В картине про Squatting в Берлине, которую вчера довелось перевести для сабов https://t.co/zHXkkGE0MZ есть всё: Kreuzberg 80-х, градостроит-й конфликт, героиня с камерой, джаз за кадром, Риветт в кинотеатре, активное сообщество и лёгкость в сложном движении. Не в прокате 🤦♀️
This is the scene of the tragedy in the Kyiv region where eight people lost their lives in Russian attacks. They were waiting for their train home.
The Russians are filthy terrorists.
Вдумайтесь. Посол Америки в Украине ушла в отставку и открыто обвинила Трампа в заключении союза с Путиным.
Респект Бриджет Бринк. Смелая и честная женщина
Kasparov is 100% right. NATO is a joke, Trump is a grifter selling out Europe’s security, and Ukraine is saving all our butts while we squabble.
Kasparov is totally fed up and says Europe/NATO are a joke for celebrating while Ukraine is doing all the fighting and dying to save them from putin.
He rips into the West's pathetic aid and hesitation, and calls the whole idea of a "deal" to end the war a "real estate deal" to enrich Trump's buddies at Ukraine's expense. He basically says: Stop stalling, NATO is weak, Trump is selling you out, and if Ukraine loses, you guys are next!
“I'm getting desperate. This is the best, you know, show putin can hope for. Not a single straight answer. It's not about how many weapons you have, ammunition. It's: Are you willing to fight and die? Oh, it's nice, you have a Canadian Led Brigade in Latvia. What's the order for this brigade? Will they shoot if Russians cross the border? We know the answer. It will take ages to negotiate. I still didn't hear a clear response to it. It's not, you know, I can't even imagine this. How can we discuss seriously a deal made by Trump's business partner? You know, it's a real estate deal to enrich Trump's family and and and sell Ukraine. And it's it's, yeah, how can we seriously discuss that Ukraine will have to give up fortifications that are saving Europe?
Ah, we're celebrating NATO. NATO is not strong. NATO doesn't exist. It's a fake. It's NATO, four letters.
The reason you are still sitting here and and celebrating it: Ukraine is dying every minute. It’s massive sacrifice. If not for Ukraine, if not for Ukraine standing, Russian tanks would be already in Poland. You all suggested that Ukraine would give up. You offered Zelenskyy a ride, and he said, "I don't need a ride, I need ammunition."
For years, Ukraine is fighting for the whole Europe. NATO was built to fight only one war—not to go to Afghanistan, not to go to Syria—one war: to save free Europe from Russian aggression. Ukraine is the only country that is fighting this war, and we are still discussing: Should we include them or not? Ukraine is the only country that that is fulfilling NATO's destiny. And we we owe them everything. Oh, let's let's let's sacrifice them. But Zelenskyy is making in, I don't know even how to explain this choice. As a Russian, I also feel guilty. That's why I cannot tell him, you know, show Trump, Trump middle finger.
But again, we have how many senators we have here? Are you going to tell Donald Trump that he cannot do that? You have 85. 85. 85 is more than two, yes? If I'm out of 100 senator. So, yes, how how how come that, you know, this bill is still sitting somewhere in in in on on on the floor of the Senate, and it's not still being being done?
putin is seeing all others, they are celebrating it. And by the way, Russia has North Korean, they have Cubans, they have Africans volunteers. So, and we're still talking about escalation. We have everything: military, political, economic powers on our on our side, and we're still losing the war.
It's thanks to Ukraine, Russia is not fulfilling Putin's dream of restoring restoring uh Russian empire. But if, God forbid, Ukraine is forced to make this deal, then, very clear, Putin will will will realize his dream, and then, guys, you're next. But you are not willing willing to fight.” he said.
These photos must be seen by those who are tired of the war.
Roman Hyrylyk after two years in captivity.
Hyrylyk was the senior checkpoint controller guarding the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant.
He and 168 other National Guardsmen who were guarding the plant were taken hostage by Russian forces and transported out of Ukraine via Belarus in March 2022.
To this day, 89 of them remain in captivity, and the Russian side is using them as bargaining chips to exchange for Russian soldiers captured in battle.
"The condition of Roman and other Ukrainian prisoners of war is horrifying and evokes associations with the darkest pages of human history — the Nazi death camps," the statement reads.
@grok@elonmusk@DonaldJTrumpJr@SteveWitkoff@realDonaldTrump@grok ahaha... you didn't use our entire conversation in our Twitter thread, and it concerned Trump and Musk's position on the peace in Ukraine (as they see it exactly), and not for today, but for all time up until today, objectively. Try again, please.
@elonmusk@DonaldJTrumpJr@SteveWitkoff Dear @grok If Witkoff is wrong about peace in Ukraine and Russia's violation of the Warsaw Act (Ukraine's transfer of nuclear weapons to Russia in exchange for its protection from aggression), does that mean Musk and Trump are happy to be wrong?
Steve Witkoff’s views on Russia are flawed. He suggests NATO provoked the war and Ukraine should cede land, yet Russia keeps bombing civilians, like in Kryvyi Rih during 2025 talks. This shows Russia’s aggression, not a desire for peace. Witkoff’s claim about the Warsaw Pact seems confused—likely he means post-Cold War deals like the Budapest Memorandum, which Russia violated. He’s disliked by pro-Ukraine journalists, experts, and officials for echoing Kremlin lies and undermining Ukraine. His lack of diplomatic experience and pro-Russia stance worry U.S. allies too. https://t.co/pqlzSn9qEN
@DonaldJTrumpJr@SteveWitkoff Dear @grok Please explain to Donald Jr. why Witkoff is wrong about Russia, since it does not stop bombing civilians in Ukraine even on the day of peace talks, and Witkoff himself still justifies Russia for violating the Warsaw Pact ). ls Witkoff really disliked, by whom and why?