A

[A @arandomguy137]

@rektshrimp @realsaadasad I wish SF had a median 1br of $2500.
San Diego Zillow 1br < $2600 "around balboa park only" >800 rentals, many of them new buildings

ALL OF SF = 42 and many of them are ancient. SF is unbelievably cooked

[A @arandomguy137]

@Dickthbutcher @besttrousers @UpstandingMembr Oh? I thought what he meant was that working hours and experience are affected by gender and that's why you can't control for them.

[A @arandomguy137]

@besttrousers @Dickthbutcher @UpstandingMembr I think you're putting "different hiring rates" into the pay gap definition while they are not

[A @arandomguy137]

@UrbanCourtyard Baby steps I guess

[A @arandomguy137]

@mdburnell @Osint613 No

[A @arandomguy137]

@nkozyra @MTabarrok @NathanpmYoung You don't want them to think you do it randomly. Otherwise they'll risk it anyway

[A @arandomguy137]

@elons_lil_dicky @1solarsunders7 @talonross43 @social_actavis How is that related to god messaging Noah using lightning after the flood?

[A @arandomguy137]

@penguin74us @DocDeezWhat @AdamKinzinger I would like to request you to leave the goalpost alone

[A @arandomguy137]

@StatisticUrban "ideological purity" isn't that just... ideology? I mean the parties should have some principles right?

[A @arandomguy137]

@StatisticUrban Liberals criticizing expert-led governmental organizations. Interesting

[A @arandomguy137]

@pleeberw3md @SportsPhilly40 @the_transit_guy The reasoning perhaps isn't the same, just as the briefs do not provide a single argument. The result was the same, which is what determines "siding with Trump".

[A @arandomguy137]

@pleeberw3md @SportsPhilly40 @the_transit_guy Both Kavanaugh and Gorsuch rejected the idea that the citizenship clause of the constitution protects blanket birthright citizenship, or am I mistaken?

[A @arandomguy137]

@LD77mvpSZN @SportsPhilly40 @the_transit_guy Bruh

[A @arandomguy137]

@pleeberw3md @SportsPhilly40 @the_transit_guy I haven't read the majority opinion yet but 2 other justices also joined Alito/Thomas in the constitutional argument. I'm focusing on this case since you mentioned it as a perfect example.

[A @arandomguy137]

@LD77mvpSZN @SportsPhilly40 @the_transit_guy *sigh*
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

Now what

[A @arandomguy137]

@LD77mvpSZN @SportsPhilly40 @the_transit_guy I literally did? "Subject to the jurisdiction" is a phrase in the constitution. You think its meaning is simple and plain, the supreme court does not.

[A @arandomguy137]

@LD77mvpSZN @SportsPhilly40 @the_transit_guy I'm saying what you think is "plain" is not as plain many times. Can have different meanings based on the person's approach.

[A @arandomguy137]

@LD77mvpSZN @SportsPhilly40 @the_transit_guy Is "subject to the jurisdiction" plain and easy? If you think so I've got 3.5 supreme court justices that beg to differ. Same with "bear arms" or "Shall not be infringed" in 2nd amendment, "liberty" in abortion cases, "cruel" in grants pass case, and many more

[A @arandomguy137]

@LD77mvpSZN @SportsPhilly40 @the_transit_guy I meant any example of plain text of constitution infringed by conservatives

[A @arandomguy137]

@LD77mvpSZN @SportsPhilly40 @the_transit_guy First describe how it has been infringed upon by the conservatives, I'll bring you the liberal equivalent