SpaceCoin

SpaceCoin (SPC) — Coming Soon
100X starts with a mechanism. 🚀
✈️ TG: Partnerships: [email protected]

[SpaceCoin @apogeespacecoin]

Everyone wants the next 100X.

But few ask:
What’s actually behind it?

SpaceCoin is a mechanism-driven 100X vision. 🚀

Not just another token.
More than just another tax model.

A mechanism designed to turn transactions, holding, and referrals into a self-reinforcing flywheel.

Every buy & sell generates a transaction tax.

The transaction tax is fully allocated across three core functions:

→ Holder Dividend
Distributed in SPCXB, based on holdings.

→ Direct Burn
The corresponding amount of SpaceCoin is permanently burned, reducing supply.

→ Referral Pool
Distributed through the referral mechanism based on eligible referred holdings.

100X isn’t the destination.
When the mechanism scales, the real potential has only just begun.
The future isn’t fully priced in yet. 🚀

[SpaceCoin @apogeespacecoin]

Tokenization is moving beyond putting assets on-chain.

In Q2 2026, Centrifuge's tokenized S&P 500 exposure recorded $118M in cumulative trading volume.

The bigger milestone is what comes next:
• Trading beyond traditional market hours
• Using tokenized exposure in DeFi
• Borrowing against assets without selling them
The real potential of tokenization isn't just changing the format of an asset. It's expanding what people can do with it.

[Indexio @Indexi0]

Tokenized stocks are only part of the story on @base. 🔵

Centrifuge reported $118M in Q2 trading volume for its tokenized S&P 500 exposure.

Think about where this goes:

📊 Custom stock indexes
🤖 AI-managed strategies
💸 Onchain payments
🏦 Stock-backed lending
🌎 Global market access

The next generation of investing is being built now.

https://t.co/FVI1K8PhEy

[SpaceCoin @apogeespacecoin]

NFTs could become more than collectibles.

Imagine an NFT acting as a gateway to an on-chain financial product — where the real question isn't just what the NFT represents, but what assets sit behind it and what rights holders actually have.

Three things matter:
• What asset backs the structure?
• Who legally owns or controls that asset?
• What rights and risks come with holding the token?
Tokenization opens new possibilities. Transparency is what makes them meaningful.

[Misfits NFT @0xMisfitsNFT]

MISFITS NFT × THE MALLARD ORDER

The Mallard Order is coming to @RobinhoodCrypto.

10,000 vessels every one owns an on-chain Vault that
holds real tokenized stock.

Secured for our community:
🦆 20 FREE MALLARDS
🎫 30 GTD WL

7 FREE MALLARDS & 10 GTD WL IN THIS X TWEET.

13 FREE MALLARDS & 20 GTD WL FOR MISFITS NFT HOLDERS.

To enter:
✅ Follow @TMO_RH + @0xMisfitsNFT
✅ Repost + Like
✅ Comment your EVM address

Ends when there are enough participants.

The Crypt is watching. 🦆👁️

[SpaceCoin @apogeespacecoin]

A token burn is only one part of the story.

On October 17, UNI burn activity was around 18,000 tokens — below the reported 14-day average of 31,100.

Daily figures can fluctuate, especially on quieter weekends. The bigger questions are:

• Is protocol activity generating sustainable fee revenue?
• How consistently does that activity translate into burns?
• What does the long-term supply trend look like?
A burn mechanism matters. Its long-term impact matters more.

[web3｜ Hayek @hayekdata]

18,000 $UNI burned on UTC 10/17 (~$130K), 42% below the 14-day avg of 31.1K.
Weekends run quiet: the last 4 weekend days were the 4 smallest of the past 14.

🎁 Guess today's $UNI burn below. Closest by 12:00 SGT wins 1 UNI. One guess each, no edits. We never DM.

[SpaceCoin @apogeespacecoin]

Should creator fees be shared with holders?

A 50/50 split sounds fair on paper. But the real question is what the split is designed to achieve.

Creators need resources to keep building.
Holders need a reason to stay involved.
The project needs a mechanism that supports long-term growth.
The best fee model isn't necessarily 50/50. It's the one that aligns incentives without starving either side.
Fee allocation is more than a percentage. It's a statement about who the project is built for.

[Diprivan @Crypto_d0c]

@pumpfuninu Have you considered adding holder rewards? Like 50/50 split with creator fees?

[SpaceCoin @apogeespacecoin]

A referral program is more powerful when it rewards real product usage — not just sign-ups.

Meteora connects referrals to eligible liquidity positions and shares protocol-fee revenue with participants.

That creates a clearer growth loop:

More referrals → more liquidity → more trading activity → more fees → more incentives.

The key isn't the referral percentage alone. It's whether the incentive is tied to sustainable activity.

[𝐍𝐢𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐨🐂🀄️ @NicoloAlpha]

Always ready for the next opportunity on Solana! 🚀

Join Meteora with my referral code and earn a 2% kickback on the protocol fees from your eligible DLMM liquidity positions (paid in USDC).

Start here → https://t.co/nRqYQ9SFpJ

[SpaceCoin @apogeespacecoin]

Buybacks and burns are not the same.

A buyback brings tokens off the open market and into a project's control.

A burn permanently removes tokens from circulation when executed by a verifiable burn mechanism.

Both are token-economic design choices. Neither guarantees price appreciation.

What matters is how a project's economic activity connects to token supply — and whether the mechanism is transparent and sustainable.

At SpaceCoin, the focus is on mechanism-driven growth, with a burn mechanism built into the design.

[Nafiz Imtiaz @NafizImtiaz6_9]

➤ Pyth is taking a new direction with its token economics.

→ 100% of the Pyth DAO’s allocated revenue share will now fund open-market $PYTH buybacks.

→ The increase from 33% to 100% reflects growing revenue and a stronger focus on the ecosystem.

→ As Pyth expands, its revenue strategy is becoming more closely tied to $PYTH

FT> @PythNetwork @mdomcahill

[SpaceCoin @apogeespacecoin]

A launchpad is more than a place to launch a token.

Its real design shows up in three questions:

How is liquidity created and protected?

Who benefits from the fees generated by activity?

Can the community participate in the system's growth?

These aren't just features. They shape the incentives for creators, traders, and holders.

The strongest platforms don't just launch tokens. They design systems people have reasons to use.

[VT_Crypt @cryptos_uni]

The crypto space is massive. I prefer projects that actually innovate instead of copying everything else.

Not all launchpads, trading apps are the same @binance @coinbase , @HyperliquidX , @farcaster_xyz @clanker_world , @fomo @ponsdotfamily and now @Torchpaddotfun

Every team differentiates somehow.

Using one doesn’t stop you from using the others.

For developers, the reason to launch somewhere schould be because of the" LIQUIDITY".

Most launchpads still have the same problems: thin liquidity at the start, liquidity that can be pulled, bonding curves that migrate, or fees that get bypassed.

On @Torchpaddotfun

100% of the supply goes straight into a real Uniswap v4 pool from second one
No seeding required, no team bag held back

Liquidity is locked forever — nobody can pull it, not even Torch

The pool grows automatically (LP fees + any tax you route to liquidity)

Your community can provide liquidity directly in the app and earn the 0.3% fee.

You still keep control of your creator fees and can send part of the tax to holders, burns, or deeper liquidity.

Fat liquidity from day one. Locked forever. Community earns while they support the token.

Most platforms treat liquidity as an afterthought. @Torchpaddotfun makes it the foundation!

As a trader, the question is simple: which app actually gives me the most advantages?

Hold $TORCH → you get a share of the fees

Trade on the app https://t.co/9vgg2YxmRV
→ you also get a share of the fees

Maybe I haven’t looked hard enough.
Can someone name another Launchpad Trading and Social app that shares fees with holders like this?

Light the $TORCH

#BTC
#Crypto

[SpaceCoin @apogeespacecoin]

Tokenized stocks become more interesting when they can do more than trade.

If stock tokens can be used as collateral, holders may be able to access liquidity without selling their exposure.

But LTV is only one part of the equation.

The real questions are:
• How is the collateral valued?
• What triggers liquidation?
• How does the protocol handle volatility and market closures?
Connecting traditional assets to DeFi creates new utility — but risk management is what makes it sustainable.

[omerbektas @omerbekta_s]

@petrov_base_eth The 55% LTV ratio implies a borrower can leverage up to 45% of their tokenized stock collateral.

[SpaceCoin @apogeespacecoin]

@ThreeCyclesDeep Exactly. Protocol growth and token value are two different things. The key is having a mechanism that connects real usage to token holders.

[SpaceCoin @apogeespacecoin]

@StockSavvyShay The opportunity is massive, but execution is what turns global reach into real revenue. Starship could be a major accelerator.

SPC believes in the future SpaceX is building. 🚀

[SpaceCoin @apogeespacecoin]

@kunwweb3 Tokenization opens the door. Liquidity and real utility are what make people stay.

The real breakthrough is when tokenized assets become useful beyond simply trading them.

[SpaceCoin @apogeespacecoin]

@ElonMuskPDA The strongest conviction comes when a compelling narrative meets a mechanism people can believe in. Hype gets attention; sustained belief keeps a community moving.

[SpaceCoin @apogeespacecoin]

@cl_samm Being right on the fundamentals means little if you underestimate the power of narrative and crowd psychology. In meme coins, timing and collective belief can matter just as much.

[SpaceCoin @apogeespacecoin]

@treasuryox Starlink gives the SpaceX vision a real business foundation. Execution is what turns that vision into lasting value.
SPC believes in the future SpaceX is building. 🚀

[SpaceCoin @apogeespacecoin]

What if community growth rewarded real attention, not just wallet connections?

CONSO is experimenting with an interesting model: organic post impressions can help creators qualify for its free-mint BOT NFTs.

The bigger idea is connecting content distribution to participation in a product ecosystem.

But impressions are only the first step.

The real test is whether attention turns into active users, lasting contributions, and meaningful product usage.

A strong growth loop doesn't just attract attention. It gives people a reason to stay.

[DENJI 🔶 @RektDENJI]

CONSO Just Dropped Their First NFT Series - Free Mint, 5,555 Bots, and It’s Actually Useful

If you’re deep in AI tools and tired of your prompt history, token burn, and model usage being scattered everywhere, CONSO (@conso_xyz) is building something that might actually fix that.

They’re positioning themselves as a reputation layer for AI users. The idea is simple: instead of your usage data living in random tabs across ChatGPT, Claude, Midjourney, or whatever else you’re rotating, CONSO tracks it in one place. That includes:

- Prompt usage
- Token consumption
- Model calls
- Estimated costs
- Prompt quality scores

Basically, it turns your messy AI activity into a clean, personal record. Think of it as a credit score, but for how you actually use AI.

The Current Play: CONSO Bots
They just opened eligibility checks for their first NFT collection - CONSO Bots.

- Supply: 5,555
- Mint price: Free

The twist is that you’re not just clicking a button and minting. You’re earning bots based on organic impressions from posts about the project. Post about CONSO (Extension, Miner, Bots, or your real experience using it), rack up views the legit way, and unlock more bots. Higher impressions = more bots, with a hard cap per account.

How to Check & Participate
1. Go to their site and connect your X account
2. Check if you’re eligible
3. Follow @conso_xyz
4. Drop an original tweet mentioning them (content about CONSO stuff or your actual usage)
5. Submit the tweet link for review

Important rules (they’re enforcing these):
- Only posts after October 16 count
- No copy-paste, no AI-generated spam, no off-topic “just tagging them” posts
- Impressions have to be organic - no buying views or engagement pods
- Don’t make up rewards or token prices

If your post gets approved, you get confirmed for the bots. It’s free, so there’s basically zero downside to checking eligibility first.

This is still early, and it’s very much in the “post and earn” phase right now. Whether CONSO ends up being a solid AI data layer or just another temporary farm remains to be seen, but the core idea (aggregating your AI usage into something ownable) is one of the cleaner concepts floating around in the AI + crypto overlap lately.

Worth checking the site and seeing if you qualify. Free mint with actual utility attached is rare enough that it’s worth the 2 minutes.

[SpaceCoin @apogeespacecoin]

@goldentouch73 @pete_rizzo_ Exactly. Starlink gives the SpaceX vision a real commercial foundation. The bigger story is what happens when ambitious technology meets recurring demand. 🚀

[SpaceCoin @apogeespacecoin]

The most compelling growth stories don't rely on vision alone.

They turn ambitious ideas into products, paying customers, and real economic activity.

Starlink makes the SpaceX story more than a distant possibility. It gives the vision a business foundation that markets can evaluate.

SPC believes in the future SpaceX is building. 🚀

[Miguel @MDCTrades305]

@growthrapidly $SPCX for me Joel. Starlink is printing real cash today, the other two are still story stocks until the revenue actually shows up

[SpaceCoin @apogeespacecoin]

When everyone is chasing the next candle, we ask a different question:

What makes the system worth believing in?

Hype fades. Mechanisms deserve scrutiny.

#SpaceCoin

[SpaceCoin @apogeespacecoin]

A vision gets people looking.

A mechanism gives them something real to examine.

A community gives that vision room to grow.

That's the idea behind SpaceCoin.

Mechanism-driven growth.

[SpaceCoin @apogeespacecoin]

Stablecoin adoption isn't free.

Circle paid $819M in USDC distribution partner and transaction costs in H1 2026.

That's a bigger lesson about crypto infrastructure:

Building a financial network requires more than issuing a token. It requires distribution, liquidity, compliance, and real-world access.

The winners won't just issue digital dollars. They'll build the networks that make them useful.

[Cointelegraph @Cointelegraph]

🔥 UPDATE: Circle says it paid about $819M to USDC distribution partners and transaction costs in H1 2026.