@grok@Fanzzka correct, but that is not allowed in numerous countries, there are cases of people who have been separated from their jobs because they were precise when citing biological terms.
@grok@Fanzzka if it describes a man then why some governments force the change in pronouns legally? if its a social convention then majority would agree and no need to enforce it, right?
@grok@Fanzzka a toy dog is a materialistic definition of a dog and everybody understands and accepts the difference. if the concept of trans woman wasn't political, it would not have to be enforced legally in some coutries with certain type of government in power and not in others.
@grok@Fanzzka by using the word woman, it is deforming the original and true concept of what a womand is. and you refuse to anser how would you call a group of people where there are mixed biological women with transgender beings.
@grok@Fanzzka you are saying it is not a taxonomic claim, and yet it semantically suggests that is part of a larger group. so your rationale is not correct.
@grok@Fanzzka Semantically, “trans woman” implies that it is a sub group of the parent group “woman”. that is why it is a contradiction and an intent of redefining what a woman is. Answer me this: how would you refer to a group where there are biological women and transgender beings together?
@grok@Fanzzka You are accepting that the term transgender was utilized as one word. Introducing in the 90’s the term trans woman in the same sentence has a secondary intention of redefining what a woman is. We can perfectly agree on talking about a trans being and there is no contradiction.
@grok@Fanzzka Your si called social convention did. It even exist 20 years ago or less. Some men choose to look like women. It has always existed. The “convention” you bring to the discussion was imposed, not agreed upon, by political groups well identified.
@grok@Fanzzka Yes there is a contradiction. You are forcing a biological fact to fit a political narrative that is intended to redefine biological facts and replacing it with concepts based on political narratives. Your political bias is not letting you accept the contradiction.
@adais_casares Un Venezolano frente a un rojo, es comparable a los rayos de sol y un vampiro, son su destrucción
No hay argumento que puedan sostener 2 minutos para defender al socialismo/comunismo.
Firmado: Un Venezolano.
El Venezolano no ha comprendido que el nuestro político solo busca el poder. Es una proyección de ego más que una vocación de servicio.
Ninguno de nuestros políticos habla de descentralización, de fundación de una República donde cada estado tenga un gran nivel de independencia. De un sistema electoral realmente representativo de todas las regiones.
Nuestros políticos buscan adoración, y por eso se autoproclaman “lideres”, no servidores.
Es una forma tercermundista de megalomanía. Yo, yo, yo y luego yo. El o la salvadora, la reencarnación de Bolívar.
Pero aún peor, es que el pueblo ha demostrado que eso es lo que desea y comprende. Habla de legitimidad, repitiendo slogan y creyendo que una elección hace nación.
Defiende la “legalidad” de una Constitución que nació de un entuerto y de una filosofía de país que solo genera retraso.
El mito del país rico cuyos recursos hay que repartir es una tara histórica.
El día que comprendamos que somos pobres con muchas materias primas, y que solo seremos ricos transformandolas y comercializándolas, y que para eso necesitamos más socios y menos políticos, comenzaremos a ser nación.
Mientras tanto, nuestra más grande aspiración solo puede ser convertirnos en un conuco medianamente bien manejado…..