I love this tracker. A lot seems AI gen/sourced, but if this gets popular, with crowd-sourced corrections, this can be a viable and visible 🇮🇳/acc tracker
The map of what India can't yet build, and who's building it, is filling in fast.
Where it stands:
-5,100+ capabilities tracked
-450+ fully researched pages
1,580+ builders
-across 18 sectors.
This week alone: 180 new pages, 640+ builders, 70+ reader-flagged gaps.
A slice of the hard ones that went up this week:
• Harmonic drives (strain-wave gears)
• Silicon photonics & co-packaged optics
• Gallium production
• Industrial-grade MCUs for robotics & drones
• Real-time industrial fieldbus (EtherCAT/PROFINET)
• Aircraft-carrier arresting gear
• Next-generation marine propulsion
• Warp knitting machines
• Onboard perception for autonomous machines
• AI-driven small-molecule & peptide drug discovery
And a few of the builders climbing them:
Ati Motors · Minus Zero · https://t.co/HZJzuzGz26 · Cron AI · Boltzmann · Sensa Core - alongside hundreds more, from LMW to Hetero Drugs.
See a gap we're missing? Name it → https://t.co/ayUnuJ58gw
Switch from Claude Code to the Claude app's code mode. Seriously.
Everything's scriptable in the CLI, I know, I did it that way.
But plans, subagents, repos, and remote sessions being visible made me faster. It is mature enough now to switch.
@muskanvaswan yeah honestly that's half my point. the overlap is real and growing. the only real line today is whether the agent loop is the product or a feature. once everything's agentic that distinction disappears and we're just SDEs again.
@paraschopra my gym coach is a cron job that reads my logs every night and writes tomorrow's plan. every morning i get a fresh web UI with new weights, new notes, new targets. no chat, but the same Ui is used for logging. built on openclaw, weirdly the most self-improving software i own.
As someone building in LLM orchestration, I rarely pay for AI subs. But @NotionHQ is exceptional. It persists chats into readable files for seamless memory management, far better UI than Claude/ChatGPT. Plus, Opus, Gemini & GPT under one seemingly unmetered sub!
Thinking honestly might just be letting your ideas die in your imagination, so you don't have to watch them die in real life.
I'd rather be throwing punches at my own ideas than be the one who just says yes.
Full essay: https://t.co/hVQ8JAOMWq
I wrote an essay about something that's been bothering me for months.
When I work on architecture now, I don't think from the first row. I give the AI context, ask for options, it recommends one. Most of the time it's right.
So I just say yes.
🧵 from "I Just Say Yes"
Two corrections:
It can't run on willpower, the fight has to be built into the environment.
And I can't reward just finding flaws (that's performative self-criticism). The reward is for the flaw that forces a genuine change.
unfortunately real work (food, shelter, hvac, medical) has been solved for quite a while based on % of population has to keep providing them for the rest. but we keep inventing new tangents of work purely for status games so we can find consensus on who gets the best scarcities
the more real work is automated (construction, transportation etc) the more we'll see a pivot to pure status games. people will keep having to work 8 hour days just to have enough cash and clout to avoid getting evicted by gentrification. cities are the ultimate scarcity
As you become an adult, you realize that things around you weren't just always there; people made them happen. But only recently have I started to internalize how much tenacity *everything* requires. That hotel, that park, that railway. The world is a museum of passion projects.