If you believe free speech is for you but not your political opponents, you're illiberal.
If no contrary evidence could change your beliefs, you're a fundamentalist.
If you believe the state should punish those with contrary views, you're a totalitarian.
If you believe political opponents should be punished with violence or death, you're a terrorist.
Every single military official involved in the treasonous Afghanistan withdrawal must have their resignations on Trump's White House desk by noon on Inauguration Day.
Now this is an example of what I mean, see Donald Trump and Kamala Harris being asked the same question on how they intend to cut down the cost of living for Americans and see how they answer it.
"This election is something of an indictment on the political information complex. The story that was portrayed was not true. We were just ignoring the fundamentals."
Scott Jennings does a flawless job taking down an entire panel of woke CNN hosts.
33 lessons every father must teach his son:
1. Do not gloat in victory.
Everyone already knows you have won. Gloating turns defeated opponents into lifelong enemies. Being gracious in victory creates lifelong friends.
Point out something they did well, and ask how they did it.
If you can't see the difference between terrorists who behead babies, celebrate it, and hide behind their own children to avoid consequence, and soldiers who attempt to avoid civilian casualties, you are not "morally sophisticated." You are a fool, and a dangerous fool at that.
This is a pertinent clip from Sam Harris on the moral difference between Israel and her enemies.
The moral difference comes down to understanding the answer to this question: what would each side do if they had the power to do it?
TRANSCRIPT:
The truth is that there is an obvious, undeniable, and hugely consequential moral difference between Israel and her enemies. The Israelis are surrounded by people who have explicitly genocidal intentions towards them. The charter of Hamas is explicitly genocidal. It looks forward to a time, based on Koranic prophesy, when the earth itself will cry out for Jewish blood, where the trees and the stones will say “O Muslim, there’s a Jew hiding behind me. Come and kill him.” This is a political document. We are talking about a government that was voted into power by a majority of Palestinians.
The discourse in the Muslim world about Jews is utterly shocking. Not only is there widespread Holocaust denial—there’s Holocaust denial that then asserts that we will do it for real if given the chance. The only thing more obnoxious than denying the Holocaust is to say that it should have happened; it didn’t happen, but if we get the chance, we will accomplish it. There are children’s shows in the Palestinian territories and elsewhere that teach five-year-olds about the glories of martyrdom and about the necessity of killing Jews.
And this gets to the heart of the moral difference between Israel and her enemies. And this is something I discussed in The End of Faith. To see this moral difference, you have to ask what each side would do if they had the power to do it.
What would the Jews do to the Palestinians if they could do anything they wanted? Well, we know the answer to that question, because they can do more or less anything they want. The Israeli army could kill everyone in Gaza tomorrow. So what does that mean? Well, it means that, when they drop a bomb on a beach and kill four Palestinian children, as happened last week, this is almost certainly an accident. They’re not targeting children. They could target as many children as they want. Every time a Palestinian child dies, Israel edges ever closer to becoming an international pariah. So the Israelis take great pains not to kill children and other noncombatants.
What do we know of the Palestinians? What would the Palestinians do to the Jews in Israel if the power imbalance were reversed? Well, they have told us what they would do. For some reason, Israel’s critics just don’t want to believe the worst about a group like Hamas, even when it declares the worst of itself. We’ve already had a Holocaust and several other genocides in the 20th century. People are capable of committing genocide. When they tell us they intend to commit genocide, we should listen.
There is every reason to believe that the Palestinians would kill all the Jews in Israel if they could. Would every Palestinian support genocide? Of course not. But vast numbers of them—and of Muslims throughout the world—would. Needless to say, the Palestinians in general, not just Hamas, have a history of targeting innocent noncombatants in the most shocking ways possible. They’ve blown themselves up on buses and in restaurants. They’ve massacred teenagers. They’ve murdered Olympic athletes. They now shoot rockets indiscriminately into civilian areas. And again, the charter of their government in Gaza explicitly tells us that they want to annihilate the Jews—not just in Israel but everywhere.
The fact that 50% of the mothers of such children have borderline personality disorder?
The fact that the explosion of such cases is clearly and unarguably a psychogenic epidemic?
The fact that GID is highly and inextricably comorbid with depression and anxiety?
The fact that perhaps the majority of adult so-called GID cases are autigynephilic males?
How the vaccine rollout went for a lot of people:
Covid isn’t that dangerous for my fitness level and age group. I’m not sure I’m going to take the vaccine.
I think I’ll wait.
No really thanks, I’m going to wait.
The vaccine doesn’t seem to stop transmission. Why do you want me to take it so bad?
People seem to be getting injured from this vaccine. I’m not going to take it.
Ivermectin appears to be an effective treatment for Covid, why are they suppressing it and calling it horse paste?
Why is so much information being censored online, and YouTube creators accounts being terminated?
Why does it seem like only one side of the debate is being heard?
Why won’t my friends let me over to their house because I’m not vaccinated?
Why do friends and family members seem to be distancing themselves from me?
Why won’t you let me eat inside of your restaurant because I didn’t take the vaccine?
Why are you trying to take my career away from me for not taking the vaccine?
Why is California holding a lottery to convince people to take the vaccine?
OK this is getting really weird, why is this being pushed on everyone so hard?
Why is the president saying it’s going to be a long winter of severe illness and death for the unvaccinated?
Why does it seem like so many people who took the vaccine are repeatedly getting covid?
Why is there such a drastic uptick in autoimmune diseases and cancers?
Why are the excess death numbers through the roof?
Congratulations to all of you who survived the largest psychological manipulation campaign ever conducted on humanity. You are stronger than you realize.
Corrupt people tend to make it into the higher echelons of power because the position attracts corrupt people. But also, and this is the tougher pill to swallow, because most people are actually corrupt, and these positions are the embodiment of the inner-tyrant within us all.
George Soros has been so uniquely destructive to law & order in American cities that there’s a name for the carnage he’s wrought: “Soros DAs.” His organization described its strategy to Politico in a 2016 article: it would change the law, not by going through legislatures, but rather by buying under-funded DA elections. His DAs would then change the law through the abuse of prosecutorial discretion.
Soros’ strategy worked because few were paying attention to hyper-local DA elections. No one expected out-of-town money to come in and seek to radically change their quality of life. Now that the results are clear, many more people are paying attention. This has caused some in the mainstream media and leftwing political groups to attempt to portray any criticism of Soros as anti-semitism. This is absurd.
Soros sought to have an outsized impact on public policy. He should not be immune from criticism. In any other context, the influence of money in politics would be a legitimate topic of conversation. Indeed, it is highly appropriate in a democracy to recognize when a special interest has subverted the public interest.
https://t.co/OlElV0srEZ