Qué absoluta desgracia. Qué absoluta tristeza. Y qué mierda es esta vida a veces. No sé ni que decir. Descansa en paz, Gaspi.
Un fuerte abrazo a toda la familia y amigos.
🚨🇵🇪 | MONONEURONALES
En el programa de Curwen, "Todo Good", aseguran que en Perú no existe la izquierda porque Jorge Nieto no se unió con López Chau, Roberto Sánchez y los demás candidatos de izquierda.
El manicomio cada día es más evidente.
🔥PARA VARIAR: DESAHUEVARON A CURWEN NUEVAMENTE🔥
El taradigno de Curwen, el menos cachudo de Twitter, ya está promoviendo la narrativa de que si no votas por el comunista Sánchez es porque eres un racista que le tiene miedo a los "marrones".
Posteriormente Lizandro Bonilla le lanzó una respuesta que no se pueden perder.
¿Esta es la referencia que tienen los jóvenes en política?
There’s a difference between supporting artists and enabling a system that harms them, and right now, Bunnies are being pushed to really face that line.
After losing the contract validity suit, NewJeans going back to ADOR was already hard to accept. For most of us, it wasn’t about trusting the company… it was about the reality that the members didn’t really have better options within the legal situation they were in. The one thing we held onto was that at least the girls would stay together.
But then… ADOR can’t even guarantee that despite their promises in court.
ADOR announcing only two members initially, moving to terminate Danielle’s contract while suing her for damages, and leaving Minji’s situation unclear… those aren’t just random or neutral decisions. It feels calculated. Whether that was the intention or not, the result is obvious: division, confusion, and a lot of pressure being put directly on the members.
And that’s exactly why Bunnies are talking about a boycott.
A boycott isn’t about punishing the girls. It’s about not rewarding a system that looks like it’s willing to undermine them. If we keep streaming, buying, and promoting ADOR’s new releases like nothing’s wrong, what message does that send? That this is fine? That splitting the group, treating members differently, and taking legal action against one of them is okay as long as content keeps coming?
Some people will argue that a boycott could hurt the remaining members, and yeah, that’s the hardest part. No one’s ignoring that. But it’s worth asking: what kind of support actually helps them long-term? Just consuming everything no matter what doesn’t give anyone any real leverage. Staying silent doesn’t set any boundaries. If anything, unconditional support makes it easier for things like this to keep happening.
A unified boycott, though, is different. It draws a line. It says the group should be treated as a whole. That NewJeans is five. That you don’t get to single out members or push them out without consequences. That Bunnies won’t support a version of NewJeans shaped by HYBE and ADOR’s corporate decisions instead of the artists themselves.
This also isn’t about acting like Bunnies know better than lawyers or us trying to control legal outcomes. That’s not our role. But we do have control over what we support, what we promote, and what we normalize.
And right now, it honestly feels like ADOR is testing just how much fans are willing to overlook.
Bunnies have always liked to think we’re more than just passive supporters. This is one of those moments that actually puts that to the test. If we really believe in protecting all five members, not just saying it, but showing it, then a boycott isn’t some extreme reaction. It’s just being consistent.
Because at some point, supporting the artists also means being willing to withhold support and step back from the system that’s putting them in a precarious position.
#FreeNewJeans
#NoDanielleNoNewJeans
#AllDoorsAreClosed