la grandota

my heart lies in the hands of Celine

[la grandota @anusrainbow]

You should be able to sue your nail lady for giving you a bunch of hang nails

[la grandota @anusrainbow]

I work hard so she can sleep like this #bluecollar @jakesluterland

[g. @GeauxGabrielle]

THIS. IS. BAD. Right now only funds that are from ill-gotten gains are banned. This WILL be used against Black people, immigrants, people of color, etc. This will be used to criminalize the bail funds (which are already being targeted under RICO laws in some states).

This WILL backfire.

[la grandota @anusrainbow]

I need a IV and an enema stat

[la grandota @anusrainbow]

I really really need to pass away

[la grandota @anusrainbow]

The last two shots were my idea and I'm evil and satanic for that

[la grandota @anusrainbow]

Someone help me

[la grandota @anusrainbow]

WHAT is netflixs deal with putting all their actors in these GOD AWFUL colored contacts it actually drives me crazy

[la grandota @anusrainbow]

I love reading my old tweets and wondering what they were about

[la grandota @anusrainbow]

Im goin wild but i love that for me

[Ryan Hart @thisdudelikesAI]

A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking AI to write their breakup texts.

So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world.

What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable.

Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used AI models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations.

The first thing they measured was how often AI agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the AI simply told you what you wanted to hear instead.

Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the AI endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described.

The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic AI or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable AI came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use AI again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding.

The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months.
Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight.

Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now.

She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the AI felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.

[la grandota @anusrainbow]

Bruhhhhhh my oil change is $120

[la grandota @anusrainbow]

Just applied for graduation dang cant believe it's finally happening

[Free Talk Live @FreeTalkLive]

You have every right to know what your government is doing, and they have no right to know what you are doing.

That is why they are called public servants and we are called private citizens.

Instead, the relationship has been inverted. The state hides behind secrecy, classified files, and redactions while demanding total visibility into your finances, communications, movement, and behavior.

A society where the rulers live in privacy while the population lives under surveillance is the very definition of tyranny.

[glocky @chefkumquat]

i remember i got jumped at 10am once. i was confused how them niggaz even linked up dat early. yall had a sleepover or sumn???

[la grandota @anusrainbow]

Facebook loves suggesting regulars from the strip club I use to bartend at to me

[g. @GeauxGabrielle]

Speaking of gerrymandering, have you heard of prison gerrymandering?

White Republicans use incarcerated people to be counted by the census as residents of the town the PRISON is located in rather than their home communities. This increases their political representation and FUNDING for those districts while incarcerated people themselves cannot vote.

What you allow to happen to incarcerated people will happen to you.

[la grandota @anusrainbow]

Work should always be able to be done from the couch

[la grandota @anusrainbow]

I love getting spoiled

[karlita 🎭 @youreekofweed]

hoes will be soo afraid of getting fat, but be male centered and narcissistic