Truth is generally the best vindication against slander - Abraham Lincoln
----
Bright stars in young eyes,
hungry hearts chasing wonders—
silenced by the years.
People who shun new innovations get left in the dust as the world races ahead. Einstein: "No nuclear energy ever." Kelvin: "Flying machines impossible." Ken Olson: "No one needs a home computer." Preece: "We have messenger boys." History's naysayers prove it. Adapt or fade. 🚀
Comments like this only support that many of the left suffer from mental disorders. They are so depressed they aren't even grateful for the life they have.
@Nocsm1@helium_mobile@AndrewYang@joinnoblemobile@helium No I wanted a decentralized mobile solution and selling to someone who has no idea what they are doing was the wrong move. I didn't want a way out because I could switch whenever... I wasn't a slave to Helium Mobile 😂
The damage that the charlatan @BarackObama has done to the United States is incalculable. He is swimming in an infinity pool of malignant narcissism. A true scammer filled with destructive ideological anti-American zeal.
@Notemple4ujew@MikhailaFuller Anything in quotes would be a copy and paste along with links. Again you aren't omniscient. Please seek help in understanding the Bible.
I'm not Catholic 😂 and neither is she. I didn't lie about anything here. You have contradicted yourself and spun in repetitive circles. You've ignored physical resources from your church. You have openly lied about Aquinas. I recommend taking guidance from someone at your church.
Your own screenshot actually confirms the distinction between "natural" and "sacramental" marriages, but continuing to explain it feels like a waste when you’ve chosen to ignore the facts rather than show the humility to learn. You are trying to apply a level of indissolubility to an agnostic, pre-conversion union that not even the Vatican requires under Canon 1143 (The Pauline Privilege).
Ultimately, it seems you just don't want to see what is right in front of you or do the work to understand these theological categories. You are choosing to treat a believer’s life as a legal document to be audited rather than a soul justified by the Gospel. By insisting she is "unrepentant," you are essentially arguing that Christ’s blood is too weak to wash away a pre-Christian past.
I truly hope that in the future, you are able to study the Word for what it actually is—a message of redemption and new creation—rather than a weapon for legalism. One of us is standing on the finished work of the Cross; the other is standing on a stack of paperwork. I’ll stick with the Cross.