gabriel

[Christopher Snowdon @cjsnowdon]

I am once again asking people to take responsibility for their own behaviour.

[KenFarmer ⒶⓋ @KenFarmerTV]

If one can get it on Amazon by 7pm tomorrow, its not banned. These people drive me insane.

[sasha na copa @lobotosasha]

Eu reclamado de IPVA
Aparece fã de ipva pra defender nos comentários.
Eu reclamo da indústria da multa
Aparece um fã de radar de 40km/h nos comentários.

Chega ser inacreditável esse site ser de graça kkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

[violet ݁⋆⭒˚.⋆ @violetnyann]

democracy is so awesome, 607 out of 450,380,300 got to vote for whether the EU can scan _all_ of your non e2ee encrypted messages until 2028

[Não Esqueço @CanalNaoEsqueco]

A bostileira feminista foi até a polícia de Dublin, na Irlanda, denunciar o diretor da escola DCE English por agressão.

Por sorte, a escola possui câmeras de segurança....

Não sei o que é pior, a bostileira com trancinhas de maconheira destruindo a escola e agredindo todo mundo ou o namorado lango lango falando que "no momento que ele encostou, acabou"

Essa é a geração criada por mais de 20 anos de PT: Vitimistas, arrogantes e barraqueiros com QI 80.

[Macjosan @macjosan]

Te van a imponer el euro digital, ChatControl, conducir con una cámara para ver si pestañeas más de la cuenta,...

Ellos:
- Tienen su dinero fuera del control europeo
- ChatControl no aplica a altos cargos por temas de seguridad
- Llevan chofer o viajan en falcon

Pero no te quejes que es por nuestro bien. Sé un buen ciudadno y acata las órdenes.

[MW4Liberty @MW4Liberty]

We seal envelopes not because the letter contains a conspiracy, but because the contents belong exclusively to the sender and the receiver.

The "nothing to hide" argument is pure corporate/state propaganda. Privacy isn't about hiding a crime; it's about deciding who gets access to your life. It’s a boundary of power, not a shield for guilt.

[Alexis Hall @lexikodi]

When they try to justify the surveillance state by saying “it’s for your safety” (aside from that being a bitchass reason to surrender your rights in the first place), understand that this redcoat shit is what they mean. Fireworks on the 4th of July.

[nyara @nyaraVT]

China scanning private messages - bad, evil, dystopian, mass surveillance

EU scanning private messages - good, protecting children, necessary, nothing to worry about

[Erik Hoffmann @ErikHoffma35980]

The European Union is going full-on 1984.

[Chubby♨️ @kimmonismus]

Today is a dark day for freedom and democracy in Europe. General chat surveillance has been implemented in Brussels. A disgrace.

The so-called Chat Control 1.0 cleared a crucial hurdle in the European Parliament today. This means platforms may once again be allowed to scan private messages, officially on a “voluntary” basis, but in practice this marks the return of indiscriminate monitoring of private communication.

What makes this especially bitter is that a majority of the MEPs who voted were reportedly against it. According to Patrick Breyer, 314 MEPs voted against the regulation, 276 voted in favor and 17 abstained. And yet the rejection failed because it was not enough to have a simple majority of those voting. An absolute majority of all MEPs would have been required.

That is the democratic scandal.

When a majority of those present votes against a proposal and it still passes because a formal threshold is not reached, it does not feel like democratic decision-making to many citizens. It feels like a procedural trick.

And it becomes even more problematic when you look at the context: Chat Control had already been rejected before. Yet the issue was put back on the agenda shortly before the summer break, through an urgent procedure, at a time when absences could become decisive.

This is not just some technical regulation. It goes to the very core of private communication. It is about whether digital messages remain fundamentally private or whether platforms may systematically scan content again, without concrete suspicion, without a court order and without any individual cause.

A free society must not turn private communication into a potential surveillance zone. Anyone who takes digital fundamental rights seriously cannot accept millions of innocent people being placed under general suspicion.

Today, a dangerous signal was sent: fundamental rights can be hollowed out through procedural logic, timing and political tricks. Not through an open, clear and honest majority, but through a system in which absence effectively helps the supporters.

This is a dark day for Europe.

Not because the fight is over, but because today showed how easily digital fundamental rights come under pressure when surveillance logic, symbolic politics and institutional tricks come together.

Anyone who wants a free internet, anyone who wants to protect private communication and anyone who takes democracy seriously should talk about this.

Share this issue. Inform yourself. Look at who voted how. And never forget: freedom rarely disappears all at once. It disappears step by step, often in technical details, often in complicated procedures and often exactly when too few people are watching.

[Ofli @Oflicg]

Troque "escolas" por "hospitais" ou qualquer serviço público, a lógica é a mesma:

[HWL @HWLinvest]

Det är officiellt: Fulspelet i Bryssel gick i lås.

En majoritet av ledamöterna i salen röstade precis för att stoppa Chat Control. Men eftersom EU-topparna tvingade fram sin "hastprocedur" krävdes det plötsligt en absolut majoritet på 361 röster från hela parlamentet för att avvisa förslaget. Tack vare att de la omröstningen mitt under semstern, när bänkarna står tomma, var det i praktiken helt omöjligt att nå den spärren.

EU-ledningen lyckades alltså med konststycket att runda en demokratisk majoritet.

Återgå till en ren handelsorganisation? Ja tack, det här överstatliga monstret har spårat ur totalt.

[Gabriel @saintliberte]

Em Outubro eu votarei em quem me prometer Pena de Morte pra Ministro do STF 👍

só impeachment não é suficiente

[sasha na copa @lobotosasha]

Um reator nuclear custa o mesma coisa que as viagens que o Lula faz KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK

[Howling Wagner @HowlingWagner]

Male podcast: War History, Interstellar Travel, obscure tales from 70s rock bands
Woman Podcast: Being a Whore

[Mario ZNA @MarioBojic]

🚨🇪🇺 EU breaks its own rules to force chat surveillance!

The new law would allow authorities to read EVERY private message with no limits.

"Rejected twice - now pushed through in an emergency procedure."

Europe is getting worse than North Korea.

[@levelsio @levelsio]

🇪🇺 The EU is now for the 6th time trying to force Chat Control through which lets them scan ALL your private messages, photos and emails without a warrant

Implictly showing the EU is not democratic and not about what the people of Europe want, because once a law is rejected, you just re-submit it until nobody is watching and it's passed

November 2023: ❌ Chat Control is rejected
June 2024: ❌ Chat Control is rejected
October 2025: ❌ Chat Control is rejected
November 2025: ❌ Chat Control is rejected
March 2026: ❌ Chat Control is rejected
July 2026: 📝 Chat Control is back

Even the EU's own lawyers stated Chat Control is unconstitutional: "generalised message scanning is incompatible with Article 7 of the EU Charter"

You have to wonder why the EU is so adament about reading your private chats, right?

[Dr. Simon @goddek]

🚨 EVERY EUROPEAN NEEDS TO KNOW THIS:

The European Union is turning into an anti-democratic surveillance apparatus.

In March, the European Parliament REJECTED the extension of “Chat Control.”

So what did Brussels do?

While everybody is distracted from the World Cup, they furtively brought it back through a rarely used procedure and are trying again.

The goal is to allow private communications to be scanned under a derogation from normal ePrivacy protections.

They’ll have access to your private messages and your photos. And, as always, mass surveillance is being sold to you under the banner of “safety.”

The EU bureaucrats do not trust you.

They urgently want the infrastructure to surveil you.

And when its own Parliament votes the wrong way, the bureaucratic and anti-democratic machine simply finds another procedure and tries again.

The European Union is not protecting democracy.

It is becoming its enemy. And almost all CONSERVATIVES members of the parliament voted in favor of this Orwellian plan.

And now imagine a combination of governmental surveillance AND Palantir. SCARY!!!!

SHARE THIS. Europeans deserve to know what Brussels is doing to their privacy.