Pak Army entered India
Beheaded an Indian solider
Took his severed head to Pakistan
Family had to sit on hunger strike to get some action from the UPA government
Always wonder why people over 35 are such hardcore Modi supporters
England went back because there is no airspace disruption between India and Europe.
West Indies couldn’t do it because, first, there are NO direct flights between India and the West Indies. Their journey usually involves multiple connections, mostly through the Gulf, which has airspace restrictions now. Their original tickets were for this route. So they couldn't go.
Now you’ll say, why not through Europe? Here’s why: first, very few flights go from India to the West Indies via Europe. Second, switching to Europe at the last minute isn’t trivial because transit visa requirements can apply for some players. Third, you need 30–40 seats together for players, staff, and equipment. Flights from Europe to Caribbean islands are limited and are already full.
So no, this isn’t about “different rules.” It’s about geography, aviation logistics, and international travel constraints, things that should be obvious before shouting about imaginary double standards.
Whether the attempted shoe attack on the CJI was right or wrong is a pointless debate because almost all opinions are biased.
Most of those criticising the lawyer and taking the moral high ground would have been celebrating and calling it an act of defiance if someone had attempted the same to the PM.
So, instead of obsessing over the act, we should be asking: what pushed a senior lawyer, who has followed the law his entire life, to take such an extreme step? The same ecosystem that invokes empathy to humanise even terrorists has suddenly gone blind to motive in this case. Here we’re not talking about a radicalised youth, but a seasoned legal professional who knowingly jeopardised his career and future. What drove him to that point?
Since the CJI is known to be a Gandhian, he should avoid pressing charges. No shoe even touched him. A dignified response would be to invite the lawyer for a conversation over tea, hear his grievance directly, and reflect on what compelled him.
If the CJI stands for justice and balance, he should understand the sentiment, not just the incident. And after that, he should publicly apologise for his remark about Lord Vishnu and bring closure to the matter.
Govt is getting too arrogant on the E20 petrol issue. They only listen to street protests or the court, and the middle class is weak in both.
So here’s a third option: #NoCarSeptember. Come what may, don’t buy a car in September. Postpone plans as late as possible. If cancelling a booking, tell the dealer why. Travel only when necessary so fuel use also drops. Make it a movement, share in WhatsApp groups, urge people, build consensus.
It can work because it hits the govt where it hurts, revenue. A united buying pause can push the auto and fuel industry to pressure policymakers faster than any protest or petition. Don’t go down without a fight.
"In UPA 2, every minister was taking money and even the bureaucrats were involved in it. Jayanti Natarajan sat on files. I wrote to the PMO but they ignored it. This was all going on in the name of Sonia Gandhi."
- Former Coal Secretary Anil Swarup.
India should not be buying oil from Russia. But China, an adversary and the number one buyer of Russian and Iranian oil, got a 90-day tariff pause. Don’t give China a pass and burn a relationship with a strong ally like India.
I hope all retired Army officers will agitate & demand for strong action against this Army officer just the way they do if any of their officer is beaten up by anyone
This is horrendous behaviour @adgpi
Hey @grok would the descendants of slaves in America be better off today if their ancestors were never brought to the United States and instead stayed in Africa?
Owaisi is pro Muslim but when he is pro India, Hindus support him.
Modi is pro India but when he is pro Hindu, Muslims oppose him.
That's the difference.