I am sharing these screenshots respectfully because I believe accusations this serious should be based on specific evidence.
If @JGC1_ believes that @LISANATIONS_ copied their work, please identify the specific lines of code, unique implementation, assets, or other material that were allegedly taken.
We are more than willing to compare the actual source objectively.
Similarity is not the same as proof of copying.
JGC "the site is static, showing that the site was copied from another live source"
The same applies to the claim that LISANATIONS is “static.”
A website being static does not prove that it was copied from another website.
Static HTML/CSS is a normal way to build and deploy websites.
To establish source-code plagiarism, there should be identifiable evidence of copied code, not simply the fact that two websites share common web-design patterns.
I have never denied that ChatGPT was used as one of the tools involved in building LISANATIONS.
But using AI does not prove that someone copied another website's source code.
An AI-generated or AI-assisted website is not automatically based on JGC, and AI involvement alone cannot establish who the supposed “source” was.
@JGC1_ "You admitted using ChatGPT, so you proved our claim."
NO. @LISANATIONS_ admitted using ChatGPT. That doesn't prove copied JGC.
The hero implementations are also different.
JGC's source contains a carousel architecture with elements such as:
hero-carousel
hero-track
hero-slide
hero-media
hero-scrim
hero-arrow
hero-progress
LISANATIONS uses a different structure for its hero section.
Similar concepts such as having a “hero” section are normal in web development and do not establish that one site's source code was copied from another.
Now, looking at LISANATIONS' actual source:
lisanation main CSS is structured differently and is included directly in the HTML rather than using the same stylesheet structure shown above.
The variables are also different, for example:
--bg: #050505
--panel: #0c0708
--panel2: #13090b
--red: #e40025
--red2: #9e1020
I also looked directly at JGC's stylesheet.
Its CSS uses its own variables and component system, including things such as:
--bg-elevated, --surface, --primary, --text, --font-display, --font-script, etc.
The stylesheet also contains JGC-specific components and layouts.
JGC's publicly accessible source shows a separate stylesheet (s.css) and a number of JavaScript files, including -main.js
-home.js
-auth.js
-playlists.js
-spotify-data.js
-youtube-data.js and others.
This confirms that JGC has its own project structure.
But having its own project structure does not, by itself, demonstrate that LISANATIONS copied it.
A respectful clarification regarding the recent claims about LISANATIONS website.
JGC has publicly claimed that LSN website copied their HTML/source code and that the HTML of both websites is “exactly the same.”
Since this is a serious accusation, I would like to address it with the actual source code rather than assumptions or appearances.
What evidence shows that @LISANATIONS_ copied @JGC1_ source code?
So I checked the actual HTML and CSS of both websites.
"NGAPAIN SI PADA DEMO?"
Sesimpel:
BIAR LO MINUM KOPI HARGA 25RB TETEP BAYAR 25RB
BIAR LO BELI BENSIN GA MAHAL
BIAR GAJI LO UTUH GADA POTONGAN
BIAR LO KERJA GA CUMA BUAT NUTUPIN KEBUTUHAN POKOK LO.
JADI MEREKA YANG DEMO IMPACTNYA BUAT LO JUGA YANG PADA NYINYIRIN ORANG DEMO!!!
🇮🇩 𝗣𝗥𝗔𝗬 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗜𝗡𝗗𝗢𝗡𝗘𝗦𝗜𝗔 🇮🇩
Carat INA, mari sejenak kita menundukkan kepala, menyatukan tangan, dan berdoa untuk saudara-saudara kita di NTT, KALIMANTAN, ACEH, PAPUA, dan berbagai daerah di Indonesia yang sedang mengalami musibah bencana alam 🖤
Indonesia sedang tidak baik-baik saja🥀
#PRAYFORKALIMANTAN
#PRAYFORNTT
#PRAYFORACEH
#PRAYFORPAPUA
#PRAYFORINDONESIA
#AllEyesOnIndonesia
Mari satukan suara dan doa untuk Indonesia. Semoga Indonesia selalu dalam lindungan-Nya. 🤍🕊️🇮🇩