For those asking for the detailed post on Desi Theranos and Atma Nirbhar Bharat Elizabeth Holmes, here it is in detailed slides 🔽 #scam#Temple#TechNews
Your coding agents are fast now.
The problem? They can move just as fast in the wrong direction.
Miss one update, and they can spend days building the wrong thing - costing you tokens and engineering time. That's why devs are still glued to their monitors.
Meet Serro: the Agentic TPM.
It keeps your people and coding agents working from the same evolving program. 👇 @serroai
I’ve been posting in this community since like two years ago. And not to sound like LI but we just hit a huge milestone at my startup so I wanted to share. Serro is fully live in production for a 300-person unicorn enterprise customer.
🤯 for me looking back.
If anyone is selling to enterprises or hoping to in the future, I’ll be happy to share any tips or what I learned.
Anyways if you’ll allow me:
TPM agents are long-running, multiplayer AI that help fast-moving product engineering teams continuously maintain shared program state and memory.
No other tool gives all your teams access to shared, team-resolved state and longitudinal memory by program name.
With Serro TPM agents, your teams and agents are always on the same program.
Is it just for me?
@Eatclub_ is spamming all food delivery apps with 100s of restaurant names but selling same dishes under the hood...
At this point... all delivery apps are just disguised forms of Eatclub
@Swiggy@zomato any comments?
"people think TPM is gonna be the job that gets replaced first. in reality, it's gonna be the hardest thing to replace."
new Dr. Niklas episode. I talk to @jakesrro (founder of Serro AI, ex-Apple engineering manager) about why every vertical agent makes the horizontal coordinator MORE essential, the client with 2 TPMs and 75 recurring reports, and the temporal knowledge graphs that give agents organizational memory.
DN #31: Agentic TPM, Temporal Knowledge Graphs & The Job AI Can't Replace (w/ Jake Kim)
Subscribe to join the build. 🚀☘️
🎧 Listen to the full episode here:
📺 YouTube: https://t.co/nCc6ehKTVx
🍎 Apple: https://t.co/YHAxDgqaeZ
🟢 Spotify: https://t.co/nXCyVMvFcU
TPM = mind-muscle connection for human-only orgs
Agentic TPM = mind-muscle connection for AI-native orgs
Programs are the repeated motions an organization chooses to prioritize and refine over time to stay competitive.
Here's how you know your company equipped for AI-native management:
1. Program execution history is retained
2. You have access to program-level visibility on effort and AI spend
3. Context and procedures are mapped to relevant programs
4. Downstream agents emit and consume live program signals
Agentic Technical Program Management isn't threatening your job if you're a TPM. It's the infrastructure for you to build upon.
@DTDCIndia, Scheduled a pickup 3 days ago... I had to call your customer support everyday and still the courier is sitting unhandled.
Let me know if you guys need a reminder and an accountability app. We can develop it for you for free
2022 - ChatGPT
2023 - prompts
2024 - copilots
2025 - agents
2026 - loops...
Underneath the buzz... there was always one core concept and it is gonna stay...
SKILL!
#skill
Requesting the Government of India - honorable President @rashtrapatibhvn, @PMOIndia to withdraw the fourth highest civilian award bestowed on this quack - to maintain credibility and sanctity of such awards. This is shameful and atrocious. This woman's social media accounts are now being witheld because of legal demands in India due to cognizance of the public health danger she promotes.
In her Padma Award citation, the red-lined sections mentions "claims of" cure of serious illnesses and chronic diseases - this is an outright violation of Drugs and Magic Remedies Act. This woman should be chargesheeted and these "wild" claims investigated. Show some respect to the public you serve @PadmaAwards
Indian public in general maybe 'blind' health illiterates, but not all are! @arunachaltimes_
We launched Serro on @nicklaunches today!
We're building Agentic TPM. It takes live signals from all your tools and categorizes them into programs your teams are running. If the program is named in a meeting, slack, some ticket, your code, it gets tracked. All associated links, goals and processes and prompts get associated to programs automatically.
It's a collaborative, voice-programmable AI that tracks and surfaces all your teams' initiatives. The shared program memory can then be made accessible to downstream workflows, agents, and loops!
Special 85% off offer on Nick Launches for yet-to-be-funded startups because we're investing in you and the startup ecosystem.
https://t.co/sG4Hz58Blg
Serro blog is live!
The first post is about the big conviction we have as a company. About why every engineering org is going to have hyperscale problems, and is about to go from product engineering to program engineering as an industry.
Welcome to Program Engineering
https://t.co/9Y05llsKU9
Yes. #BoycottKenvue#BoycottJohnsonJohnson
unless @Kenvue and @JNJHealthEquity 1. you issue a public apology for misbranding sugary liquid as ORS and selling it for 2 decades at the cost of health and lives of children inspite of knowing what was happening at the ground level. If it was in the United States, you would be facing thousands of litigations from parents(parents of those children who suffered because of the deception.
2. Rebrand your tetrapack beverages completely so that there is no visual similarity to ORSL
3. Do not use ORSL in your marketing of these newly branded tetrapacks.
Please Note: We are not talking about the WHO recommended formula here.
Good morning @dr_sivaranjani
The Public Interest notice put on social media by Kenvue, the makers of Fake ORS™ is a classical case study in "Corporate Health-Washing".
Hey @kenvue@JNJNews no one needs your rubbish "hydration products" from a scientific standpoint. So you can go to hell and your products can rot on the shelves for all we care. Stop intimidating physicians and clean up your corporate mess born out of greed. Presenting your products in medical conferences is not scientific evidence, its paid endorsement. So respectfully, F.O.
A product that was commercially marketed as ORS for years despite not meeting WHO composition standards, that was formally banned by India's food safety regulator, that had its ban upheld by the Delhi High Court as a "health hazard," and that has now been cosmetically rebranded with a visually similar name, is being presented as a triumph of science-backed innovation. The WHO's own recommendation against the very sweetener used in the reformulated product is dismissed as "unrelated." And the physicians who fought for eight years to protect children from this deception are characterized as "disparaging influencers."
Here is a takedown of their sh*tty notice from my side, which you (@dr_sivaranjani) can use in your case against them.
1. "We have shaped the hydration category in India providing consumers with scientifically formulated solutions"
This is corporate euphemism for having commercialized a high-sugar beverage that was deceptively branded to resemble WHO-standard ORS for years. The product ORSL was never WHO-compliant ORS. The WHO reduced-osmolarity ORS formula specifies glucose 75 mmol/L (~13.5 g/L), sodium 75 mEq/L, potassium 20 mEq/L, and a total osmolarity of 245 mOsm/L. A product with roughly 8–9 times the glucose concentration of WHO ORS is not a "scientifically formulated solution", it is a sugary beverage that can worsen diarrheal dehydration through osmotic diarrhea. FSSAI found that the labeling and branding of ORSL beverages may mislead consumers into believing the product was a medically approved oral rehydration solution.
2. "In January 2026, we diversified our portfolio into two distinct brands — ORSL (Drug product) and ERZL (Food Product)"
This "dual-brand strategy" was not voluntary innovation — it was forced by the FSSAI ban. ORSL has even rebranded to ERZL (the 'e' designed to look similar to 'o' and the 'z' to 's'). The visual similarity between "ERZL" and "ORSL" is not accidental. The product's communication and positioning may create an association with ORS, and references to similarly named products in branding or advertising could reinforce consumer recall and blur the distinction between scientifically approved ORS and commercially marketed electrolyte beverages. A parent who was buying ORSL thinking it was ORS will now see ERZL in the same pharmacy shelf with near-identical packaging and make the same error. This is classic brand continuity engineering designed to circumvent regulatory intent.
3. "Reduced the added sugar content by 87% with 1.4X more electrolytes" — framed as a public health achievement
If you reduce sugar by 87% from a baseline of ~110 g/L added sugar, you still have approximately 14 g/L added sugar - and you have now replaced that sugar with sucralose, an artificial sweetener. The framing of "87% reduction" is a mathematical trick: it sounds impressive only because the starting point was absurdly, irresponsibly high. It is like a tobacco company boasting of reducing tar by 87% and expecting public health applause. Furthermore, "1.4X more electrolytes" is vague and scientifically meaningless without specifying which electrolytes, at what concentrations, and whether the resulting osmolarity is appropriate for the claimed indication. An electrolyte drink for "everyday hydration" in a healthy individual is, physiologically speaking, unnecessary - plain water and a normal diet provide adequate electrolytes for non-pathological states.
4. "There is well established scientific and safety assessment of sucralose, which is recognized by Global Health Authorities like Codex, EFSA besides both FSSAI & CDSCO/Indian Pharmacopoeia"
This statement cherry-picks regulatory approvals while deliberately ignoring the WHO's own 2023 guideline where especially, this ingredient is not supposed to be part of "healthy hydration."
5. "WHO Guidelines (2023) regarding use of 'non-sugar sweeteners' to reduce the risk of unhealthy weight gain have also been cited out of context and is unrelated to products like WHO ORS and Electrolyte Drinks"
This is perhaps the most egregious misrepresentation in the entire notice. The WHO 2023 guideline on NSS is a public health recommendation against the use of non-sugar sweeteners in foods and beverages across the board. This guideline provides evidence-informed guidance on the use of non-sugar sweeteners in adults and children. The guideline explicitly applies to "all synthetic and naturally occurring or modified non-nutritive sweeteners found in manufactured foods and beverages." ERZL is a manufactured beverage containing sucralose. It falls squarely within the scope of this recommendation. Kenvue's argument that this guideline is "unrelated" to electrolyte drinks is scientifically untenable. The WHO did not carve out exceptions for beverages that happen to contain electrolytes. The guideline's scope is defined by the presence of NSS in the product, not by the product's marketing category.
6. "We have been singularly targeted by a few Healthcare Professionals cum influencers in a disparaging and denigrating manner"
The healthcare professionals who raised these concerns were exercising their professional duty. Dr. Sivaranjani documented cases over eight years, including a diabetic child from Chennai who was dehydrated despite being given an ORS drink from a tetra pack. It was her advocacy that ultimately led FSSAI to act.
Characterizing physician advocacy against misleading health products as "disparagement" is a well-documented corporate strategy (SLAPP: Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) designed to silence public health criticism through legal intimidation.
The notice's claim that these professionals are motivated by "commercial benefits" and "increasing followers" is an ad hominem attack that inverts the actual conflict of interest. The commercial benefit accusation is outrageous - the party actually benefitting commercially from the product is the company Kenvue (Johnson & Johnson).
7. "We always recommend our ORSL WHO ORS portfolio to address diarrheal dehydration and ERZL for everyday hydration, respectively"
The concept of "everyday hydration" requiring a commercial electrolyte-and-sucralose beverage has no basis in physiology or evidence-based medicine. It is not recommended in any clinical guidelines. Healthy individuals with intact renal function, normal diet, and access to water do not need electrolyte supplementation for everyday activities. "Silent dehydration" - a marketing term promoted by these manufacturers - does not appear in recognized medical literature. This framing medicalizes a normal physiological state to create a market for an unnecessary product.
8. "We had no choice but to take necessary action to safeguard the brand integrity"
Sending legal notices to physicians who raise legitimate scientific concerns about a product that was already banned by FSSAI and whose ban was upheld by the Delhi High Court is not "safeguarding brand integrity." It is an attempt to suppress public health advocacy. The timing - sending notices after being forced to rebrand by regulatory action - suggests the motive is to silence documentation of the rebranding's deceptive visual similarity to the original banned product, not to correct misinformation.
The science is not on Kenvue's side. The regulatory record is not on Kenvue's side. The public interest is not on Kenvue's side.
Tired, but not giving up! Pls download and share before there is a gag order on me.
Thanks to @IndiaESI (who also impleaded in my PIL against misleading branding of sugary drinks as ORS), @FAIMA_INDIA_ , HRDA Andhrapradesh, HRDA Telangana, MARD Thane, MARD Nagpur, Junior Doctor's Association Ahmedabad, Telangana Junior Doctor's Association, Junior Doctor's Association Ranchi, T-SRDA, GARD, Telangana Doctor's Forum, RDA Aligarh, RDWS UP, IMA Telangana State, IMA Hyderabad Airport, Endocrine Society of Telangana, Indian Doctor's and Dermatologists against quackery, for condemning the notice of Johnson&Johnson and Kenvue in which they accused me of disparaging them for my commercial benefits and views! Thank you for staying by my side! Grateful!
Our VC is adamantly opposed to this idea and I need your help.
I’m trying to push for “Co-programmable AI for Dev Teams” as our one-liner.
Our VC thinks it’s stupid.
Our idea is that there needs to be a way to co-program the AI dev teams use on a daily basis. Programming should happen live in-meeting through voice. Just like a coworker would learn the dependencies and what’s important to whom on the job.
Wdyt? Do I fold or double down?
Image is of our current one liner