suppose that the editor will focus on engaging with reviewers more than authors unless the journal does not have enough materials to publish.
@laxmiojha99@AcademicChatter Likely that the editor received mixed reviews. The editor decided to ask for the third opinion. I do this often but I am not sure whether I should reject right away or keep the authors waiting. What editors intend to do something for authors may not be perceived well by authors