@pooltroof@n_brunet_n You just quoted God’s fugitive slave policy. A book with proper procedures for escaped slaves is a book with rules FOR slavery, not against it. Thanks for the assist. 🤡
The pro-life movement is cannibalizing itself in Georgia — the ‘moderates’ who just want to control women aren’t extreme enough for the abolitionists who want to prosecute them. This is what the logic always led to.
Pro-Life organizations are fighting to keep abortion legal. @TXAlliance4Life is petitioning the Texas Republican Party for special murder rights to remain in the party platform and remain in Texas laws.
@pooltroof@n_brunet_n From us. Human rights are a human achievement: argued, fought for, codified into law over centuries. No divine source required. Convenient, since your God’s book endorses slavery and missed human rights entirely for 1,800 years. 🤡
@RevKrytical@ZrimecSteve@SanchezMamacita Not about life, not about persons, it’s about HUMANS --you just discarded every moral and legal category that grants rights and replaced them with caps lock. Skin cells are human.
@ZrimecSteve@rePro_Truth A better question is what drives internalized misogyny. Is it a bargain where women who enforce the rules get rewarded: safety, status, ‘good woman’ standing? The most zealous enforcers often paid the highest price under those rules.
@ZrimecSteve@rePro_Truth 👍Misogyny is an enforcement system, not a male belief set, which is why women can be its most effective enforcers. The system rewards them for it. ‘Mature women take responsibility,’ etc. We both see the receipts here daily.
@pooltroof Lol, you just asked, in public, why women shouldn’t stand trial for murder en masse. Thank you for demonstrating my tweet faster than I could. This is the movement. No mask, no euphemism. Prosecution of women — at scale.
@TC_Indiana@PhrogPollen Consent to sex isn’t consent to pregnancy. ‘The baby had no choice’, well neither do dying kids whose parents can’t be forced to donate a drop of blood. And ‘it’s murder, always will be’ isn’t a logical argument, it’s a tantrum.
@TC_Indiana@AmyElli0ttDunne@PhrogPollen Well 'morally it’s the same’ is not an argument, it’s a dodge. Dependency on care can be transferred to anyone. Dependency on your body cannot. That difference is the entire debate. You just waved it away because you can’t answer it.
@TC_Indiana@PhrogPollen Feeding a child requires care, not your organs. You can hand a dependent to someone else, to the state, to a safe haven, what you can’t be compelled to do is wire your bloodstream to theirs. Jutt’s point stands. Declining bodily use isn’t murder. It never has been.
@JoyceCarolOates "Why do join misogynist churches?" The answer is also the same: you don't choose a system from outside it. You make the best available move from inside one that was designed to limit your options. Asking why women don't just leave is itself the misogynist framing.
@rewegreatyet@On3@Brett_McMurphy@PeteNakos Betting on your own team is the one thing that gets you banned from every sport at every level. Ken Paxton just used the AG's office to threaten a conference into ignoring it. Totally normal.
@ZrimecSteve 🎯 Exactly. The ‘moderates’ offer patriarchy with a smile. The abolitionists offer it with a prosecutor. Same theology, different enforcement mechanism. The mask was always optional.
@demsforlife A half-ounce fetus without cortical consciousness is a medical description, not ‘dehumanizing language.’ Meanwhile women are being prosecuted, dying in ERs, and fleeing states for care. One of these is a dignity crisis. It’s not the accurate sentence.