Teachers should be free to speak to protect their pupils from harm without fear of disciplinary action. I was found guilty of misconduct for blowing the whistle
Only a Department for Education civil servant could look at this and say it was "reasonable" for me to be found guilty of misconduct for NOT inviting Hackney Social Services to alter my risk assessment
Do you agree @bphillipsonMP ? @SusanAclandHood ? @Vicky_Salt94 ?
@tombennett71@JoshMacAlister I was the leader of a residential visit to Bowles Outdoor Centre. Tom, a pupil on my list for the visit, had 30 hours of support for his violence. My head and Tom's foster carer didn't declare this on his consent form
I sent @JoshMacAlister a copy of the form to his home
@tombennett71 This wasn't a good appointment @JoshMacAlister has ignored the evidence that my head and a foster carer conspired to leave pupils in danger in an unsupervised dormitory
Josh knows I shouldn't have been found guilty of misconduct for "blowing the whistle" on their negligence
@JoshMacAlister@andyburnham@LucyMPowell Why haven't you already ensured that @educationgovuk civil servants know that pupil safety comes before staff discipline?
For 20 years they have said it was reasonable for me to have been disciplined for blowing the whistle on my head's plan to leave pupils in grave danger
I was found guilty of misconduct because Hackney complained about me sharing information to keep my pupils safe
Hackney's director was Mary Richardson, the disgraced head of Haringey when Victoria Climbie was murdered
Mary had moved to Hackney to avoid disciplinary action
@bphillipsonMP@SusanAclandHood@educationgovuk Ann explained the inequity of @Kent_cc finding me guilty of misconduct for showing Bowles Outdoor Centre my risk assessment
Kent knew I would have been in jeopardy, in the event of an accident to a child, if I hadn't done this
Michael Fallon MP and Adam Holloway MP with the Parent's Petition, in 2006. The DfE said on television that they took it very seriously indeed
The next morning they put it in the bin, the parents were never given a response
@educationgovuk@bphillipsonMP@drlsullivan
The Glenridding Beck Tragedy was 4 weeks before my trip; the leader was jailed for manslaughter for ignoring warnings
@bphillipsonMP my head wanted me to ignore these warnings and leave pupils in danger in an unsupervised dormitory with Tom
I was disciplined because I didn't
@alan_books this petition to YOU was reported on BBC Radio 4's "Today" programme
Did you, or did @educationgovuk civil servants decide to ignore it, and put it in the bin
Sir David Bell was your Permanent Secretary at this time
In 2018, the DfE website said fears about sharing information mustn't stand in the way of the need to protect children
In 2018, Bev Smith told the Schools Minister I was disciplined for sharing the information in my risk assessment, without first discussing it with my head
????
I was found guilty of misconduct because Hackney complained about me sharing information to keep my pupils safe
Hackney's director was Mary Richardson, the disgraced head of Haringey when Victoria Climbie was murdered
Mary had moved to Hackney to avoid disciplinary action
I was disciplined for sharing information to protect my pupils from harm
The 2018 review of my case by @educationgovuk said this was reasonable
@bphillipsonMP the review ignored @Kent_cc's 2002 risk assessment directive & the statutory guidance to information sharing
Dear @NickGibbUK did you, or did your @educationgovuk civil servants decide to ignore this request from my school governors?
They said the disciplinary decision against me was unreasonable & asked you to direct @Kent_cc to overturn it, withdraw the reprimand and issue an apology
In 2018, the DfE website said fears about sharing information mustn't stand in the way of the need to protect children
In 2018, Bev Smith told the Schools Minister I was disciplined for sharing the information in my risk assessment, without first discussing it with my head
????
Only a Department for Education civil servant could look at this and say it was "reasonable" for me to be found guilty of misconduct for NOT inviting Hackney Social Services to alter my risk assessment
Do you agree @bphillipsonMP ? @SusanAclandHood ? @Vicky_Salt94 ?
CATCH-22, I was disciplined for "blowing the whistle" on my head's plan for Tom to stay in an unsupervised dormitory, without his support
If I had done as my head intended & allowed Tom to stay in an unsupervised dormitory, I would still have been liable to disciplinary action:
Kent's PE Advisor said Tom must NOT be resident if he couldn't receive his support at night
My head said Tom MUST be resident, even though he couldn't receive his support at night
@bphillipsonMP I was found guilty of misconduct for following the guidance of Kent's PE Advisor
I was the leader of a residential visit to an activity centre. Tom, a violent pupil on my list for the visit, had an SEN Statement which gave him 30 hrs of support
My head wanted him to share an unsupervised dormitory with other children
Kent's PE Advisor gave me this advice:
I gave this note to my head. She ignored it and continued to insist Tom should stay in an unsupervised dormitory, putting all the pupils in that dormitory at risk
@bphillipsonMP says it was "reasonable" for me to be disciplined for "blowing the whistle" to protect these pupils