@BrightFunded@SybDijkstra@jelle_dijkstra@benjamingalindo@Trustpilot@PropFirmMatch
It has now been more than 10 days since I first asked BrightFunded to clearly explain why my accounts were breached, and I still have not received a proper explanation or any evidence.
They breached all three of my funded accounts, accusing me of group trading, yet despite repeatedly asking them to provide the alleged evidence—including the timing, positions, trading data, or any specific proof supporting their accusation—they have provided nothing.
What makes this even more concerning is that their accusation changed. First, I was accused of reverse trading with another person. I checked the situation with that person and found that he had also made a profit and received a payout.
So I have a very simple question: How can two people supposedly be reverse trading against each other while both accounts are in profit and both receive payouts? That does not make sense.
After I challenged the reverse-trading accusation and pointed out this contradiction, the accusation then changed to “group trading.” I immediately asked them to provide the evidence for this new accusation as well—the exact timing, positions, trading patterns, and any other data they relied on. Again, nothing has been provided.
Instead, they continue replying to my reviews with the same repetitive, robotic responses without addressing the actual questions. Even their support team appears to respond with generic answers rather than providing a clear explanation of what I supposedly did wrong.
If a firm can breach three funded accounts, change the reason for the breach, refuse to show the evidence behind its accusations, and repeatedly avoid answering direct questions, I believe this is something potential traders should seriously consider before trusting the firm with their money.
Based on my experience, I strongly advise people to stay away from BrightFunded. If you ever face a similar situation, don't expect a clear resolution or meaningful explanation from them based on what I have experienced.
I have given them more than enough time to explain themselves. I am still waiting for actual evidence—not repeated excuses, changing accusations, or automated responses.
By the way, all of them have blocked me!
This guys named @benjamingalindo is a coward he is a real coward! He doesn't even answer me because he knows what brightfunded has been doung to traders! These are two of my funded accounts, they breached them due to some accusations which didn't take place ever! That's a shame, i have contacted them hundreds of times, and no one is answering!
@Trustpilot
Trustpilot has removed all of my reviews of BrightFunded, without providing any clear explanation or transparent justification.
This is extremely concerning. If reviews can simply be removed without properly informing the reviewer why, then what credibility does the platform have as a place for genuine, independent customer feedback?
I sincerely hope this decision was not influenced by any financial relationship or pressure from BrightFunded. If there is a legitimate reason for removing my reviews, Trustpilot should have the transparency and professionalism to explain exactly what rule was violated and provide evidence for that decision.
Silently removing customer reviews without a meaningful explanation is unacceptable. Trustpilot owes reviewers transparency, consistency, and accountability — regardless of the company involved
@BrightFunded@benjamingalindo@SybDijkstra@PropFirmMatch@Trustpilot
It has now been more than 20 days since I first asked BrightFunded to provide a clear explanation and actual evidence for why all 3 of my funded accounts were breached.
The accusations have changed, but the evidence is still missing.
First, I was accused of “reverse trading” with another trader. I questioned this because, according to my understanding, that trader also made a profit and received a payout.
I then asked BrightFunded a very simple question:
How can two traders supposedly be reverse trading against each other while both accounts are profitable and both receive payouts?
Instead of providing the specific trading data supporting the accusation, the reason later changed to “group trading.”
Again, I asked them to provide the evidence: • Exact trading times • Positions • Trading patterns • Relevant account data • Any specific information showing what rule I allegedly violated
So far, I still haven't received a proper explanation or the evidence I repeatedly requested.
What is even more frustrating is that my questions continue to receive generic responses instead of direct answers. My reviews have also received repetitive responses that don't address the specific points I raised.
And now, all of my accounts have been breached and I have been blocked.
I’m not asking for special treatment. I’m asking for transparency.
If BrightFunded believes I violated its rules, I believe they should be able to clearly explain which trades caused the violation and provide the relevant evidence.
More than 20 days later, I’m still waiting.
BrightFunded, I’m giving you another opportunity to address this publicly and provide the evidence behind the decision.
I will continue documenting this situation until it is properly resolved.
Sending me my payout and then breaching all three of my accounts does not mean I should be grateful or consider the matter resolved.
I want my accounts back as well.
It took significant time, effort, energy, discipline, and dedication to pass those accounts and reach the funded phase. I did not spend weeks working toward funded accounts just to receive a payout of $3,000–$9,000 and have the accounts taken away afterward. My goal was to continue trading, make money, and build a long-term relationship with the firm.
How can you breach accounts that I worked hard to earn without providing clear evidence of the alleged violation and without identifying exactly which rule I violated?
If you are accusing me of breaking the rules, then show the evidence. Show the specific trades, timestamps, accounts, data, or rule that supposedly proves the violation.
A payout does not erase the issue, and it does not give you the right to remove accounts that were earned legitimately without properly proving a rule violation.
I am asking for evidence, transparency, and the restoration of my accounts—not just a payout.
🚨 PAYOUT DAY TURNED INTO AN ACCOUNT TERMINATION DAY?
@kurdm12332 claims he successfully passed 3 @BrightFunded accounts and generated profits on all three.
Everything seemed fine until he requested his payout.
After an interview, all three accounts were reportedly breached.
The accusation? First “reverse trading.”
Then reportedly “group trading.”
But there’s one massive problem:
The other trader allegedly made profits too.
That leaves traders with a very simple question:
WHAT EXACTLY DID @BrightFunded DETECT?
@BrightFunded, don’t make traders guess.
If the accounts were connected, show the evidence.
If the trades matched, show the timestamps.
If the violation is real, the data should speak for itself.
@kurdm12332 deserves a clear explanation, not a moving target.
PROOF > ACCUSATIONS.
#propworldnews📈
🚨 TRADER SAYS @BrightFunded CHANGED THE ACCUSATION STILL NO EVIDENCE
Trader @kurdm12332 (Barzani) says he has been trying for more than 10 days to get a clear explanation from @BrightFunded after all three of his funded accounts were breached.
According to the trader, he was initially accused of reverse trading with another person. After he challenged that claim, he says the accusation was changed to “group trading.”
The trader says he repeatedly asked for the evidence behind the accusations including trade timing, positions and trading data but claims he still hasn’t received it.
He also says the other trader involved was profitable and received a payout, which he believes contradicts the reverse-trading accusation.
He claims support continued sending repetitive responses and that the accounts involved have now blocked him.
What do you think? Should a prop firm provide the actual trading evidence when a trader challenges a breach?
@kurdm12332@BrightFunded
It's a shame for a firm like brightfunded to block me which they claim to be one of the top firms in the field! They have scammed me and many other people! one advise for you guys! Stay away from them, when you make it to funded phase and do the payout, then they will breach your account, don't believe in other people posting about 30,000$-50,000$ payout! They are influencers and youtubers, they are being paid for advertisement!
Thanks a lot, i have been asking them at least to answer me! I have sent more than ten emails to their support and risk department and none of them is answering me! that's a joke! How can a firm just breach my account and don't answer my emails! i have seen many other people facing same problem with them! that's a pure scamming!
🚨 BRIGHTFUNDED — SERIOUS QUESTIONS FOR TRADERS
A trader @kurdm12332 publicly claimed that his funded accounts were terminated after he became profitable, with the allegations reportedly changing from “reverse trading” to “group trading.”
The trader says he repeatedly requested the evidence behind these accusations but did not receive what he considered a satisfactory explanation.
BrightFunded’s own response tells a different story:
• The firm says its risk team detected coordinated group trading.
• It says the trader completed a verification interview.
• BrightFunded says the alleged violation was confirmed.
• However, the firm also states that the trader’s profits were paid in full on September 1. (Trustpilot)
• The account access was then revoked because of the alleged violation.
This raises an important question:
If the evidence was strong enough to permanently terminate a trader, why shouldn’t the trader be given a clear explanation of what evidence led to that decision?
BrightFunded’s published rules say copy trading between accounts owned by the same person is allowed, while trading on behalf of others and signal-based trading are prohibited.
The firm also says flagged accounts can undergo manual inspection.
(BrightFunded Help Center)
Compliance is necessary.
But transparency is necessary too.
A trader should not have to rely on public posts to understand why their account was terminated.
@BrightFunded — Will you provide a clear, verifiable explanation of the evidence behind this decision while protecting other traders’ privacy?
Traders deserve rules that are clear, consistent and transparently enforced.
@BrightFunded@benjamingalindo@jelle_dijkstra
#BrightFunded #PropFirm #Forex #Trading
It has now been more than 10 days since I first asked BrightFunded to clearly explain why my accounts were breached, and I still have not received a proper explanation or any evidence.
They breached all three of my funded accounts, accusing me of group trading, yet despite repeatedly asking them to provide the alleged evidence—including the timing, positions, trading data, or any specific proof supporting their accusation—they have provided nothing.
What makes this even more concerning is that their accusation changed. First, I was accused of reverse trading with another person. I checked the situation with that person and found that he had also made a profit and received a payout.
So I have a very simple question: How can two people supposedly be reverse trading against each other while both accounts are in profit and both receive payouts? That does not make sense.
After I challenged the reverse-trading accusation and pointed out this contradiction, the accusation then changed to “group trading.” I immediately asked them to provide the evidence for this new accusation as well—the exact timing, positions, trading patterns, and any other data they relied on. Again, nothing has been provided.
Instead, they continue replying to my reviews with the same repetitive, robotic responses without addressing the actual questions. Even their support team appears to respond with generic answers rather than providing a clear explanation of what I supposedly did wrong.
If a firm can breach three funded accounts, change the reason for the breach, refuse to show the evidence behind its accusations, and repeatedly avoid answering direct questions, I believe this is something potential traders should seriously consider before trusting the firm with their money.
Based on my experience, I strongly advise people to stay away from BrightFunded. If you ever face a similar situation, don't expect a clear resolution or meaningful explanation from them based on what I have experienced.
I have given them more than enough time to explain themselves. I am still waiting for actual evidence—not repeated excuses, changing accusations, or automated responses.
By the way, all of them have blocked me!