@elonmusk Grok calculated a Complex Backward-Looking Evidence Analysis of #JFKassassination to 99.9% confidence
Oswald shoots 100%, but LHO's gun couldn't fire all 4 shots causing 9 wounds, splatter
Exact timings, Locations w/in 5'
Full Analysis:https://t.co/Ck4IEieXkA
@factsdontlie10 I just ran an apple step test. If you carry a phone stabile and horizontally. As you would if it were in the pocket of a dead man being carried.
It records no steps.
@StarTribune Of course she does. Our government is broken at every level.
End funding of all NGO's, they are doing work our government is not allowed to do.
The democrat party is a kleptocracy.
@WildGoo69031318@geraldposner I suggest you and posner start using AI to consider all the evidence. It takes some skill you might not have to submit data, not opinions and set up rules for a BWEBAnalysis.
I put the post above into GROK and here is the response. https://t.co/huFVTkj27q
I will give a pre-amble before talking about first shot:
All evidence must be explained as independent acts, never part of a grand theory as Specter attempted. A Backward-Working Evidence Based Analysis. Since there is MORE evidence here than any other crime: {9 or 10 wounds, different metallurgy, fragments, so much splatter, brain remnants thrown 25 feet, hundreds of witnesses, Films photographs, confessions (Hunt, Files etc), the parkland doctors.} it may be beyond the limit of a single humans ability.
All evidence must be weighed and the number of shooters, position heights , bullet types and timings must be weighed. There are two options: single shooter no help. Or a conspiracy of people working together with 1,2,3,4 shooters then work to find a best fit.
I used Grok to do the analysis. Giving as much of the data as possible. Single shooter no help could account for 20% to 40% of the evidence.
Now onto first bullet. It is the most difficult to explain. JFK has arms on throat before Connallys's lapel moves. So we know it happened while he was obscured by the road sign in Zapruder. Dictabelt and witnesses confirm about 1.6s between shots 1 & 2.
A shot from TSBD 6th floor at 65' would continue on it downward path as Connallys did. It would not deflect out a tiny and clean hole in the throat, turn sideways and slam into Connally in what felt like a double hit. Specters MB theory is not repeatable so it is not scientific.
One can already see the complications here and we have considered maybe 2% of the total evidence. Shot one is impossible. It excludes a single shooter, no accomplices. Now one must figure the total shots and total shooters for best evidence fit, not best theory fit.
Shot one has two possibilities.
1. The shot enters the back and exits the throat, causing little bleeding. Very small non-Frangible piercing (22 caliber) bullet shot at a low angle (like the Dal-Tex second floor corner window. Bullet exit would likely hit windshield (10 witnesses to that). JFK himself would have had to press the exit tears in.
2. The back wound could be separate injury, maybe a fragment from Connallys tumbling bullet wound, which had to navigate a tree. (Yes it was an obstruction, 40' high, 40' away from building and 42' down Elm Street extension.
Parkland ER and Surgical docs are very experienced at gunshots and have a close and immediate observation, even cutting into the neck wound. They see it as an entrance. They miss the almost bloodless shallow back wound.
That would mean the neck wound had to come from the front and oh boy.
----
The great problem here is, no one starts with the statement: "I am not smart enough to figure this out, with my theory" hence the evidence is mishandled, interpreted and cherry-picked.
Posner gets paid for each book of "Case Closed" he sells, he gets attaboys from local radio TV hosts, he has material conflicts. Those conflicts are not acknowledged, if he wrote a "case open" or "whoops Specter was wrong", he would bring scientific balance to his arguments.
No one wants this to be a conspiracy (from the left: Mob, Castro, Russia, LBJ or the right conservative military complex) , multiple shooters makes the JFK assassination 100x sadder than a lone nutty gunman. No one acknowledges those unspoken feelings.
@geraldposner True, He shot at Kennedy. Wanted him dead. But there is no way that he could have caused those wounds found in the autopsy.
Two upward shots from the back.
@WildGoo69031318@geraldposner It's the most accurate topographical map to date.
Shots 2, 3, 4 are locked in
The only problem with shot one is the Parkland doctors saw the throat wound as an entrance not an exit and the forensics did not see a pass through. Shot 4 from the grassy knoll is the most obvious
@WildGoo69031318@geraldposner The splatter evidence is conclusive. Tague curbstrike could only come from Dal-Tex second at 6.9s.
One must use backward working evidence analysis. Both of you work from theory.
@craigaroo@geraldposner JFK's arms were up to throat BEFORE Connally turns, his lapel moves at 1.6s with a descending shot. (Likely hit branch) causing a blunt force slam on entry.
Bullet into JFK's back was small caliber missile that pierced on entry and exit. 10 witnessed windshield crack/hole
JFK's arms arms are up AND clutching throat PRIOR to z223 (Shot two which moves C's Lapel) Jackie is already concerned.
Shot #2 is a steep shot and follows trajectory thru Connally (four wounds).
The tree still obstructed the 6th floor likely causing shot 2 to tumble.
You ignore Tague curb miss.
Kekius alludes to those in the know, who get the ironic humor of 4chan.
Irrepressibly libertarian, funny free thinkers. Pepe the Frog is their mascot, and the use of Roman culture makes it all fun.
KeK is LoL but more keh heh heh heh
How one laughs when they defeat someone in a video game
@MarioNawfal@AsraNomani Were these organizations involved in J6!?!
Cell phone ping data comparing these current rallies, (or protests against Kavanaugh) and J6 might be enlightening