Appsalot

[Appsalot @Appsalot17]

@SwiggyCares 250689493933507

[Appsalot @Appsalot17]

If a product is damaged, ideally it should be replaced or a refund should be processed @SwiggyCares . Not giving a reason for rejection is quite ridiculous and unacceptable.

[Appsalot @Appsalot17]

@Basi_cally take the special one. I've ordered them quite a few times in different cities and I always find the ratio of meat to sauce good.

[Appsalot @Appsalot17]

@credofly Still very good according to me. The monthly cap is much higher than live plus or SBI cashback and lot less exclusions too. The app is the only main problem and even that's gotten marginally better.

[Appsalot @Appsalot17]

@niketrajdwivedi You missed Original Burger Co.

[Karti P Chidambaram @KartiPC]

If the dancing outraged you more than the AK-47 then you are a Whatsapp uncle.

[Gitanjali J Angmo @GitanjaliAngmo]

When @Wangchuk66 was detained, the BJP IT cell called us anti-national, Chinese agents, foreign-funded, and every other label they could manufacture.
Today, because we called the Congress' protest at PM's residence insincere, Congress trolls are calling us Sanghis, RSS and BJP stooges.
Different flags. Same playbook. The rot has infected our entire political culture.
India needs more than just a change of government. It needs a change in the very grammar of politics, where disagreement is met with dialogue, not demonisation; where patriotism is measured by integrity, not party affiliation; and where truth matters more than tribal loyalty.
@narendramodi @RahulGandhi

[Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) @internetfreedom]

The Delhi Police's takedown drive against posts critical of the Prime Minister is unconstitutional.

New Delhi, 27 July 2026

Media reports today state that the Delhi Police has directed social media platforms to remove posts, videos, memes and reels containing remarks it describes as "abusive", "offensive" and "objectionable" towards the Prime Minister, uploaded during the student protests at Jantar Mantar and after the 'Sansad Chalo' march of 20 July 2026. At least three platforms have reportedly received notices. Several posts have already been taken down. A dedicated police team is monitoring social media to identify further content, and reports indicate that criminal proceedings are contemplated against those who posted it. No order has been published. While reports indicate the notices invoke the Information Technology Act, the specific provision relied upon and the text of the notices remain undisclosed.

The Internet Freedom Foundation condemns this takedown drive and calls for the notices to be disclosed and withdrawn.

On the reports available, the content being removed is political expression. The movement at Jantar Mantar has been conducted as much through reels, memes, posters and digital artwork as through assembly on the ground. This is how a digital native generation raised online speaks about accountability. As per Article 19(2) restrictions on speech only on eight specified grounds. Offensiveness is not one of them. In Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 1, the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the IT Act precisely because expressions such as "grossly offensive" and causing "annoyance" were vague, subjective, and swept protected speech within their net. Eleven years later, the Delhi Police is applying the same standard through informal notices and legal powers which are not being publicly disclosed.

As per existing practices there are two routes for removing online content. The first is Section 69A of the IT Act read with the Blocking Rules, 2009, which requires a reasoned order, committee review, and notice to the originator, as the Delhi High Court affirmed in Tanul Thakur v. Union of India (2022). The second is Section 79(3)(b), which Shreya Singhal read down to require a court order or a government notification strictly confined to Article 19(2) grounds. If these notices were routed through the Sahyog Portal, they rest on a regime whose constitutionality remains under challenge before multiple High Courts. However, even if it is used police notices citing offensiveness satisfy neither.

Reports that platforms were told the content violates "their policies" make the defect worse, the police have no mandate to enforce the community guidelines of private companies. Unpublished directions are also contrary to Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) 3 SCC 637, which requires that orders restricting fundamental rights be published so that they can be challenged. If the underlying theory is defamation of the Prime Minister, the police have no role at all. Defamation under Section 356 of the BNS is a non-cognizable offence, prosecuted only on a complaint by the person aggrieved under Section 222 of the BNSS.

Our demands

1. The Delhi Police must publish every notice issued, the legal provision invoked, and the list of URLs affected.

2. Notices directed at satire, criticism, and political commentary must be withdrawn. Any removal must follow the procedures under Section 69A or a judicial order.

3. No criminal proceedings should be initiated against persons for speech that does not meet the constitutional threshold of incitement.

4. Platforms must decline requests unsupported by valid legal orders, notify affected users, and disclose the number of government demands in their transparency reports.

Students who question an examination system are exercising their fundamental rights and deleting their posts will not delete their questions.

Reports referred to:

1. Times of India, "Delhi Police orders removal of offensive posts against PM Narendra Modi linked to NEET paper leak protests", 27 July 2026
2. News18, "Delhi Police Issues Notices To Social Media Platforms Over Offensive Posts Against PM Modi During Jantar Mantar Protest", 27 July 2026

[Appsalot @Appsalot17]

@ku1deep What made you think there ever was Civility to begin with?

[Appsalot @Appsalot17]

@mishra_abhi So, if we had better educational reforms, they probably wouldn't have hurled such abuse?

[Appsalot @Appsalot17]

@JethmalaniM Why compare what was done 100 years ago with what is being done now. Protests change, politics change, landscapes change. Believing everything must be done a certain way is why we never move forward. I also didn’t understand it at first, but now I do.

[Appsalot @Appsalot17]

@St_Brosephs You are still doing a lot representing the generation gone by... You've got the Gen Z blood in you or the other way around whichever you prefer!

[Rajdeep Sardesai @sardesairajdeep]

BIG BREAKING NEWS: HRD minister @dpradhanbjp RESIGNS!

[Milann Desai @Milan_reports]

I worked for this company once, the problem is all my former colleagues are studio anchors and are so far away from reality. I covered the CJP protests for 31 days, I never saw them anywhere even remotely near the Jantar Mantar grounds even once. People need to search for their work, how many days they spent at Jantar Mantar, search for their names and their videos, and you will know the truth. End.

[ASHUTOSH MISHRA @JournoAshutosh]

You guys need to talk to each other.

[Appsalot @Appsalot17]

@BJP4India Charity begins at home. So, lead by example please.

[Appsalot @Appsalot17]

@dpradhanbjp @narendramodi Got it, everyone has a WhatsApp group or probably Telegram and you have all been ‘asked’ to post random upcoming developments. Distract and conquer?

[Appsalot @Appsalot17]

@narendramodi Are you worried we will ask other ministers to resign, so you are pitching in for them? 🤔

[Appsalot @Appsalot17]

@svembu If you want to compare India to a first world country, do it at every granularity. No monopoly, accountability at every level across all industries; Food and Beverage, IT, Infra, Manufacturing, etc. Don’t selectively pick out what fits your convenience.