Anony_

♧Biochemist
♧Crypto Guru
♧Shiller
♧Raider
♧Community Manager

[Anony_ @anonymist2d]

#NewProfilePic
Let's go 🚀

[Anony_ @anonymist2d]

@Driplord_001 @rollxfi Big wallet doesn’t automatically mean good delegate

[Anony_ @anonymist2d]

@Defi_lawd @rollxfi The hard part is finding someone whose views actually match yours

[Enoch🥷 @Defi_lawd]

GM CT

One thing that could make DAO governance easier is delegation.

Not everyone has time to follow every proposal, read every discussion and vote every week. That doesn’t mean they shouldn’t have a voice.

Delegating to someone who understands your views could be a good middle ground.

Would you rather vote on everything yourself or delegate your voting power?

[Anony_ @anonymist2d]

@Driplord_001 @rollxfi I’d track whether the original goal was actually achieved

[Driplord @Driplord_001]

G Morning CT

Something I’ve been thinking about with @rollxfi governance: participation shouldn’t end after you cast your vote. The interesting part is what happens after the decision.

[Enoch🥷 @Defi_lawd]

GM CT

Not every community proposal is going to pass.

But I think a rejected idea can still be useful if the community understands why it didn’t make the cut.

Was the timing wrong?
Was the impact too small?
Was there a better alternative?

That feedback can make the next proposal much stronger.

How should @RollX handle good ideas that don’t pass the first time?

[Anony_ @anonymist2d]

@Defi_lawd Disagreement is actually healthy for governance imo

[Anony_ @anonymist2d]

@Driplord_001 @rollxfi Sometimes the best ideas come from people actually using the product every day

[Anony_ @anonymist2d]

@Defi_lawd @rollxfi Community demand is important, but popularity alone shouldn’t decide

[Driplord @Driplord_001]

Gm 𝕏

Been thinking about @rollxfi proposals and what should actually make one stand out. A good idea shouldn’t win just because it gets the most attention. The problem it solves and the value it brings should matter too.

[Enoch🥷 @Defi_lawd]

GM @rollxfi ☀️

One thing I think could make RollX governance more useful is having a clear way to decide which community ideas deserve attention first.

Not every suggestion can become a proposal, and not every proposal can be worked on immediately.

So what should matter most?

How many people want it?
How much it improves the trading experience?
How easy it is to actually build?
Or how much long-term value it could bring to RollX?

I’d probably want a mix of all four.

The interesting part is figuring out what the community thinks should carry the most weight.

If you could set one priority rule for @rollxfi proposals, what would it be?

[Anony_ @anonymist2d]

@Driplord_001 @rollxfi This is how community participation should work

[Anony_ @anonymist2d]

@Defi_lawd @rollxfi Risk should definitely be part of every proposal.

[Anony_ @anonymist2d]

@Driplord_001 @rollxfi Honestly, seeing an idea get tested would motivate me more than just voting

[Anony_ @anonymist2d]

@Defi_lawd @rollxfi Active traders should definitely have a way to contribute.

[Driplord @Driplord_001]

Been thinking about what makes someone actually participate in DAO governance.

It’s not just having voting power. People are more likely to contribute when they can see that their ideas are taken seriously, discussed openly and have a chance of turning into something real

[Driplord @Driplord_001]

GM @rollxfi

Who actually gets heard in DAO governance?

Token holders bring skin in the game, but active traders and contributors see things others might miss.

So what should carry more weight in RollX governance?

Tokens, contribution, or a mix of both?

[Anony_ @anonymist2d]

@Defi_lawd A setup isn’t supposed to survive just because you called it first

[Anony_ @anonymist2d]

@Defi_lawd @rollxfi Risk and expected impact should definitely be clear before voting imo.

[Anony_ @anonymist2d]

@Defi_lawd @rollxfi More users and liquidity sounds great, but community control has to scale with it too.