philosophy professor working in moral philosophy and philosophy of artificial intelligence, at University of Puget Sound, grew up in Buenos Aires and New York.
nice story on the Regester Lecture that @jttiehen and I delivered last week and our work connecting the use of AI romantic companions to philosophical discussions on consciousness
Listen to @AriTubert and I discuss our views of “existentialist risk” and AI value alignment with Reid Blackman on his Ethical Machines podcast: https://t.co/oUnXDr8Udt
A new paper by @AriTubert and me in Phil Studies on AI safety: “Existentialist Risk and Value Misalignment.”
The main idea is that a capacity for misaligning your own values across time is essential to human intelligence. But then…
https://t.co/juxQkKGPVS
A new paper by @AriTubert and me in Inquiry on artificial intelligence, value alignment, and moral revolutions. The guiding idea is that there are limits to whether value alignment is a good thing. It can interfere with attempts to improve our own values. https://t.co/XucdR8GJT2
esta es una muestra de la obra de arte de mi bisabuela, para los que estén en Buenos Aires, se las recomiendo! en el museo Sivori, hasta el 27 de noviembre
Congratulations to the latest @NEHgov grant recipients, especially APA members John Doris, @bghenning, @jhimmelreich, Shaun Nichols, Ronald Sandler, @AriTubert, and @jttiehen! https://t.co/GUSylT0n1d
I am excited that @jttiehen and I have been awarded an NEH grant under the new program Dangers and Opportunities of Technology, it’s for our book project on existentialism and artificial intelligence @NEH_ODH@univpugetsound
NEH awards $41.3 million in grants to support 280 #humanities projects nationwide.
Includes funding for films, exhibitions, books, research, & education projects, & the first #NEHgrant awards in three new programs under the “American Tapestry” initiative. https://t.co/I5fqZUq4FG
Giving people the ability to opt out of recommender algorithms is a great step toward #CognitiveLiberty. But there’s a lot more we need to do. See what I recommend in @WIRED. https://t.co/nfzINExYWP
The state’s decision to bar the inclusion of lessons on gender identity and sexuality prompts the @CollegeBoard to withdraw recognition of the course. https://t.co/ZKb6KfiiuZ
@JustinCaouette@GreggDCaruso yes but “hard incompatibilists” reject free will whether determinism is true or not (term by Caruso and Pereboom, I believe)
still thinking about the interesting discussion by @GreggDCaruso this morning at #PacificAPA about AI responsibility gaps… if one is a hard incompatibilist then there are no gaps, given that nobody is really responsible… though perhaps there may still be accountability gaps?
@Angry_Cassie@GreggDCaruso agreed on accountability, that was part of the point I was making (maybe not clearly enough), the discussion was more focused on responsibility though it touched on accountability and whether accountability gaps are more easily filled than responsibility gaps (if there were any)
third, the one on Andreou’s Choosing Well: The Good, The Bad, and the Trivial… great discussion here too, Bratman said maybe we can add plans to instrumental rationality; Andreou replied that plans are judged by relational and categorial rationality so can’t be part of it