Let’s give 3 lucky traders the chance to win a **$10K 2-Step FFT Account!
Want to enter? It’s simple:
Follow @Alikhan_tpt
Follow @forexfundedfft
Like & Repost this post
Winners will be announced in 24 HOURS!
3 accounts 3 winners One chance to get funded.
Good luck traders!
Scam alert ⚠️ @WSFunded scam exposed⬇️
A trader on a $100K Wall Street Funded account submitted a $6,020 withdrawal after booking a profit.
Three days later the request was declined for risk detected and the account was terminated.
The firm pointed to one EURUSD sell around the 13 August 2026 Producer Price Index release.
The position was opened before the print, held through the high-impact window, and closed without a take-profit.
Risk treated that single ticket as a hard breach of the news SL/TP rule.
That finding sits against the firm own support AI, which describes a missing take-profit during news as a softbreach warning
it does not immediately close the account and does not automatically cancel a withdrawal.
Repeated warnings can later become a hard breach.
Here, one event was used to shut the account and block the $6,020 payout.
The trader reports more than 20 days of tickets and emails with no clear written resolutio.n.
Ask to the firm and reviewers
If the published standard is a softbreach, a single warning should not become a full termination and a denied six-thousand-dollar payout without a documented escalation.
The trader is requesting a written review of account 4014617 that matches the firm own softbreach language, plus a formal decision on the $6,020 request.
@TheTrustedProp@PropFirmMatch
I initially raised this trader complaint in public.
After I discussed the case with the @AquaFunded team and went through the proof, I realized that posting it was my mistake.
I removed the post immediately.
@Tkirandavid69 Staying here and blaming the firm for your own mistakeis not fair Take responsibility, accept the error, and move on.
The evidence is not fake.
The only information hidden in the shared image is other traders account numbers, and that was done for privacy.
The rest comes from the risk team trading records:
open times, close times, direction, lot size, and how long each trade was held.
Just from the examples already made public:
one XAUUSD sell was opened 16 seconds apart from another trader at the exact same 0.05 lot, held for more than 55 hours, and closed about 2 minutes apart.
Another XAUUSD sell was opened about 19 seconds apart at the exact same 0.04 lot, held for almost 22 hours, and again closed within a few minutes.
There was also reverse trading:
a 0.08 XAUUSD sell matched against another trader 0.08 XAUUSD buy, both held for more than 55 hours and closed roughly 2 minutes apart.
Those are only samples.
The full review found hundreds of additional matching and opposing trades.
You can disagree with the outcome.
Calling the file fabricated is not accurate.
The firm says it would not reject a payout without reviewing the full history, and it still issued a full refund as a goodwill gesture.
The decision will not be changed.
To this trader:
which of those examples do you say is wrong the 0.05 lot opened 16 seconds apart, the 0.04 lot opened 19 seconds apart, or the 0.08 reverse pair?
If the records are false, publish your own ticket times, sizes, holding periods, and close times.
Did you complete the internal review before going public?
After a refund has already been paid, what are you still asking for?
Thank you @LewisAquaFunded for addressing this issue with undeniable proof.
♠️ The table is set.
@HolaPrimeGlobal Poker Night 4
Free-entry No-Limit Hold’em for traders who understand patience, position, and calculated risk.
💰 $50K prize pool
👥 Up to 600 players
🏆 5 Prime Challenge accounts on the line
🥇 $25K
🥈 $10K
🥉–5th $5K each
📅 Sunday, 13 Sept | 5:30 PM UTC
Same mindset that gets traders funded.
Different game.
Same edge.
Register now.
Take your seat.
@fundedsquad is quietly doing something most firms only talk about.
In less than nine months of 2026, they’ve processed 4,563 payouts totaling $2.08 million to traders around the world.
That’s real money leaving the platform and landed at traders wallets, not just challenge fees and promises. 💰🌍
The scale is impressive.
The consistency is even more so.
credit goes to @ajwadthefalcon He’s built FundedSquad with a clear priority:
get payouts out fast and keep the volume high.
That kind of operational discipline is rare in this space. ⚡📈
The numbers don’t need extra hype.
They already tell the story.
CEO @seanbaint just showed why Blue Guardian futures stands apart.
Trader received a $1,786.50 payout from Blue Guardian Futures within 24 hours of request processed cleanly after a 90/10 split on $1,985 profit.
After earlier follow-up, the team delivered as promised. Professional execution, transparent breakdown, and reliable processing.
Respect to Sean Bainton and the Blue Guardian team for running a firm that actually pays traders.
@GuardianFutures
The Giveaway Is still live traders
It's 5x $5k fundingpips accounts👇
We will announce winners tomorrow at Discord so follow the eligibility criteria and join Discord for update tomorrow.
Best of luck everyone.
"@NYSMarkets have a look into this trader issue as soon as possible"
A trader secured a $10,000 one-step evaluation account from NYS Markets using a promotional code the firm made available.
The trader successfully passed the challenge according to the stated rules and reached the payout stage, submitting a $160 withdrawal request.
NYS Markets subsequently rejected the payout.
In their communication, the firm claimed the promotional code had been leaked and circulated without authorization due to an internal system issue on their side.
They stated that because the account was obtained through this unauthorized code rather than an official paid offer, they would not process the payout while still acknowledging the trader performance and encouraging the purchase of a new account at a discount.
This left the trader with a denied payout after meeting the firm own trading requirements, highlighting serious concerns around the reliability of NYS Markets’ promotional practices, account eligibility enforcement, and payout processes.
@pakothawani@TheTrustedProp@PropFirmMatch
ONE OFFER.
TWO PATHS.
FOR LIMITED TIME.
@Pipstonecapital just opened the Duo 30% off both 1-Step and 2-Step challenges.
No consistency rules.
No activation fees.
A cleaner route to a funded account.
1-Step pricing after 30% off
5K — $41.30
10K — $83.30
25K — $209.30
50K — $300.30
100K — $489.30
2-Step pricing after 30% off
5K — $34.30
10K — $69.30
25K — $174.30
50K — $244.30
100K — $419.30
Only 300 spots.
First come, first served.
When they’re gone, the Duo offer is gone.
Use code PIP30 and lock in the next move while the window is still open.
Serious traders just got a stronger reason to start.
@GoatFunded is running 45% off sitewide on challenges and instant funding one of the more accessible ways to trade larger capital.
Current highlighted pricing with code GFT45:
• 5K Goat Challenge — $17
• 100K Instant Goat Plan — $448
• 100K Instant Premium Plan — $722
The offer covers both evaluation-style challenges and instant plans, with MT5 available, first payout on demand on eligible accounts, and profit splits up to 100%.
Limited-time pricing.
If you’ve been waiting for a lower entry point, this is a clean window to review the terms and decide.
Scam alert ⚠️ @FundedHeroX
Scam exposed⬇️
3 months of trading.
Rules followed.
Profit there.
Then FundedHero hits you with this:
Defamation Policy.
Public criticism = instant ban + they keep every pending payout.
No screenshot of what you supposedly said.
No proof.
No specific post.
Support literally says they cannot show you the evidence.
That’s not risk management. That’s a gag clause with a cash grab attached.
They update the policy, refuse to document the violation, then tell you the ban is permanent across every account.
Work vanishes.
Money stays with them.
If a firm can cancel a payout because you talked about them online and then refuse to show the post they claim you made traders should treat that as a red flag, not a rule.
Tag the firm.
Tag the reviewers.
Save the emails.
Don’t let the silence become the product.
@itsdrdollar@parcefx
Scam alert ⚠️ @TradingLucid scam exposed⬇️
A trader completed KYC with TradingLucid with valid documents.
The firm still flagged the account for identity verification, claimed inconsistencies, and shut off access with no appeal and no explanation.
What specific inconsistencies were found?
How is a final, unappealable denial compatible with 24-hour support and clarity?
When will the firm stop blocking traders who followed the process instead of hiding behind a generic replies?.
Winners announcement
Traders, please remain active.
In one hour I will announce the five winners of the $5,000 funded accounts.
Please ensure you have met the eligibility criteria and joined our Discord.
Three winners will be selected from Discord and two winners will be selected from X.
Stay tuned.
Our 3 winners announcement on discord will be checking everything manually who have completed all the tasks.
And our x winners are
@PROP_FM_PROMOTE@futuretrader353
Congratulations please dm your email.
Stay active in Discord if any of the winner have not completed tasks we will announce new winners.
Thank you.
We’re pleased to announce the winners of our 3× $5,000 funded accounts giveaway from Discord Congratulations to:
@Neeraj0c@PijusdasDev@Het_nexora
Please DM us your email addresses so we can proceed with account setup.
Hey @BlueGuardiancom a trader submitted a payout request on 28 August that remained in verification for ten days and was then declined on Live KYC grounds.
The trader used a fully manual strategy, and the attached records show the processing status, August performance, and the confidentiality notice that followed.
The trader respectfully asks Blue Guardian risk, compliance, and payout teams to reopen the case, compare the Live KYC finding with the actual trade history, and either release the funds or provide a clear written explanation of the specific issues identified.
The trader also asks that a good-faith public request for review not be treated as a legal threat.
A prompt, documented response would restore confidence and settle the matter fairly.
@seanbaint please have a look into this trader issue thank you.
Scam alert ⚠️ @BrightFunded
Scam exposed⬇️
A trader @kurdm12332 bought 3 BrightFunded accounts, passed all 3, reached funded, and made profits on every account.
On payout day, BrightFunded requested an interview.
After the interview, all 3 accounts were breached for reverse trading with another person.
Main issue that other person was also profitable and received payouts.
If two people were reverse trading each other, one side takes the loss.
Both sides being profitable does not add up.
When that logic was challenged, the allegation changed to group trading, and the other person accounts were breached too.
The trader asked repeatedly for the trade data, timestamps, positions, and proof.
Convincing evidence was not provided.
BrightFunded:
publish the logs. Show the trades. Explain how both parties can be profitable under a reverse-trading claim.