@ohyoudidntknw@ScaredyJew@Timcast I've been awake for like 48 hours I'll admit my ability to write coherently is not at its peak but u have still not produced any actual incriminating evidence found in the transcript. Every time I ask you which part is actually incriminating you deflect or call me sweety
@ohyoudidntknw@ScaredyJew@Timcast I mean if he said ya that money I'm withholding, ya get this thing done and I'll give it to you. That would be one thing. But he doesn't say that and doesn't even imply it really
@ohyoudidntknw@ScaredyJew@Timcast Well I certainly wouldn't but that is because if I did then the transcripts of the phone call would be proof. But like me he did not mention it so you got 0 proof. And without proof you can't convict people because without proof you don't know if something is true
@ohyoudidntknw@ScaredyJew@Timcast I read 80 books a year I read 6 books over the last two weeks. U can't point out the incriminating line in a 6 page document because it's not there.
@ohyoudidntknw@ScaredyJew@Timcast He doesn't talk about withholding money at all in the phone call. Sure there are things that might be vague mentions of something but that's not proof
@X_Mr202 @JoeNemesis11 @rpereyaslavsky@bennyjohnson So there is a time limit. Got it. Our of curiosity what is the time limit. Where would you consider the line between valid and invalid in terms of years
@ohyoudidntknw@ScaredyJew@Timcast The big picture stuff you keep referring to. The details about the crime are not even really talked about in the phone call.
@GlenLowrie@bal2nis@princessanna318@bennyjohnson The lib government definitely does not want black people to not think they can succeed. They want them to think they can succeed if they vote for the lib government and that is the only way they can succeed. Of course they don't want them to actually succeed or no votes