Argue Social

For entertainment purposes only! ⬅️

[Argue Social @arguewityaself1]

As you sit at a stop light, turn off your a/c, take penicillin, surf the internet, and have open heart surgery I want you to ask yourself would you live the life you live?

[ZeroBarkThirty(2) @ZeroBarkThirty2]

@trendyhoopstars Why is everyone black?

[M’V5 @SubtleNoises]

WNBA Fans are truly undefeated.

[Argue Social @arguewityaself1]

Every figure I post about the Caitlin Clark Foundation comes from its public IRS filings, its own press releases or its website, linked in each post. Report away sweetheart, the audit won’t stop. I’ll make a website and a newsletter if you keep this up.

[Katrina @katrina__2]

@arguewityaself1 @grok It’s not unaccounted for you idiot. Report her y’all. Make her start her account over. Even if it doesn’t with this post eventually it will.

[Argue Social @arguewityaself1]

The IRS has the total. "Accounted for" means knowing who gave it. Any donor giving $5,000+ has to be listed on Schedule B. The return answers "No," yet four companies publicly announced $104,690 in 2024 gifts. That leaves $1.1M with no named source. The IRS doesn't audit a return when it's filed, it will once I whistleblow. 😊

[Cory German @german_cory]

@arguewityaself1 @grok So the 1.2 million reported to IRS is unaccounted for? But the IRS is showing the 1.2 million? So that means the IRS knows about the 1.2 million. Therefore its accounted for.

[Argue Social @arguewityaself1]

There are dozens of clips of Caitlin pushing players, punching chairs and punching stanchions yet I’m the psychopath? 😂😂😂 yeah, okay.
Well, hopefully one day I will take out my psychopathic rage on you.

[JeffreyO'neil @chippyoneil]

@arguesocial You are so angry. You need to see a psychologist for being a psychopath.

[Argue Social @arguewityaself1]

The fact that you keep leaving the same comment over and over lets me know that you’re the one who’s triggered because what I’m digging up about this foundation is gonna have you all holding pitchforks screaming about how you will not be replaced, but thankfully, your birth rate is down so we won’t have to deal with you guys much longer

[K.W. @WILSONBATCAVE32]

@arguesocial Yup. You read correctly babe, bitter. By like I asked, why are you triggered?

[Argue Social @arguewityaself1]

Maybe you should go do the research.

[Badhoopwatcher @Badhoopwatcher1]

@arguesocial Is her foundation legally required to donate the money in the same calendar year as the money was received?

[Argue Social @arguewityaself1]

There is nothing better than a good night’s sleep after Dream W.

[Auntie Kym @KYMOTOSIS]

Blessings everybody especially ANGEL MUTHAFUCKIN REESE!

[Argue Social @arguewityaself1]

@KYMOTOSIS 😂

[Auntie Kym @KYMOTOSIS]

Oh Alexaaaa are you going to update this?????

[Argue Social @arguewityaself1]

@grok Same IRS filing (EIN 93-2840468): https://t.co/eZyfCvWPCn

True or false:
1) Part I line 13 shows $0 in grants paid.
2) Part IX line 25 total expenses are $4,203.
3) Part X line 16 total assets at end of year are $1,212,642.

[Argue Social @arguewityaself1]

Followers don't change a tax return either.

Caitlin Clark Foundation, 2024 Form 990:
Grants paid out: $0
Total expenses: $4,203
Assets at year end: $1,212,642

Straight from the IRS:
https://t.co/eZyfCvWPCn

[Katrina @katrina__2]

@MAHirota1958 @arguesocial Report her account. She’ll lose the followers she has.

[Argue Social @arguewityaself1]

@grok Using the same IRS filing (EIN 93-2840468): https://t.co/eZyfCvWPCn

True or false:
1) $1,204,879 minus $104,690 is $1,100,189.
2) $1,100,189 is 91.31% of $1,204,879.
3) Posting a public Form 990 is legal and is not misinformation.

[Argue Social @arguewityaself1]

Reporting someone for posting a public IRS filing doesn't change the numbers.

Caitlin Clark Foundation, 2024 Form 990:
Raised: $1,204,879
Press-announced gifts: $104,690
No public source found: $1,100,189

Read it yourself:
https://t.co/eZyfCvXnrV

[Katrina @katrina__2]

@IrateSocrates @arguesocial Report her! Let’s get her banned.

[Argue Social @arguewityaself1]

@grok Check this IRS filing for the Caitlin Clark Foundation (EIN 93-2840468): https://t.co/eZyfCvXnrV

True or false:
1) Part VIII line 1f is $1,204,879.
2) Part IV line 2 (Schedule B) says "No."
3) For a 509(a)(2) charity, one donor of $5,000+ requires Schedule B.

[Argue Social @arguewityaself1]

You said I'm lying. Here are the receipts, straight from the IRS.

Caitlin Clark Foundation, 2024 Form 990:
Line 1f: $1,204,879. No donor named.
Schedule B required? "No."
Press-announced 2024 gifts: $104,690.

Show me which number is wrong.
https://t.co/eZyfCvWPCn

[Katrina @katrina__2]

@AlaiaKali1 @arguesocial Report the account, I did. The more people that report she’ll be banned. If she doesn’t have documented proof.

[Argue Social @arguewityaself1]

@grok Verify the figures in this post against the foundation's 2024 Form 990 and the Schedule B instructions. Explain what "No" on Part IV line 2 requires of a 509(a)(2) org, and what penalty applies if a $5,000+ donor gave in2024.

[Argue Social @arguewityaself1]

Caitlin Clark Foundation 2024 Form 990: $1,204,879 in contributions on one line, no donors listed. Press-announced 2024 gifts: $104,690. The other $1,100,189 (91%) has no public source found. Schedule B: answered "No." IRS rule: one $5,000+ donor requires it.

[Tasty Tacos @TastyTacos6]

@arguesocial @grok is this true