Sent by the Pakistani military sources:
JUST IN: ROUNDUP OF INDIAN MILITARY TARGETS HIT BY PAKISTAN
1. Beas:
✅ BrahMos missile storage facility hit and destroyed.
2. Udhampur:
✅ Air Defence systems hit and completely destroyed.
✅ Air Base hit and heavily damaged.
3. Pathankot:
✅ Airfield hit in precision missile attack.
4. Jalandhar:
✅ Airbase hit in ongoing strikes.
5. Gujarat:
✅ Multiple air bases and locations hit.
6. Delhi Region:
✅ Missile intercepted near Hisar; Delhi remains a potential target.
7. Rajasthan:
✅ Military installations hit.
8. Srinagar:
✅ Airbase hit.
✅ 20 military casualties reported.
9. Chandigarh:
✅ Weapon depot hit and neutralised.
Total Impact:
✅ 26+ Indian military sites hit.
✅ Widespread damage and disruption across northern India.
According to senior Pakistani journalist, Pakistan will keep India awake tonight.High likelihood of a Pakistani attack on India tonight.
#OperationSindhoor#PakvsIndiaWar
Some pressing questions that must be answered:
1. How did Indian missiles, fired from hundreds of kilometers away, manage to hit targeted religious seminaries with "100% accuracy"?
2. Why did Pakistan’s multi-billion-dollar anti-missile defense system fail to intercept even a single missile?
3. If this was an airstrike, how did the air defense system remain inactive, especially when during the Balakot incident, Indian aircraft were intercepted immediately?
4. How did India carry out such brazen attacks on multiple Pakistani cities with such confidence? Was it assured at an international level that Pakistan would not retaliate?
5. The U.S. Vice President had stated that India should carry out a controlled operation and Pakistan should cooperate. Was India's specific targeting of seminaries linked to designated organizations, while Pakistan silently watched, an implementation of that directive?
6. Pakistan had evacuated seminaries belonging to specific religious groups, including in Azad Kashmir. Did they have prior knowledge of the nature of the attack? If so, did that information come from India?
7. Ata Tarar made a bizarre speech in Parliament yesterday, saying, "Let’s move forward together—this is not the time for internal conflict." Such a sudden shift from someone like Tarar suggests that the government was forewarned about the attack. If so, why wasn’t there any preparedness?
8. India repeatedly issued threats of military action. Why didn’t Pakistan formulate a plan of action to ensure an immediate and strong response in case of an attack?
9. India was initially expected to act within 72 hours, but instead chose to strike nearly 12–13 days later, just two days before May 9—when widespread protests were planned against the imposed regime in Pakistan. Why that timing?
10. Trump stated that the Indian action was anticipated and expressed hope that the matter would be resolved soon. Was this a mutually coordinated plan between two unpopular regimes, facilitated by a third power, where both sides could gain popularity through limited military action?
11. Despite such a large-scale attack on Pakistan, why have Maryam Nawaz and Shahbaz Sharif not tweeted a single statement against Modi? Has the Sharif family staged this joint show based on their personal relations with India—one that benefits both regimes?
#IndiaPakistan