Right now, Digital ID is being rolled out in the UK. Not debated openly. Not voted on publicly. Just… normalised.
I’m making an independent documentary called This Is Digital ID to uncover the true motives behind Digital ID, who is pushing it, what interests are shaping it, and how it could fundamentally change freedom, work, and everyday life if it goes unchallenged.
This documentary goes beyond surface explanations. I’m speaking with the public, interviewing politicians, people directly involved in policy and implementation, and political activists to expose what sits beneath the language of “convenience” and “security”.
Despite a serious digital attack that wiped critical files, the project is moving forward. The documentary is scheduled for release later this year on streaming platforms.
There’s no broadcaster. No corporate funding. Just independence.
If you believe people deserve to understand what’s being built around them before it’s too late, please consider donating or sharing.
🔗 Link in the comments.
Everyone's asking me...
"Andy Burnham is becoming PM. Does that mean Digital ID is dead?"
No.
That's the biggest misconception of all.
Digital ID didn't begin with Labour. The consultation started under the Conservatives. Governments change. The agenda doesn't.
That's exactly why I'm making This Is Digital ID.
This isn't about left vs right.
It's about understanding what's being built before it's too late.
The film is now being updated to reflect the latest political developments, but the message hasn't changed.
If you'd like to help get this documentary finished and onto streaming platforms, please consider supporting the project or simply share this post. Every share helps.
The link to my GoFundMe is in the comments section. thank you to all those of you that have contributed already and those intending on doing so now.
@AlObhin30688@DFurneaux MMS and streaming platforms have hardly touched the subject at all. The majority of everyday people are unaware of the dangers that Digital ID poses
They told us Digital ID would be about “convenience” and “security”.
No one mentioned it could quietly become the operating system of your life!
In the UK, GOV . UK One Login and other schemes are building the infrastructure to link your identity to public services, finance, travel and more.
In the US and across the West, governments and corporations are racing to do the same.
Once your ID, your money and your movement are all digital, they can also be made conditional.
Access can be tracked, limited… or switched off.
My new documentary, “This Is Digital ID”, asks the questions almost no one in mainstream media is asking:
•Who is really driving Digital ID?
•How far will it reach into everyday life?
•What happens when saying “no” is no longer an option?
We’ve already faced serious setbacks getting this film made, and we have no corporate backers. That’s by design. If this story is going to be told honestly, it has to be funded by people who care about freedom, not by the systems we’re investigating.
If you think people deserve to understand what’s being built around them before it’s too late to push back, I’d really value your support.
Watch the video
Share it with someone who shrugs off Digital ID as “just another app”
If you want to help us finish the film, the support link is in the comments.
Independence matters.
Let’s get this finished and make sure the Digital ID conversation happens in public, while we still have a choice.
Yesterday, while most people were focused elsewhere, Parliament moved forward with legislation that could lay the foundations for a digital identity system for children in Britain.
It’s being presented as safeguarding and wellbeing.
But behind the language are proposals for a Single Unique Identifier — one number linking records across education, health, social care and beyond.
No national debate.
No clear public mandate.
Almost no media scrutiny.
This is exactly why I’m making my documentary This Is Digital ID.
Not fear. Not conspiracy. Just facts, research, evidence, and the questions nobody seems willing to ask.
If you believe the public deserves transparency before systems like this become normalised, please watch, share, and support the film.
Contribute to the film with the link in the comments.
Thank You
@elonmusk At what cost to our individual freedoms though? Is there a government in the world you trust to hand out money to its people without caveats?
POV: you said “I’ll just film something quickly”
vs
You actually invest in your content
Same person…
but one of them looks like they charge more.
Be honest… which one are you picking?
If you thought digital ID had quietly disappeared… you’ve been misled. It hasn’t gone away. It’s accelerating.What we’re witnessing right now isn’t just a policy shift - it’s a fundamental change in how freedom could operate in the future. A system where access to movement, finance, and even speech could become permission-based rather than a given.This documentary - This Is Digital ID - is about exposing what’s really happening beneath the surface:
• How it started
• How it’s being sold to you
• And what it could mean for your futureBecause there is a version of this future that looks a lot like 1984 except this time, it’s not fiction.I’ve already got a distributor lined up.
But to finish this properly, I need to take it global - including filming in the US and speaking to key figures shaping this conversation. To make that happen, I need to raise £15,000.If you can contribute, the GoFundMe link is in this post.
If you can’t, you can still make a huge impact:Like this post.
Comment your thoughts.
Share it with people who need to see this.This isn’t about me.
It’s about making sure people are informed before it’s too late to question it.
Link to Go Fund Me in the comments.
They were global pop icons. They topped charts around the world. And decades later, they’re still refusing to stay silent.
Here’s a glimpse into my conversation with Right Said Fred @TheFreds.
This conversation was an absolute pleasure for me, with a glimpse into the music industry of the 90's to modern day politics and plenty of laughs along the way.
Richard & Fred, thank you so much for your time and the conversation.
The full interview will be available later today.
I sat down with investigative journalist Jacqui Deevoy @JacquiDeevoy1 specifically to give space to a subject that is rarely discussed openly - what happened inside UK care homes and hospitals during Covid, and why so many families are still searching for answers.
From the outset, it was clear this wouldn’t be a light or comfortable discussion.
What followed was a long, in-person conversation covering blanket Do Not Resuscitate orders, NICE Guideline 163, the use of midazolam and morphine, the withdrawal of food, fluids, and essential medication, Operation Talla, and the silence that surrounded these issues while they were happening.
This isn’t a fast-cut interview designed for headlines or outrage.
It’s a slow, careful conversation that allows difficult subjects to be explored properly and without interruption.
Some of what is discussed will make people uncomfortable. Some of it will be disputed. But the questions being raised are legitimate, and they deserve to be heard.
Whether you agree with every conclusion or not, this is a conversation that shouldn’t be buried. Too many of these topics were never allowed to be examined in the open, and that alone should concern people.
The full conversation is now live on YouTube.
If this interview resonates with you, don’t just watch it. Share it. Let others hear it and make up their own minds.
Conversations like this don’t stay visible by accident, they stay visible because people actively keep them alive.
Link to the Video is in the comments.
This interview with @ABridgen was initially filmed for a segment of my upcoming documentary on digital ID. However, we ended up covering a much broader range of topics. So far, I’ve only been sharing clips, but I’m now considering releasing the entire interview. However, since this interview was filmed as part of the documentary, it’s not exactly in an interview format. Would you be interested in watching the entire conversation? If so, where would you prefer to see it—here on my website or on YouTube?
Just watched this clip from Channel 4 and I’m interested to hear where people land on it.
The interview is with Anders Fogh Rasmussen, speaking from Davos, responding to questions about Donald Trump and his recent comments regarding Greenland.
Rasmussen frames the issue as a serious threat to NATO and the existing world order, which is a strong claim in itself. But it made me wonder whether we fully understand why Greenland is such a sensitive issue in the first place.
From a military and strategic perspective, Greenland occupies a critical position in the Arctic. It plays a role in early warning systems, missile defence, surveillance, and the wider balance of power when it comes to pressure from Russia and China. This isn’t about ownership as much as capability and responsibility.
So my question is this, and I’m genuinely asking rather than arguing a position.
If the United States were not heavily involved in Greenland, does Europe on its own currently have the military capability, infrastructure, intelligence reach, and logistical capacity to utilise Greenland effectively from a defensive standpoint? Or has Europe become structurally dependent on US military power in ways that are uncomfortable to acknowledge?
This isn’t about supporting or opposing Trump.
It’s not about personalities.
It’s about geopolitics, military reality, and how defence actually works in practice.
I’m interested in hearing informed, good faith opinions on this from all sides.
What do people think?
#Greenland #NATO #Geopolitics #ArcticSecurity #GlobalPolitics #Davos #Davos26
🚨Warning🚨 - Some parts of this conversation are difficult to hear.
I wasn’t originally going to release this interview in full.
This was filmed as part of my upcoming documentary on digital ID. That was the brief. That was the intention. But once I sat down with Andrew Bridgen, it became clear very quickly that this conversation went far beyond what either of us expected.
What came out was raw, unfiltered, and explosive.
Covid. Vaccine harms. Excess deaths. Political pressure. Public inquiries. Big Pharma. Digital ID. Agenda 2030. Freedom of speech. Media control. Child trafficking. Power structures. Corruption. And the personal cost of speaking out.
Because this was filmed for a documentary, not a standard sit-down interview, I want to be upfront. It’s a single camera angle throughout. I wasn’t mic’d up, so my audio is a little lower than Andrew’s in places. Nothing is polished. Nothing is sanitised. Nothing is cut to make it comfortable.
But that’s also why it matters.
Due to the sheer volume of messages asking for the full conversation, I’m releasing it in its entirety. Exactly as it happened. No edits to soften it. No clips taken out of context.
Whether you agree with everything said or not, this is a conversation that should not be buried. Too much of what Andrew talks about is never allowed to be discussed openly, and that alone should concern people.
If this interview resonates with you, don’t just watch it. Share it. Get it out there. Let others hear it and make up their own minds.
Let’s get millions of eyes on this.
Because conversations like this don’t surface by accident, and they don’t stay available unless people actively keep them alive.
Full interview now live.
This video is also available on Youtube at the link in the comments. This has not be uploaded to the usual Anomalous Media Youtube page as quite frankly it will probably get banned.
If you appreciate this work please consider donating to the production cost of my up coming documentary "This Is Digital ID" GoFundMe link in comments.
At Anomalous Media we are not afraid to have the conversation that’s others won’t touch. We believe it the truth no matter how uncomfortable it is to hear.
Get involved, work with us or share our content at https://t.co/DeSlI8msBy
🚨Warning🚨 - Some parts of this conversation are difficult to hear.
I wasn’t originally going to release this interview in full.
This was filmed as part of my upcoming documentary on digital ID. That was the brief. That was the intention. But once I sat down with Andrew Bridgen, it became clear very quickly that this conversation went far beyond what either of us expected.
What came out was raw, unfiltered, and explosive.
Covid. Vaccine harms. Excess deaths. Political pressure. Public inquiries. Big Pharma. Digital ID. Agenda 2030. Freedom of speech. Media control. Child trafficking. Power structures. Corruption. And the personal cost of speaking out.
Because this was filmed for a documentary, not a standard sit-down interview, I want to be upfront. It’s a single camera angle throughout. I wasn’t mic’d up, so my audio is a little lower than Andrew’s in places. Nothing is polished. Nothing is sanitised. Nothing is cut to make it comfortable.
But that’s also why it matters.
Due to the sheer volume of messages asking for the full conversation, I’m releasing it in its entirety. Exactly as it happened. No edits to soften it. No clips taken out of context.
Whether you agree with everything said or not, this is a conversation that should not be buried. Too much of what Andrew talks about is never allowed to be discussed openly, and that alone should concern people.
If this interview resonates with you, don’t just watch it. Share it. Get it out there. Let others hear it and make up their own minds.
Let’s get millions of eyes on this.
Because conversations like this don’t surface by accident, and they don’t stay available unless people actively keep them alive.
Full interview now live.
This video is also available on Youtube at the link in the comments. This has not be uploaded to the usual Anomalous Media Youtube page as quite frankly it will probably get banned.
If you appreciate this work please consider donating to the production cost of my up coming documentary "This Is Digital ID" GoFundMe link in comments.
For those of you that don't know, I hosted a UFO podcast for three years with my co-host Tom Thompson (@Cortex_Zero) , speaking to whistleblowers, scientists and intelligence insiders, mostly in the US, when this subject was still very much on the fringes.
With a recent UK article discussing the Bank of England and the potential implications of disclosure, I’ll be posting a full video tomorrow sharing my thoughts on how the conversation has shifted and where we are now.
Is it time for you to start taking this subject seriously?