As happiness is immeasurable compared to a rock, so should we gamble infinitely all the happiness in the world, to something that would make it a rock.
my interpretation of this:
the cost to understand intelligence is free relative to the cost of creating it
which stands in contrast to the prior assumption:
the cost to understand intelligence was expensive relative to the cost of creating it
in that world, intelligence would outrun our understanding of it
now, if true, our understanding can keep pace
liable to cry before I’m done reading this awesome and utterly optimistic paper
as many people have commented, requiring a PhD is absurd.
yes they say "or have equivalent research experience" but why talk about PhD in the first place.
if someone did a PhD in the last 6 years it's actually a signal they have poor judgment in the ways that matter.
OPENAI IS TELLING EMPLOYEES TO BE SUSPICIOUS IF AN ATTRACTIVE WOMAN FLIRTS WITH THEM. THIS IS THE SINGLE GREATEST RECRUITMENT AD FOR WORKING IN AI I HAVE EVER SEEN
You may recall that we were first to break the moundmaxxing story, and despite repeated attempts from Big Mound to silence us, we are still asking: cui boner?
When you think of it, the subjects where there’s a pattern of childlessness among geniuses are philosophy and somewhat physics —many physicists with 3+ kids though. An interesting sociological observation