๐จ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ โ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐. @fundingpips & @Khldfx .
READ THIS BEFORE YOU BUY AN ACCOUNT.
๐ 7 July โ I received an email stating that my ongoing $50K Phase 1 challenge was being breached for a CID violation.
No evidence was attached.
๐ 9 July โ I emailed FundingPips asking for proof.
No response.
๐ 11 July โ I contacted support.
Their response?
"We cannot share the proof due to privacy reasons."
Privacy reasons? How does showing the suspected account number, login date, and time violate anyone's privacy?
I explained that there must be a mistake.
Their answer:
"We rechecked the issue. The ban is fair."
Case closed. No evidence provided.
๐ 15 July โ I started posting publicly asking for the evidence.
After posting daily and commenting on FundingPips-related posts, I finally received the "proof" on 28 July.
That's 21 days later.
The proof that should have been included in the original breach email only appeared after public pressure on X.
So the proof can be posted on social media, but it can't be shared privately with the trader being accused?
And here's where it gets interesting.
The alleged CID violation wasn't from my active $50K challenge.
It was supposedly from December, 7 months earlier, on a $100K Phase 1 account.
The same account that:
โ Passed Phase 1
โ Passed Phase 2
โ Passed review
โ Received a Master Account
โ Was traded for weeks
โ Was eventually breached during a losing streak
Only when I later purchased a new $50K challenge did FundingPips suddenly decide that this old account had a CID violation.
So what caused it?
A copier.
I was managing more than 5 accounts, so before using @Duplikium I specifically asked FundingPips moderators in Discord whether I could use a copier.
Their answer:
"Use any copier."
I used Duplikium.
Later, Duplikium confirmed that:
โ I was using their service
โ The account in question was connected to their infrastructure
I submitted the confirmations, the timeline, and my explanation to @avikkfp email .
I also posted everything publicly.
The result?
Silence.
No meaningful review.
No acknowledgement of the counter-evidence.
Just the same decision.
At this point, I don't even want to trade with your firm anymore.
But when your own evidence is challenged with documented counter-evidence, the least you can do is refund the money traders paid instead of ignoring them.
Transparency shouldn't require public pressure.
Evidence shouldn't appear 21 days after a ban.
And traders shouldn't be expected to accept accusations without a fair review.
So far at $10k in payouts from 1 singular @TradingLucid $150k Pro account.
Going to give 5x people who like and retweet a FREE lucid account.
Make sure you are also in the free discord: https://t.co/rmNCfhD88B
Pay close attention to these combinations: 243, 324, 342, 423, 234, 432.
In short, these are Q2, Q3, and Q4 Sequences. that consistently appear at specific times.
Pay attention to the highs and lows formed within them, and of course, donโt forget the SSMT
Thanks me later
If we take the Daily/90/micro Sequences there are 10 in a Day:
1-1-1
1-1-4
1-4-1
1-4-4
2-2-2
3-3-3
4-1-1
4-1-4
4-4-1
4-4-4
Butโฆ. Q1 and Q4 are not only combinable vertically trough the sequences but also horizontally with each other melting to one unit.
Knowing that you can filter the 1/4 sequences.
Thanks @LethalityTrader