For over two years, we told you: Hamas used hospitals for military purposes. The dead “journalists” were combatants. Hamas used child soldiers. That aid was being diverted by Hamas. Tens of thousands of the dead and wounded in Gaza were combatants. Hamas used human shields.
And so many other things, all of which are now proven as incontrovertibly true.
Yet, not a whisper to set the story straight from the global media who pushed the genocide and war crimes lies since 7th October.
« Depuis le 7 octobre, je me revendique comme juif et sioniste, que les choses soient extrêmement claires, et j’emmerde LFI. C’est le premier parti antisémite de France. Il faut qu’ils assument leur position. »
Un véritable Juste.
Merci @quatremer
Watching various French players just smile and laugh at Paraguayan attempts at provoking them today was, weidly, one of my highlights of the tournament. Admirable grace, poise and emotional competence.
Britain has managed a piece of foreign-policy incoherence so neat it almost deserves study. In September 2025, the UK formally recognised the State of Palestine as part of its declared commitment to a two-state solution. At a time when the UK is facing a £15 billion black hole in Defence funding, the government has now announced another £23 million for UNRWA, the separate UN agency built around the category of “Palestine refugees”, which includes millions across the region and civilians in Gaza.
If Palestine is a state, why are Palestinians still administered by a permanent refugee agency rather than by the institutions of the state Britain says it recognises?
UNRWA is more than a relief mechanism. It preserves a political architecture in which refugee status is passed down the generations, with descendants of Palestine refugee males eligible for registration. That is the core absurdity: the refugee question has not been treated as a problem to be resolved through statehood, compensation, resettlement, or a final-status compromise. It has been kept alive solely as a permanent claim against Israel.
The “right of return”, when understood as mass return to Israel rather than to a future Palestinian state, is a demographic veto on Israel’s continued existence as a Jewish state. No two-state settlement can survive that demand. You cannot simultaneously claim to support two states and continue to subsidise the institutional machinery of a maximalist refugee claim that points back into one of them.
Then there is UNRWA’s record. UN Watch has documented hundreds of UNRWA employees connected to terrorism, including 12% of UNRWA’s Gaza staff who are members of Hamas or other designated terrorist organisations. In any other theatre, an agency under that kind of cloud would not be treated as the default, indispensable vehicle for British aid.
None of this requires indifference to the suffering of civilians in Gaza. Food, medicine, shelter, and clean water should reach civilians. The question is why British policy keeps choosing a channel that entrenches hereditary refugeehood, sustains the fantasy of return to Haifa and Jaffa, and has repeatedly been compromised by the very forces that made Gaza ungovernable.
Recognition of Palestine should have meant a move towards normal statehood: institutions, accountability, borders, and responsibility. Instead, Britain is funding the maintenance of exceptionalism while telling itself it is buying peace. The result is incoherent, sentimental, and shameful.
This is the UN.
Look at the face of the UN special rapporteur who is meant to stand up for women but has refused, again and again, to speak up for Israeli women.
Look at her face when a former hostage challenges her.
“We revealed 13 patterns of abuse — including rape, gang rape, sexual torture, and the deliberate mutilation of victims’ faces and genitalia.
Victims were filmed while being tortured.
Families were forced to see the suffering of their loved ones.
Where is your compassion?
Will the UN rapporteurs who doubted or denied these crimes acknowledge the truth?
Israeli victims were not merely abandoned. They were singled out, dehumanized, delegitimized.”
Dr. @CochavElkayam founder and chair of the Civil Commission on October 7 Crimes by Hamas Against Women and Children, challenges the U.N. over its failure to stand with Israeli victims.
Françoise Gomez, l’adjointe de la Scala qui a largement contribué à la maltraitance des élèves juifs venus jouer une pièce. Sabrer leur pièce, rester de marbre quand les autres appelaient à leur génocide avant de les encourager à partir. Une vraie fonctionnaire vichyssoise
Iran has just been nominated to preside over the UN Committee for the protection of women's rights, human rights, and the prevention of terrorism.
YES, IRAN. And it was supported by the United Kingdom, Spain, and France.
This is not a joke. It's real.
- @isaacrrr7
Haviv (@havivrettiggur) is exactly right.
The so-called “pro-Palestine” movement isn’t seriously interested in ending the conflict. They’re too addicted to their own moral outrage and performative slogans to do the hard work of actually thinking about how this ends.
If they truly wanted peace, they would change their messaging, drop the eliminationist rhetoric, speak directly to Israelis, and address Israel’s rational security concerns — forged by decades of rejectionism and repeated attempts to annihilate the Jewish state.
They don’t.
Because that’s not what this is about.
"Free Palestine" isn't pro-Palestinian.
It's anti-Israel venom.
What kind of government rushes through executions of protesters from the previous uprising in 2022 in the middle of a war in 2026? Shame on the “progressive left” for being useful idiots to the most extreme far right fascism there is on the planet in the name of “anti imperialist resistance”. Absolutely disgraceful.
https://t.co/NyyQEPdwjs
12 million Germans were expelled after WWII. Up to 2 million died.
There is no German right of return, no inherited refugee status, no movement built on this.
700,000 Arabs were displaced in 1948. Four generations later it’s a fake “refugee” population of 6 million.
The difference isn’t scale. Germany’s expulsion was an order of magnitude bigger and far deadlier. The difference is that Germany’s neighbors integrated the expellees and postwar Germany refused to weaponize the grievance — because the war was Germany’s fault.
Israel absorbed 850,000 Jews expelled from Arab lands: absorbed in a generation, gone as a political claim.
The Arab world did the opposite. UNRWA exists to make the wound permanent and heritable, the only refugee status on earth that is.
Palestinian refugee status didn’t survive because 1948 was uniquely terrible. Only max 15,000 Arabs died in Israel’s War of Independence. A war the Arab states started. For comparison, 200k-2M died during partition of India and Pakistan. No tears for them.
Palestinian refugees “survived” because the losers decided their status should never end.
The Mayor believes identity is whatever you want it to be. If you identify as a refugee you are. Almost everyone on earth can trace their ancestry back to a forced migration. Most find a way to move forward. But “no Jews, no Jews.”
Il y a quelques jours est sorti le film "L’Abandon", consacré au sort tragique de Samuel Paty.
Je ne sais pas bien comment le dire, car dans ce genre de situation, nous autres enseignants sommes souvent contraints au silence. Pourtant, je me sens obligé de parler. Même si c’est risqué.
Il y a quelques mois, à l’entrée du site où j’enseigne, dans le 5e arrondissement, j’ai découvert des tags : « Mort à Hanouna », « Mort aux Sionistes », « Free Gaza ». La routine, hélas.
Ce jour-là, mon cours portait sur l’écologie appliquée. En entrant en classe, j’ai quand même osé faire une petite introduction. J’ai expliqué que ces slogans mettaient notre école en danger et qu’il valait mieux éviter des propos aussi extrêmes. J’imaginais un consensus rapide, avant de passer au véritable sujet du cours : la mémoire et la résilience des écosystèmes.
À ma grande surprise, une partie des étudiants m’a ouvertement contesté. Certains ont affirmé que « les Juifs avaient mérité leur sort », que Hanouna était d’extrême droite et que les musulmans étaient les véritables victimes, persécutées « par le système ». Je suis resté sans voix, déboussolé.
Je leur ai rappelé qu’il s’agissait de menaces de mort. Plusieurs ont préféré quitter le cours plutôt que d’engager le débat.
Je suis perdu face à cette nouvelle génération.
Quelques jours plus tard, j’ai compris que ma hiérarchie ne me soutenait pas vraiment. Des étudiants « susceptibles » s’étaient plaints de ce que j’avais osé dire. On me l’a fait savoir, on me l’a reproché.
C’est perturbant.
Bien sûr, dans le cadre d’un cours scientifique, j’aurais sans doute dû me taire, baisser la tête et faire comme si je n’avais rien vu en entrant dans l’établissement.
Pourtant, quelque chose en moi me dit que non.
Et le sort de Samuel Paty me parle.
Comment oser se taire ?
Oh, and the timing for Kristof's propaganda piece was to get ahead of this.
He wasn't tasked with revealing sexual crimes, but with covering for them. And it worked.
https://t.co/w5ymheQQ84